Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pond and Irrigation Model (PIM): a Tool for Simultaneously Evaluating Pond Water Availability and Crop Irrigation Demand

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Agricultural ponds are an important alternative source of water for crop irrigation to conserve surface and ground water resources. In recent years more such ponds have been constructed in Mississippi and around the world. There is currently, however, a lack of a tool to simultaneously estimate crop irrigation demand and pond water availability. In this study, a Pond-Irrigation Model (PIM) was developed to meet this need using STELLA (Structural Thinking, Experiential Learning Laboratory with Animation) software. PIM simulated crop land and agricultural pond hydrological processes such as surface runoff, soil drainage, and evapotranspiration as well as crop irrigation demand and pond water availability. More importantly, PIM was able to decide when to conduct crop irrigation based on management allowable depletion (MAD) root zone soil water content and to determine optimal ratios of agricultural pond size to crop land with sufficient pond water available for crop irrigation. As a case demonstration, the model was applied to concomitantly estimate row crops (i.e., corn, cotton, and soybeans) water irrigation demand and pond water availability in a farm located at East-central Mississippi. Simulations revealed that corn used more soil water for growth than soybeans, whereas soybeans needed more irrigation water than corn and occurred due to less rainwater available for soybeans growth. We also found that there was one time for corn, zero time for cotton, and two times for soybeans when the pond water level was drawn to near zero for irrigation from 2005 to 2014. PIM developed in this study is a useful tool for estimating crop irrigation demand and pond water availability simultaneously.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abtew W (1996) Evapotranspiration measurements and modeling for three wetland systems in South Florida. J Am Water Resour Assoc 32:465–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abtew W (2005) Evapotranspiration in the Everglades: Comparison of Bowen Ratio measurements and model estimations. 2005 ASAE Annual International Meeting, Tampa, Florida. Paper Number: 052188

  • Ahuja LR, Ma L, Lascano RJ, editors (2016) Practical applications of agricultural system models to optimize the use of limited water: ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI

  • Carvajal F, Agüera F, Sánchez-Hermosilla J (2014) Water balance in artificial on-farm agricultural water reservoirs forthe irrigation of intensive greenhouse crops. Agric Water Manag 131:146–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow VT (1959) Open-Channel Hydraulics. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng G, Ouyang Y, Adeli A, Read J, Jenkins J (2017) Rainfall deficit and irrigation demand for major row crops in the Blackland Prairie of Mississippi. Soil Sci Soc Am J. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2017.06.0190

  • Jones JW, Hoogenboom G, Porter CH, Boote KJ, Batchelor WD, Hunt LA, Wilkens PW, Singh U, Gijsman AJ, Ritchie JT (2003) DSSAT cropping system model. Eur J Agron 18:235–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kebede H, Fisher DK, Sui RX, Reddy KN (2014) Irrigation methods and scheduling in the Delta region of Mississippi: Current status and strategies to improve irrigation efficiency. Am J Plant Sci 5:2917–2928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konikow LF (2013) Groundwater depletion in the United States (1900–2008): U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2013–5079, 63 p., http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2013/5079

  • MSU Extension Service (2014) Mississippi Agricultural Statistics Service, Jackson, MS. http://www.dafvm.msstate.edu/factbook.pdf

  • Mullins JA, Carsel RF, Scarbrough JE, Ivery AM (1993) PRZM-2, a model for predicting pesticides fate in the crop root and unsaturated soil zones: User manual for release 2.0, US-EPA, Athens, GA

  • Ouyang Y, Feng G, Read J, Leininger TD, Jenkins JN (2016) Estimating the ratio of pond size to irrigated soybean land in Mississippi: A case study. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 16:1639–1647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang Y, Paz JO, Feng G, Read J, Adeli A, Jenkins JN (2017) A model to estimate hydrological processes and water budget from an irrigation farm pond in Mississippi. Water Resour Manag 31:2225–2241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozdogan M, Rodell M, Beaudoing HK, Toll DL (2010) Simulating the effects of irrigation over the United States in a land surface model based on satellite-derived agricultural data. J Hydrometeorol 11:171–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers S (2007) Agricultural Water Use in the Mississippi Delta. 37th Annual Mississippi Water Resources Conference, Jackson, Mississippi

  • Rawls WJ, Ahuja LR, Brakensiek DL, Shirmohammadi A (1992) Infiltration and soil water movement. Chapter. 5. In: Maidment DR (ed) Handbook of Hydrology. McGraw-Hill, Inc, New York, pp 5.1–5.51

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxton KE, Stockle CO, Bluhm GC (1992) Soil water and nitrate budgets with the enhanced SPAW model. Proc. Amer. Water Res. Assoc., Nov.1–5, 1992, Reno, NV, pp. 269–270

  • Vories ED, Evett SR (2014) Irrigation challenges in the sub-humid US Mid-South. Int J Water 8:259–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • YMD (Yazoo Mississippi Delta Joint Water Management District) 2015 Groundwater monitoring, a primary YMD activity for 25 years. (http://myemail.constantcontact.com/ YMD-Joint-Water-Management-District-May-21--2015.html?soid=1120967545567 &aid= AuOD6KeG9Sc. E-Newsletters, May 12, 2015

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project (62-2015) was funded by Mississippi Soybean Promotion Board.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying Ouyang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ouyang, Y., Feng, G., Leininger, T.D. et al. Pond and Irrigation Model (PIM): a Tool for Simultaneously Evaluating Pond Water Availability and Crop Irrigation Demand. Water Resour Manage 32, 2969–2983 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-1967-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-1967-8

Keywords

Navigation