Advertisement

Wireless Networks

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 1265–1278 | Cite as

Efficient cooperative multicarrier underwater acoustic communication over the Persian Gulf channel

  • Abdollah Doosti-Aref
  • Ataollah Ebrahimzadeh
Article

Abstract

Real-time and reliable transmission with high data rate is one of the most crucial design issues in underwater acoustic (UWA) communications. This paper is part of an operational project in the Persian Gulf which is known as a shallow water channel worldwide. Building on the promising combination of cooperative and multicarrier techniques, we first address the design of an efficient UWA communication system over the Persian Gulf channel. We assume sparse and frequency-selective Rician fading, non-white correlated Gaussian ambient noise, and non-uniform Doppler distortion among subcarriers. Based on the extensive field measurements, we adopt a comprehensive channel model including modified sound speed profile, modified absorption coefficient, reflections from the surface and bottom of the sea, and modified ambient noise model. In our work, carrier frequency is efficiently determined based on the system and environmental parameters. In addition, a simple criterion for Doppler scale calculation is proposed. Moreover, based on the approximate auto-correlation function of the ambient noise, whitening filter is utilized at the receiver. In many applications of underwater acoustic sensors network (UW-ASN), nodes may not be big enough to have more than one antenna. Therefore, to achieve spatial diversity, cooperation between nodes can be a proper alternate method. In another part of this research, toward a proper approach that each node operates under full-duplex mode, we address a cooperative virtually-aided transmission scenario which is called cooperative multiple input single output. Simulation results demonstrate that our proposed models can significantly improve the bit error rate performance of UW-ASN in the Persian Gulf channel.

Keywords

Cooperative multicarrier transmission CMISO OFDM Persian Gulf Underwater acoustic channel 

