Advertisement

Spectrum and energy efficiency of cooperative spectrum prediction in cognitive radio networks

  • Nagwa Shaghluf
  • T. Aaron Gulliver
Article
  • 50 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, the spectrum and energy efficiency of cooperative spectrum prediction (CSP) in cognitive radio networks are investigated. In addition, the performance of cooperative spectrum prediction is evaluated using a hidden Markov model (HMM) and a multilayer perceptron (MLP) neural network. The cooperation between secondary users in predicting the next channel status employs AND, OR and majority rule fusion schemes. These schemes are compared for HMM and MLP predictors as a function of channel occupancy in term of prediction error, spectrum efficiency and energy efficiency. The impact of busy and idle state prediction errors on the spectrum efficiency is also investigated. Simulation results are presented which show a significant improvement in the spectrum efficiency of the secondary users CSP with the majority rule at the cost of a small degradation in energy efficiency compared to single spectrum prediction and traditional spectrum sensing.

Keywords

Cognitive radio Spectrum sensing Single spectrum prediction Cooperative spectrum prediction Energy efficiency Spectrum efficiency 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The first author is pleased to acknowledge the financial support from the University of Tripoli, Tripoli, Libya.

References

  1. 1.
    Hu, H., Zhang, H., & Liang, Y. C. (2016). On the spectrum- and energy efficiency tradeoff in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 64(2), 490–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Xing, X., Jing, T., Cheng, W., Huo, Y., & Cheng, X. (2013). Spectrum prediction in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 20(2), 90–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Xing, X., Jing, T., Cheng, W., Huo, Y., Cheng, X., & Znati, T. (2014). Cooperative spectrum prediction in multi-PU multi-SU cognitive radio networks. Mobile Networks and Applications, 19(4), 502–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barnes, S. D., Maharaj, B. T., & Alfa, A. S. (2016). Cooperative prediction for cognitive radio networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 89(4), 1177–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eltom, H., Kandeepan, S., Liang, Y. C., Moran, B., & Evans, R. J. (2016). HMM based cooperative spectrum occupancy prediction using hard fusion. In IEEE international conference on communications workshops (pp. 669–675).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chatziantoniou, E., Allen, B. & Velisavljevic, V. (2013). An HMM-based spectrum occupancy predictor for energy efficient cognitive radio. In IEEE international symposium on personal indoor and mobile radio communications (pp. 601–605).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ahmadi, H., Chew, Y. H., Tang, P. K., & Nijsure, Y. A. (2011). Predictive opportunistic spectrum access using learning based hidden Markov models. In IEEE international symposium on personal indoor and mobile radio communications (pp. 401–405).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ahmadi, H., Macaluso, I., & DaSilva, L. A. (2013). The effect of the spectrum opportunities diversity on opportunistic access. In IEEE international conference on communications (pp. 2829–2834).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Macaluso, I., Finn, D., Ozgul, B., & DaSilva, L. A. (2013). Complexity of spectrum activity and benefits of reinforcement learning for dynamic channel selection. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 31(11), 2237–2248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Macaluso, I., Ahmadi, H., & DaSilva, L. A. (2015). Fungible orthogonal channel sets for multi-user exploitation of spectrum. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 14(4), 2281–2293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yang, J., Zhao, H. S., Chen, X., Xu, J. Y., & Zhang, J. Z. (2014). Energy-efficient design of spectrum prediction in cognitive radio networks: Prediction strategy and communication environment. Prediction strategy and communication environment. In International conference on signal processing (pp. 154–158).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tumuluru, V. K., Wang, P., & Niyato, D. (2012). Channel status prediction for cognitive radio networks. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 12(10), 862–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yang, J., & Zhao, H. (2015). Enhanced throughput of cognitive radio networks by imperfect spectrum prediction. IEEE Communications Letters, 19(10), 1738–1741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bhowmick, A., Yadav, K., Roy, S. D., & Kundu, S. (2017). Throughput of an energy harvesting cognitive radio network based on prediction of primary user. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66(9), 8119–8128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thakur, P., Kumar, A., Pandit, S., Singh, G., & Satashia, S. N. (2017). Performance analysis of high-traffic cognitive radio communication system using hybrid spectrum access, prediction and monitoring techniques. Wireless Networks.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-016-1440-7.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rabiner, L. R. (1989). A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 77(2), 257–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations