Bioethanol production from steam-exploded rice husk by recombinant Escherichia coli KO11

  • Takamitsu Tabata
  • Yusuke Yoshiba
  • Tomonori Takashina
  • Kazuo Hieda
  • Norio Shimizu
Original Paper
  • 285 Downloads

Abstract

Rice husk is one of the most abundant types of lignocellulosic biomass. Because of its significant amount of sugars, such as cellulose and hemicellulose, it can be used for the production of biofuels such as bioethanol. However, the complex structure of lignocellulosic biomass, consisting of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin, is resistant to degradation, which limits biomass utilization for ethanol production. The protection of cellulose by lignin contributes to the recalcitrance of lignocelluloses to hydrolysis. Therefore, we conducted steam-explosion treatment as pretreatment of rice husk. However, recombinant Escherichia coli KO11 did not ferment the reducing sugar solution obtained by enzymatic saccharification of steam-exploded rice husk. When the steam-exploded rice husk was washed with hot water to remove inhibitory substances and M9 medium (without glucose) was used as a fermentation medium, E. coli KO11 completely fermented the reducing sugar solution obtained by enzymatic saccharification of hot water washing-treated steam-exploded rice husk to ethanol. We report here the efficient production of bioethanol using steam-exploded rice husk.

Keywords

Bioethanol Escherichia coli KO11 Inhibition Rice husk Steam explosion 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by a Grant for the Program for the Strategic Research Foundation at Private Universities S1101017 since April 2011 (to NS).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Abbas A, Ansumali S (2010) Global potential of rice husk as a renewable feedstock for ethanol biofuel production. Bioenergy Res 3:328–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balat M, Balat H, Öz C (2008) Progress in bioethanol processing. Prog Energy Combust Sci 34:551–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beldman G, Searle-van leeuwen MF, Rombouts FM, Voragen FGJ (1985) The cellulase of Trichoderma viride purification, characterization and comparison of all detectable endoglucanases, exoglucanases and ß-glucosidases. Eur J Biochem 146:301–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bin Y, Hongzhang C (2010) Effect of the ash on enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-exploded rice straw. Bioresour Technol 101:9114–9119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Miller GL (1959) Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem 31:426–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Moniruzzaman M, Ingram LO (1998) Ethanol production from dilute acid hydrolysate of rice hulls using genetically engineered Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Lett 20:943–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ohta K, Beall DS, Mejia JP, Shanmugam KT, Ingram LO (1991) Genetic improvement of Escherichia coli for ethanol production: chromosomal integration of Zymomonas mobilis genes encoding pyruvate decarboxylase and alcohol dehydrogenase II. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:893–900Google Scholar
  8. Ramos LP (2003) The chemistry involved in the steam treatment of lignocellulosic materials. Quim Nova 26:863–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sarkar N, Ghosh SK, Bannerjee S, Aikat K (2012) Bioethanol production from agricultural wastes: an review. Renew Energy 37:19–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Taherzadeh MJ, Gustafsson L, Niklasson C, Lidén G (2000) Inhibition effects of furfural on aerobic batch cultivation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae growing on ethanol and/or acetic acid. J Biosci Bioeng 90:374–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Takahashi CM, de Carvalho Lima KG, Takahashi DF, Alterthum F (2000) Fermentation of sugar cane bagasse hemicellulosic hydrolysate and sugar mixtures to ethanol by recombinant Escherichia coli KO11. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 16:829–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tanahashi T, Tamabuchi K, Goto T, Aoki T, Karina M, Higuchi T (1988) Characterization of steam-explodeed wood II: chemical changes of wood components by steam explosion. Wood Res 75:1–12Google Scholar
  13. Wang X, Yomano LP, Lee JY, York SW, Zheng H, Mullinnix MT, Shanmugam KT, Ingram LO (2013) Engineering furfural tolerance in Escherichia coli improves the fermentation of lignocellulosic sugars into renewable chemicals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:4021–4026CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Life SciencesToyo UniversityGunmaJapan
  2. 2.Frontier Foods Co. Ltd.TokyoJapan
  3. 3.Bio-Nano Electronics Research CenterToyo UniversitySaitamaJapan

Personalised recommendations