Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Investigating Attitudes towards Water Savings, Price Increases, and Willingness to Pay among Italian University Students

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Knowledge of attitudes towards water conservation, potential reactions to incorporating supplementary costs into water prices, and the willingness to pay for water services is vitally important to decision makers wishing to implement policies that effectively promote more conscious water consumption and mitigate increasingly important water scarcity issues. This study aims to examine the relationships among these dimensions and their potential explanatory factors—such as family values, knowledge about problems related to water scarcity, attitude and propensity to pro-environmental behavior, and social pressure that individuals receive to behave in a certain manner—through a sample survey on 429 students enrolled at the University of Pisa (Italy). A set of hypotheses were formulated among eight latent variables that reflect the previous constructs and were tested through a structural equation model. As for key findings, we highlight the importance of family values as the main determinant of pro-environmental behaviors, which result in more responsible water use, greater support for price increases to encourage water saving practices, and a greater willingness to pay more for improved water and water service quality. Policymakers should consider these findings when developing policies and strategies to incentivize effective water saving practices among younger generations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitken C, McMahon T, Wearing A, Finlayson B (1994) Residential water use: predicting and reducing consumption. J Appl Soc Psychol 21:611–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I (1985) From intention to action: a theory of planned behaviour. In: Kuhl J, Beckmann J (eds) Action control, from cognition to behavior. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 11–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi RP, Yi Y (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. Acad Market Sci 16(1):76–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldassare M, Katz C (1992) The personal threat of environmental problems as predictor of environmental practices. Environ Behav 24(5):602–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barraqué B (2011) Is individual metering socially sustainable? The case of multifamily housing in France. Water Alternatives 4(2):223–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen KA (1989) Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chawla L (1998) Significant life experiences revisited: a review of research on sources of pro-environmental sensitivity. J Environ Educ 29(3):11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corral-Verdugo V, Bechtel RB, Fraijo-Sing B (2003) Environmental beliefs and water conservation: an empirical study. J Environ Psychol 23:247–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotton D, Shiel C, Paço A (2016) Energy saving on campus: a comparison of students’ attitudes and reported behaviours in the UK and Portugal. J Clean Prod 129:586–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolnicar S, Hurlimann A, Grun B (2012) Water conservation behavior in Australia. J Environ Manag 105:44–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap RE, Van Liere KD (1978) The “new environmental paradigm”: a proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. J Environ Educ 9:10–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap RE, Van Liere KD, Mertig AG, Jones RE (2000) New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. J Soc Issues 56(3):425–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding KS, Spinks A, Russell S, McCrea R, Stewart R, Gardner J (2013) An experimental test of voluntary strategies to promote urban water demand management. J Environ Manag 114:343–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genius M, Hatzaki E, Kouromichelaki EM, Kouvakis G, Nikiforaki S, Tsagarakis KP (2008) Evaluating consumer’s willingness to pay for improved potable water quality and quantity. Water Resour Manag 22:1825–1834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilg A, Barr S (2006) Behavioural attitudes towards water saving? Evidence from a study of environmental actions. Ecol Econ 57(3):400–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafton RQ, Ward MB, To H, Kompas T (2011) Determinants of residential water consumption: evidence and analysis from a 10-country household survey. Water Resour Res 47(8):1–14

  • Gregory GD, Di Leo M (2003) Repeated behavior and environmental psychology: the role of personal involvement and habit formation in explaining water consumption. J Appl Soc Psychology 33:1261–1296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grønhøj A, Thøgersen J (2012) Action speaks louder than words: the effect of personal attitudes and family norms on adolescents’ pro-environmental behaviour. J Econ Psychol 33:292–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JFJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (2010) Multivariate data analysis, 7th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra AY, Chapagain AK (2007) Water footprints of nations: water use by people as a function of their consumption pattern. Water Resour Manag 21(1):35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlimann A, Dolnicar S, Meyer P (2009) Understanding behaviour to inform water supply management in developed nations—a review of literature, conceptual model and research agenda. J Environ Manag 91:47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inman D, Jeffrey P (2006) A review of residential water conservation tool performance and influences on implementation effectiveness. Urban Water J 3:127–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISTAT (2017) Ambiente Urbano, retrieved from http://www.istat.it/it/archivio/207482. Accessed 11 May 2018

