Transcriptional regulator GntR of Brucella abortus regulates cytotoxicity, induces the secretion of inflammatory cytokines and affects expression of the type IV secretion system and quorum sensing system in macrophages

  • Zhiqiang Li
  • Shuli Wang
  • Hui Zhang
  • Jinliang Zhang
  • Li Xi
  • Junbo Zhang
  • Chuangfu Chen
Article

Abstract

The pathogenic mechanisms of Brucella are still poorly understood. GntR is a transcriptional regulator and plays an important role in the intracellular survival of Brucella. To investigate whether GntR is involved in the cytotoxicity of Brucella abortus (B. abortus), we created a 2308ΔgntR mutant of B. abortus 2308 (S2308). Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) cytotoxicity assays using a murine macrophage cell line (RAW 264.7) show that high-dose infection with the parental strain produces a high level of cytotoxicity to macrophages, but the 2308ΔgntR mutant exhibits a very low level of cytotoxicity, indicating that mutation of GntR impairs the cytotoxicity of B. abortus to macrophages. After the macrophages are infected with 2308ΔgntR, the levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-8 (IL-8) increase and are slightly higher than that for the S2308 infected group, indicating that the 2308ΔgntR mutant could induce the secretion of inflammatory cytokines. The virulence factor detection experiments indicate that genes involved in the type IV secretion system (T4SS) and quorum sensing system (QSS) are down-regulated in 2308ΔgntR. The lower levels of survival of 2308ΔgntR under various stress conditions and the increased sensitivity of 2308ΔgntR to polymyxin B suggest that GntR is a virulence factor and that deletion of gntR reduces of B. abortus to stress conditions. Taken together, our results demonstrate that GntR is involved in the cytotoxicity, virulence and intracellular survival of B. abortus during its infection.

Keywords

Brucella 2308ΔgntR Cytotoxicity Virulence 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31602080, 31502067), the Foundation of the Technology Department of Henan Province (172102310335), the Foundation of the Education Department of Henan Province (16A230013), and the Key Cultivation Project of Shangqiu Normal University (50014101).