References

  1. 1.
    Kumar, P., Trivedi, V. K., & Kumar, P. (2015, February). Recent trends in multicarrier underwater acoustic communications. In Underwater technology (UT), 2015 IEEE (pp. 1–8). IEEE.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Martins, M. S., Pinto, N., Carmo, J. P., & Cabral, J. (2014, August). High data rate acoustic modem for underwater applications. In Telecommunications symposium (ITS), 2014 international (pp. 1–5). IEEE.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ahmed, S., Javaid, N., Khan, F. A., Durrani, M. Y., Ali, A., Shaukat, A., et al. (2015). Co-UWSN: Cooperative energy-efficient protocol for underwater WSNs. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 2015, 75.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tu, K., Duman, T. M., Proakis, J. G., & Stojanovic, M. (2010, November). Cooperative MIMO-OFDM communications: Receiver design for Doppler-distorted underwater acoustic channels. In Signals, systems and computers (ASILOMAR), 2010 conference record of the forty fourth asilomar conference on (pp. 1335–1339). IEEE.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Al-Dharrab, S., Uysal, M., & Duman, T. M. (2013). Cooperative underwater acoustic communications [Accepted From Open Call]. Communications Magazine, IEEE, 51(7), 146–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Uysal, M. (Ed.). (2009). Cooperative communications for improved wireless network transmission: Framework for virtual antenna array applications: Framework for virtual antenna array applications. Hershey: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhou, S., & Wang, Z. H. (2014). OFDM for underwater acoustic communications. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cheng, X. (2016). Reliable and energy-efficient cooperative OFDM communications over underwater acoustic channels (Doctoral dissertation, Colorado State University. Libraries).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wan, L., Zhou, H., Wilson, D., Hanson, J., Zhou, S., & Shi, Z. (2014). Analysis of underwater OFDM performance during a 2-month deployment in Chesapeake Bay. Marine Technology Society Journal, 48(6), 52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen, Y., Wang, Z., Wan, L., Zhou, H., Zhou, S., & Xu, X. (2015). OFDM-modulated dynamic coded cooperation in underwater acoustic channels. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 40(1), 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yan, H., Wan, L., Zhou, S., Shi, Z., Cui, J. H., Huang, J., et al. (2012). DSP based receiver implementation for OFDM acoustic modems. Physical Communication, 5(1), 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li, C., Xu, Y., Wang, Q., Diao, B., An, Z., Chen, Z., & Luo, Z. (2016). FDCA: A full-duplex collision avoidance MAC protocol for underwater acoustic networks.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yang, J., Zhang, J., & Qiao, G. (2014, November). Full-duplex, relative clock based and collision free protocol for underwater acoustic networks. In Proceedings of the international conference on underwater networks and systems (pp. 29–35). ACM.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Nouri, H., Uysal, M., & Panayirci, E. (2016). Information theoretical performance analysis and optimisation of cooperative underwater acoustic communication systems. IET Communications, 10(7), 812–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Naderi, M., Patzold, M., & Zajic, A. G. (2014, July). A geometry-based channel model for shallow underwater acoustic channels under rough surface and bottom scattering conditions. In Communications and electronics (ICCE), 2014 IEEE fifth international conference on (pp. 112–117). IEEE.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    van Walree, P. A., & Otnes, R. (2013). Ultrawideband underwater acoustic communication channels. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 38(4), 678–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Qarabaqi, P., & Stojanovic, M. (2013). Statistical characterization and computationally efficient modeling of a class of underwater acoustic communication channels. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 38(4), 701–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kim, S. M., Byun, S. H., Kim, S. G., Kim, D. J., Kim, S., & Lim, Y. K. (2013). Underwater acoustic channel characterization at 6 and 12 kHz in a shallow water near Jeju island. In Proc. Oceans (pp. 1–4), San Diego, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Aref, A. D., & Arand, B. A. (2010, December). Design and simulation of a new model for shallow water multipath acoustic channel in the Persian Gulf. In Telecommunications (IST), 2010 5th international symposium on (pp. 882–888). IEEE.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Aref, A. D., Jannati, M., & Vakili, V. T. (2011). Design and simulation of a secure and robust underwater acoustic communication system in the Persian Gulf. Communications and Network, 3, 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Aref, A. D. (2016). Enhanced cooperative underwater acoustic communication over the Persian Gulf channel (Doctoral Dissertation, Babol University of technology. In Persian).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Medwin, H., & Clay, C. S. (1997). Fundamentals of acoustical oceanography. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Francois, R. E., & Garrison, G. R. (1982). Sound absorption based on ocean measurements: Part I: Pure water and magnesium sulfate contributions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 72(3), 896–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Coates, R. F. (1990). Underwater acoustic systems. Hong Kong: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brekhovskikh, L. M., & Lysanov, Y. P. (2003). Fundamentals of ocean acoustics (3rd ed.). Berlin: Springer.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nabar, R. U., Bölcskei, H., & Kneubühler, F. W. (2004). Fading relay channels: Performance limits and space-time signal design. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 22(6), 1099–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Alamouti, S. M. (1998). A simple transmit diversity technique for wireless communications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 16(8), 1451–1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wan, L., Wang, Z., Zhou, S., Yang, T. C., & Shi, Z. (2012). Performance comparison of Doppler scale estimation methods for underwater acoustic OFDM. Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2012, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li, B., Zhou, S., Stojanovic, M., & Freitag, L. (2006, September). Pilot-tone based ZP-OFDM demodulation for an underwater acoustic channel. In OCEANS 2006 (pp. 1–5). IEEE.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mason, S. F., Berger, C. R., Zhou, S., & Willett, P. (2008). Detection, synchronization, and Doppler scale estimation with multicarrier waveforms in underwater acoustic communication. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 26(9), 1638–1649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yao, Y., & Giannakis, G. B. (2005). Blind carrier frequency offset estimation in SISO, MIMO, and multiuser OFDM systems. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 53(1), 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Babol University of TechnologyBabolIran
  2. 2.Faculty of Electrical and Computer EngineeringBabol University of TechnologyBabolIran

Personalised recommendations