The Influence of the Construction Technology in Time-Cost Relationships of Sewerage Projects
Time-cost models have been developed in various contexts to assist in forecasting the duration of different types of projects. The present research explores the influence of the construction technology on the time-cost relationship. For that purpose, the data from 21 sewerage projects using trenchless technology and from 49 sewerage projects using the traditional open-cut method was analyzed. The 70 sewerage projects analyzed were completed in Chicago, U.S., between 1994 and 2002. The influence of the construction technology in the time-cost relationship was found to be statistically significant and time-relationships were determined for sewerage projects using trenchless technology and the traditional open-cut method. Furthermore, along with the Bromilow type models an alternative approach was tested using the time normalized by the project cost as dependent variable, allowing additional insight into the time performance of the open-cut and lining technology used (cured in place).
KeywordsTime-cost relationship Sewerage Open-cut technology Lining technology
VS acknowledges the financial support from IST – Universidade de Lisboa (Start Up – 4835) and the Portuguese National Science Foundation (grant SFRH/BSAB/113784/2015) for the sabbatical leave at École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne where part of this work was carried out.
- Alfred LE (1988) Construction productivity – on site measurement and management. McGraw-Hill, SydneyGoogle Scholar
- Bromilow FJ (1969) Contract time performance—expectation and the reality. Build Forum 1(3):70–80Google Scholar
- Chitkara K (2001) Construction project management techniques and practice. Tata McGraw-Hill, New DeliGoogle Scholar
- Choudhury I, Rajan SS (2003) Time-cost relationship for residential construction in Texas. Constr Inf Digit Libr w78-2003-73Google Scholar
- CIDA (1993) Project performance update – a report on the cost and time performance of Australian building projects completed 1988–1993. Construction Industry Development Agency, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- EPA (2006) Emerging technologies for conveyance systems - new installations and rehabilitation methods. Handbook, EPA 832-R-06-004, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Wastewater Management, Washington, D.C., USAGoogle Scholar
- Marchionni V, Cabral M, Amado C, Covas D (2016) Estimating water supply infrastructure cost using regression techniques. J Water Res PL-ASCE 142(4). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000627
- Martin J, Burrows T, Pegg I (2006) Predicting construction duration of building projects. Shaping the Change, XXIII FIG Congress, Munich, Germany, October 8-13Google Scholar
- NEDO (1988) Faster building for commerce. National Economic Development Office (NEDO). Millbank, UKGoogle Scholar
- Sousa V (2012) Risk management in construction: application to urban drainage projects. Ph.D. Thesis, IST – Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal. (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
- Walker DHT (1994) An investigation into factors that determine building construction time performance. PhD thesis, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- Yousef G, Baccarini D (2001) Developing a cost–time model for estimating construction durations of sewerage projects in Perth, Western Australia. J Constr Res 2(2):213–220Google Scholar