References

  1. Aroian R, van der Goot FG (2007) Pore-forming toxins and cellular non-immune defenses (CNIDs). Curr Opin Microbiol 10:57–61. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2006.12.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cui M et al (2013) Impact of Hfq on global gene expression and intracellular survival in Brucella melitensis. PLoS ONE 8:e71933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071933 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. DiRusso CC, Nystrom T (1998) The fats of Escherichia coli during infancy and old age: regulation by global regulators, alarmones and lipid intermediates. Mol Microbiol 27:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dong H, Liu W, Peng X, Jing Z, Wu Q (2013) The effects of MucR on expression of type IV secretion system, quorum sensing system and stress responses in Brucella melitensis. Vet Microbiol 166:535–542. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.06.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Elzer PH, Hagius SD, Davis DS, DelVecchio VG, Enright FM (2002) Characterization of the caprine model for ruminant brucellosis. Vet Microbiol 90:425–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Freeman BA, Rumack BH (1964) Cytopathogenic effect of Brucella spheroplasts on monocytes in tissue culture. J Bacteriol 88:1310–1315Google Scholar
  7. Gibbs EP (2005) Emerging zoonotic epidemics in the interconnected global community. Vet Rec 157:673–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Godfroid J et al (2005) From the discovery of the Malta fever’s agent to the discovery of a marine mammal reservoir, brucellosis has continuously been a re-emerging zoonosis. Vet Res 36:313–326. doi: 10.1051/vetres:2005003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gorvel JP, Moreno E (2002) Brucella intracellular life: from invasion to intracellular replication. Vet Microbiol 90:281–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haine V et al (2005) Systematic targeted mutagenesis of Brucella melitensis 16 M reveals a major role for GntR regulators in the control of virulence. Infect Immun 73:5578–5586. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.9.5578-5586.2005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hanssler E et al (2007) FarR, a putative regulator of amino acid metabolism in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 76:625–632. doi: 10.1007/s00253-007-0929-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kang OH et al (2009) Anti-inflammatory mechanisms of resveratrol in activated HMC-1 cells: pivotal roles of NF-kappaB and MAPK. Pharmacol Res 59:330–337. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2009.01.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li Z et al (2015a) TceSR two-component regulatory system of Brucella melitensis 16 M is involved in invasion, intracellular survival and regulated cytotoxicity for macrophages. Lett Appl Microbiol 60:565–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li Z et al (2015b) Immunization of BALB/c mice with Brucella abortus 2308∆wbkA confers protection against wild-type infection. J Vet Sci 16:467–473. doi: 10.4142/jvs.2015.16.4.467 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li J et al (2016) Baicalein inhibits TNF-α-induced NF-κB activation and expression of NF-κB-regulated target gene products. Oncol Rep 36:2771–2776. doi: 10.3892/or.2016.5108 Google Scholar
  16. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−∆∆CT) method. Methods 25:402–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Martinez de Tejada G, Pizarro-Cerda J, Moreno E, Moriyon I (1995) The outer membranes of Brucella spp. are resistant to bactericidal cationic peptides. Infect Immun 63:3054–3061Google Scholar
  18. Morawski B, Segura A, Ornston LN (2000) Repression of Acinetobacter vanillate demethylase synthesis by VanR, a member of the GntR family of transcriptional regulators. FEMS Microbiol Lett 187:65–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pei J, Ficht TA (2004) Brucella abortus rough mutants are cytopathic for macrophages in culture. Infect Immun 72:440–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pei J, Turse JE, Wu Q, Ficht TA (2006) Brucella abortus rough mutants induce macrophage oncosis that requires bacterial protein synthesis and direct interaction with the macrophage. Infect Immun 74:2667–2675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pei J, Wu Q, Kahl-McDonagh M, Ficht TA (2008) Cytotoxicity in macrophages infected with rough Brucella mutants is type IV secretion system dependent. Infect Immun 76:30–37. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00379-07 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Peri F, Piazza M, Calabrese V, Damore G, Cighetti R (2010) Exploring the LPS/TLR4 signal pathway with small molecules. Biochem Soc Trans 38:1390–1395. doi: 10.1042/BST0381390 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rigali S et al (2006) The sugar phosphotransferase system of Streptomyces coelicolor is regulated by the GntR-family regulator DasR and links N-acetylglucosamine metabolism to the control of development. Mol Microbiol 61:1237–1251. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05319.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Roop RM II, Gaines JM, Anderson ES, Caswell CC, Martin DW (2009) Survival of the fittest: how Brucella strains adapt to their intracellular niche in the host. Med Microbiol Immunol 198:221–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Uzureau S et al (2010) Global analysis of quorum sensing targets in the intracellular pathogen Brucella melitensis 16 M. J Proteome Res 9:3200–3217. doi: 10.1021/pr100068p CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang Y et al (2009) Comparative proteomics analyses reveal the virB of B. melitensis affects expression of intracellular survival related proteins. PLoS ONE 4:e5368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005368 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang Y et al (2010) The type IV secretion system affects the expression of Omp25/Omp31 and the outer membrane properties of Brucella melitensis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 303:92–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01866.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang Y et al (2011) The 16M∆ vjbR as an ideal live attenuated vaccine candidate for differentiation between Brucella vaccination and infection. Vet Microbiol 151:354–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang Y et al (2013) Sufficient intracellular survival capability is essential for induction of protective immune response by the Brucella live attenuated vaccine M5-90. Afri J Microbiol Res 7:4107–4116Google Scholar
  30. Wang Z, Wang S, Wu Q (2014) Cold shock protein A plays an important role in the stress adaptation and virulence of Brucella melitensis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 354:27–36. doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12430 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Watanabe T, Inoue R, Kimura N, Furukawa K (2000) Versatile transcription of biphenyl catabolic bph operon in Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes KF707. J Biol Chem 275:31016–31023. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M003023200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhong Z et al (2009) Cytotoxicity of Brucella smooth strains for macrophages is mediated by increased secretion of the type IV secretion system. Microbiology 155:3392–3402CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhiqiang Li
    • 1
  • Shuli Wang
    • 1
  • Hui Zhang
    • 2
  • Jinliang Zhang
    • 1
  • Li Xi
    • 1
  • Junbo Zhang
    • 3
  • Chuangfu Chen
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Biotechnology and FoodShangqiu Normal UniversityShangqiuPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.College of Animal Science and TechnologyShihezi UniversityShiheziPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.College of Biology, Agriculture and ForestryTongren UniversityTongrenPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations