Effects of Hedging Factors and Fuzziness on Shortage Characteristics During Droughts
Frequently suffering from water deficits induced by prolonged and severe droughts in Taiwan, hedging rules become an important component in reservoir operation to ensure stable water supplies during droughts. Conventional zone-based rule-curve operation is an easy rule to guide water releases since fixed rationing factors are assigned for various zones. A drawback for such hedging is abrupt changes of rationing factors from one zone to another. Fuzzified rule curves provide an alternative to create gradually varied rationing factors. In this study, impacts of hedging factors including rule curves, rationing factors, and fuzziness on water-deficit characteristics are explored. The method presented in this study is illustrated through an application to the Nanhua Reservoir located in southern Taiwan. The results reveal that different hedging factors have different impacts on shortage indices. More hedging factors involved in optimization models leads to more compromising hedging among conflicting shortage indices. According to the proposed overall index, which is a multi-criteria index based on normalized shortage indices, the current operation leads to the worst overall performance of 0.480. One-optimized-hedging-factor scenarios receive an improvement and range between 0.541 and 0.607, while the two-optimized-hedging-factor scenarios have a further improved overall index of 0.603−0.659. The best overall performance of 0.679 is achieved by optimizing three hedging factors and results in the most compromising alternative among all scenarios.
KeywordsDroughts Hedging Fuzzy Reservoir operation Multi-criteria optimization
Financial support for this study was graciously provided by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, ROC (MOST 105-2221-E-006-041).
Source of funding of this study was provided by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, ROC (MOST 105–2221-E-006-041).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflicts of Interest
No potential conflicts of interest.
Human Participants and Animal Studies
No human participants and/or animals are involved in this study.
- Ahmadianfar I, Adib A, Taghian M (2016) Optimization of fuzzified hedging rules for multipurpose and multireservoir systems. J Hydrol Eng 21(4):05016003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001329 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cancelliere A, Ancarani A, Rossi G (1998) Susceptibility of water supply reservoir to drought conditions. J Hydrol Eng 3(2):140–148. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1998)3:2(140) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Draper AJ, Lund JR (2004) Optimal hedging and carryover storage value. J Water Resour Plan Manag 130(1):83–87. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2004)130:1(83) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dubrovin T, Jolma A, Turunen E (2002) Fuzzy model for real-time reservoir operation. J Water Resour Plan Manag 128(1):66–73. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2002)128:1(66) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Han JC, Huang GH, Zhang H, Zhuge YS, He L (2012) Fuzzy constrained optimization of eco-friendly reservoir operation using self-adaptive genetic algorithm: a case study of a cascade reservoir system in the Yalong River, China. Ecohology 5(6):768–778Google Scholar
- Kindler J (1992) Rationalizing water requirements with aid of fuzzy allocation model. J Water Resour Plan Manag 118(3):308–323. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1992)118:3(308) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kumari S, Mujumdar PP (2015) Reservoir operation with fuzzy state variables for irrigation of multiple crops. J Irrig Drain Eng 141(11):04015015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000893 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Russell SO, Campbell PF (1996) Reservoir operating rules with fuzzy programming. J Water Resour Plan Manag 122(3):165–170. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1996)122:3(165) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shiau JT (2003) Water release policy effects on the shortage characteristics for the Shihmen reservoir system during droughts. Water Resour Manag 17(6):463–480. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:WARM.0000004958.93250.8a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shiau JT (2009) Optimization of reservoir hedging rules using multiobjective genetic algorithm. J Water Resour Plan Manag 135(5):355–363. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2009)135:5(355) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Taghian M, Rosbjerg D, Haghighi A, Madsen H (2014) Optimization of conventional rule curves coupled with hedging rules for reservoir operation. J Water Resour Plan Manag 140(5):693–698. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000355 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhu FL, Zhong PA, Xu B, Wu YN, Zhang Y (2016) A multi-criteria decision making model dealing with correlation among criteria for reservoir flood control operation. J Hydroinf 18(3):531–543Google Scholar