  • Kalish S, Nelson P (1991) A comparison of ranking, rating and reservation price measurement in conjoint analysis. Mark Lett 2(4):327–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2002) Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ Educ Res 8(3):239–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March H, Saurí D (2010) The suburbanization of water scarcity in the Barcelona metropolitan region: sociodemographic and urban changes influencing domestic water consumption. Prof Geogr 62:32–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Espineira R, Nauges C (2004) Is all domestic water consumption sensitive to price control? Appl Econ 36(15):1697–1703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer A (2016) Heterogeneity in the preferences and pro-environmental behavior of college students: the effects of years on campus, demographics, and external factors. J Clean Prod 112:3451–3463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén B (1984) A general structural equation model with dichotomous ordered categorical and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika 49(1):115–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén LK, Muthén BO (1998–2010) Mplus user’s guide, 6th edn. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Nataraj S, Hanemann WM (2011) Does marginal price matter? A regression discontinuity approach to estimating water demand. J Environ Econ Manag 61:198–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier LG, Tuson KM, Green-Demers I, Noels K, Beaton AM (1998) Why are you doing things for the environment? The motivation toward the environment scale (MTES). J Appl Soc Psychol 28:437–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajecki DW (1982) Attitudes: themes and advances. Sinauer, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Renwick ME, Green RD (2000) Do residential water demand side management policies measure up? An analysis of eight California water agencies. J Environ Econ Manag 40(1):37–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romano G, Salvati N, Guerrini A (2014) Estimating the determinants of residential water demand in Italy. Water 6:2929–2945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romano G, Salvati N, Guerrini A (2015a) An empirical analysis of the determinants of water demand in Italy. J Clean Prod 130:74–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romano G, Guerrini A, Campedelli B (2015b) The new Italian water tariff method: a launching point for novel infrastructures or a backwards step? Util Policy 34:45–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rungie C, Scarpa R, Thiene M (2014) The influence of individuals in forming collective household preferences for water quality. J Environ Econ Manag 68:161–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saurí D (2013) Water conservation: theory and evidence in urban areas of the developed world. Annu Rev Environ Resour 38:227–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saz-Salazar S, García-Rubio M, González-Gómez F, Picazo-Tadeo A (2016) Managing water resources under conditions of scarcity: on consumers’ willingness to pay for improving water supply infrastructure. Water Resour Manag 30(5):1723–1738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varian HR (1992) Microeconomic analysis, vol 3. W.W. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Veronesi M, Chawla F, Maurer M, Lienert J (2014) Climate change and the willingness to pay to reduce ecological and health risks from wastewater flooding in urban centers and the environment. Ecol Econ 98:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welte T, Anastasio P (2010) To conserve or not to conserve: is status the question? Environ Behav 42(6):845–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wichman CJ, Taylor LO, von Haefen RH (2016) Conservation policies: who responds to price and who responds to prescription? J Environ Econ Manag 79:114–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis RM, Stewart RA, Panuwatwanich K, Williams PR, Hollingsworth AL (2011) Quantifying the influence of environmental and water conservation attitudes on household end use water consumption. J Environ Manag 92:1996–2009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the University of Pisa PRA and the European Union Jean Monnet Project [grant number 553224-EPP-1-2014-1-IT-EPPJMO-MODULE].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Pisa, Via C. Ridolfi, 10, 56124, Pisa, Italy

    Masserini Lucio, Romano Giulia & Corsini Lorenzo

Authors
  1. Masserini Lucio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Romano Giulia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Corsini Lorenzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Romano Giulia.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None

Appendix

Appendix

Table 1 Confirmatory factor analysis results
Full size table
Table 2 Empirical results and hypotheses
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 2

Path diagram of the theoretical model

Full size image

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lucio, M., Giulia, R. & Lorenzo, C. Investigating Attitudes towards Water Savings, Price Increases, and Willingness to Pay among Italian University Students. Water Resour Manage 32, 4123–4138 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2049-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2049-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation