Water Resources Management

, Volume 32, Issue 5, pp 1759–1776 | Cite as

Streamflow and Hydrological Drought Trend Analysis and Forecasting in Cyprus

  • Dimitrios Myronidis
  • Konstantinos Ioannou
  • Dimitrios Fotakis
  • Gerald Dörflinger
Article
  • 72 Downloads

Abstract

The persistent water shortage in Cyprus has been alleviated by importing freshwater from neighbouring countries, and severe droughts have been met with financial reimbursement from the EU at least twice. The goal of this research is to investigate and perform short-term forecasting of both streamflow and hydrological drought trends over the island. Eleven hydrometric stations with a 34-year common record length of the mean daily discharge from 10/1979 to 09/2013 are used for this purpose, with the relevant upstream catchments considered to represent pristine conditions. The Streamflow Drought Index (SDI) successfully captures the hydrological drought conditions over the island, and the performance of the index is validated based on both the historic drought archives and results from other drought indices for the island. The Mann–Kendall (M-K) test reveals that the annual and seasonal time series of the discharge volumes always illustrate a decreasing but insignificant trend at a significance level of a = 0.05; additionally, the decrease per decade in the average annual streamflow volume based on Sen’s slope statistic is approximately −9.4%. The M-K test on the SDI reveals that drought conditions intensified with time. Ten autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models are built and used to forecast the mean monthly streamflow values with moderate accuracy; the best ARIMA forecast model in each catchment is derived by comparing two model-performance statistical measures for the different (p,d,q) model parameters. The predicted discharge values are processed by the SDI-3 index, revealing that non-drought conditions are expected in most catchments in the upcoming three months, although mild-drought conditions are anticipated for catchments 7, 8 and 9.

Keywords

Streamflow drought index M-K test ARIMA 

Notes

Acknowledgements

A portion of this research was conducted during the Erasmus + International Staff Mobility for Training mission of D. Myronidis, which was held at the Department of Geography and Environmental Studies of Israel’s Haifa University from 8/5/2017 to 12/5/2017. Additionally, the authors thank the Cypriot authorities of the Water Development Department (WDD) for supplying the streamflow data. Finally, the insightful comments and suggestions made by the two anonymous reviewers and the editor significantly improved the quality of the present paper.

References

  1. Alexandersson H (1986) A. Homogeneity Test Applied to Precipitation Data. Int J Climatol 6:661–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amirataee B, Montaseri M (2017) The performance of SPI and PNPI in analyzing the spatial and temporal trend of dry and wet periods over Iran. Nat Hazards 86:89–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amirataee B, Montaseri M, Sanikhani H (2016) The analysis of trend variations of reference evapotranspiration via eliminating the significance effect of all autocorrelation coefficients. Theor Appl Climatol 126(1):131–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Batelis SH, Nalbantis I (2014) Potential Effects of Forest Fires on Streamflow in the Enipeas River Basin. Thessaly. Greece. Environ Process 1:73–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Birsan MV, Zaharia L, Chendes V, Branescu E (2014) Seasonal trends in Romanian streamflow. Hydrol Process 28:4496–4505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boggs K, Kirk R, Johnson G, Fairley J (2014) Forecast of natural aquifer discharge using a data driven, statistical approach. Groundwater 52(6):853–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Box G, Jenkins G (1976) Time series analysis: Forecasting and control. Holden-Day, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  8. Burn D, Elnur M (2002) Detection of hydrologic trends and variability. J Hydrol 255:107–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chin WW (1998) The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In: Marcoulides GA (ed) Modern Methods for Business Research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 295–358Google Scholar
  10. Choudhury P, Ullah N (2014) Downstream flow top width prediction in a river system. Water SA 40(3):481–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. COM 46 (2017) Accompanying the proposal to mobilise the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to the United Kingdom. Cyprus and Portugal. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2017:0046:FIN. Accessed 24 Aug 2017
  12. Dörflinger G (2016) A new spatial basis for rivers monitoring and management in Cyprus. Dissertation, Middlesex University, pp 1–340. http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/20817
  13. Edossa DS, Babel MS, Gupta AD (2010) Drought Analysis in the Awash River Basin. Ethiopia. Water Resour Manag 24:1441–1460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. EUMED (2007) Mediterranean Water Scarcity and Drought Report. Technical report. http://www.emwis.net/topics/WaterScarcity. Accessed 24 Aug 2017
  15. Griggs C, Pearson C, Manning SW, Lorentzen B (2014) A 250-year annual precipitation reconstruction and drought assessment for Cyprus from Pinus brutia Ten. tree-rings. Int J Climatol 34:2702–2714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hamed KH, Rao AR (1998) A modified Mann–Kendall trend test for autocorrelated data. J Hydrol 204:182–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hirsch RM, Slack JR, Smith RA (1982) Techniques of trend analysis for monthly water quality data. Water Resour Res 18(1):107–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoffmann C (2017) From small streams to pipe dreams – the hydro-engineering of the Cyprus conflict. Mediterr Polit.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2016.1264137
  19. Hong X, Guo S, Zhou Y, Xiong L (2015) Uncertainties in assessing hydrological drought using streamflow drought index for the upper Yangtze River basin. Stoch Env Res Risk A 29:1235–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hu TS, Lam KC, Ng ST (2001) River flow time series prediction with a range-dependent neural network. Hydrol Sci J 46(5):729–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. IPCC (2007) Climate Change. Fourth Assessment Report of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel. IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar4/. Accessed 24 Aug 2017
  22. IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I. II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/. Accessed 24 Aug 2017
  23. Kahya E, Kalayc S (2004) Trend analysis of streamflow in Turkey. J Hydrol 289:128–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kendall MG (1962) Rank Correlation Methods. Hafner Publishing Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Koutroumanidis T, Ioannou K, Arabatzis G (2009) Predicting fuelwood prices in Greece with the use of ARIMA models, artificial neural networks and a hybrid ARIMA-ANN model. Energ Policy 37(9):3627–3634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Krstanovic F, Singh V (1991) A univariate model for long-term streamflow forecasting. Stoch Hydrol Hydraul 5:189–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kumar S, Merwade V, Kam J, Thurner K (2009) Streamflow trends in Indiana: Effects of long term persistence, precipitation and subsurface drains. J Hydrol 374:171–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lakhraj-Govender R, Grab S, Ndebele NE (2017) A homogenized long-term temperature record for the Western Cape Province in South Africa: 1916–2013. Int J Climatol 37:2337–2353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu W, Cai T, Fu G, Zhang A, Liu C, Yu H (2013) The streamflow trend in Tangwang River basin in northeast China and its difference response to climate and land use change in sub-basins. Environ Earth Sci 69:51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mann HB (1945) Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica 13:245–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Memarian H, Balasundram SK, Talib JB, Sood AM, Abbaspour KC (2012) Trend analysis of water discharge and sediment load during the past three decades of development in the Langat basin. Malaysia. Hydrol Sci J 57(6):1207–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Michaelides S, Pashiardis S (2008) Monitoring drought in Cyprus during the 2007– 2008 hydrometeorological year by using the standardized precipitation index (Spi). Eur Water 23(24):123–131Google Scholar
  33. Myronidis D, Stathis D, Ioannou K, Fotakis D (2012) An integration of statistics temporal methods to track the effect of drought in a shallow Mediterranean Lake. Water Resour Manag 26(15):4587–4605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nalbantis I (2008) Evaluation of a Hydrological Drought Index. Eur Water 23/24:67–77Google Scholar
  35. Nalbantis I, Tsakiris G (2009) Assessment of hydrological drought revisited. Water Resour Manag 23:881–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nikolakis D (2008) A statistical study of precipitation in Cyprus. Hell J Geosci 43:67–74Google Scholar
  37. Novotny EV, Stefan HG (2007) Stream flow in Minnesota: Indicator of climate change. J Hydrol 334:319–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Paltineanu C, Mihailescu I et al (2009) Combining the standardized precipitation index and climatic water deficit in characterizing droughts: a case study in Romania. Theor Appl Climatol 97:219–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Papadaskalopoulou C, Katsou E et al (2015) Review and assessment of the adaptive capacity of the water sector in Cyprus against climate change impacts on water availability. Resour Conserv Recycl 105:95–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pashiardis S, Michaelides S (2008) Implementation of the standardized precipitation index (SPI) and the reconnaissance drought index (RDI) for regional drought assessment: A case study for Cyprus. Eur Water 23/24:57–65Google Scholar
  41. Potop V, Turkott L, Koznarova V, Mozny M (2010) Drought episodes in the Czech Republic and their potential effects in agriculture. Theor Appl Climatol 99:373–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rimkus E, Stonevicius E, Korneev V, Kažys J, Valiuškevicius G, Pakhomau A (2013) Dynamics of meteorological and hydrological droughts in the Neman river basin. Environ Res Lett 8:45014 (10pp)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ryu JH, Sohrabi M, Acharya A (2014) Toward Mapping Gridded Drought Indices to Evaluate Local Drought in a Rapidly Changing Global Environment. Water Resour Manag 28:3859–3869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. SEC 573 (2010) Second Follow-up Report to the Communication on water scarcity and droughts in the European Union COM. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52010DC0228. Accessed 24 Aug 2017
  45. Sen PK (1968) Estimates of the regression coefficients based on Kendall’s tau. J Am Stat Assoc 63:1379–1389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1967) Statistical methods. The Iowa University Press, IowaGoogle Scholar
  47. Sofroniou A, Bishop S (2014) Water Scarcity in Cyprus: A Review and Call for Integrated Policy. Water 6:2898–2928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stewart IT, Cayan DR, Dettinger MD (2005) Changes toward Earlier Streamflow Timing across Western North America. J Clim 18:1136–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Surendran U, Kumar V, Ramasubramoniam S, Raja P (2017) Development of Drought Indices for Semi-Arid Region Using Drought Indices Calculator (DrinC) – A Case Study from Madurai District, a Semi-Arid Region in India. Water Resour Manag 31:3593–3605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tabari H, Nikbakht J, Talae H (2013) Hydrological Drought Assessment in Northwestern Iran Based on Streamflow Drought Index (SDI). Water Resour Manag 27:137–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Theil H (1950) A rank invariant method of linear and polynomial regression analysis, Part 3. Proc K Ned Akad Wet 53:1397–1412Google Scholar
  52. Tigkas D, Vangelis H, Tsakiris G (2012) Drought and climatic change impact on streamflow in small watersheds. Sci Total Environ 440:33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tigkas D, Vangelis H, Tsakiris G (2014) DrinC: a software for drought analysis based on drought indices. Earth Sci Inf 8(3):697–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tsakiris G (2008) Uni-dimensional analysis of droughts for management decisions. Eur Water 23/24:3–11Google Scholar
  55. Tsakiris G, Pangalou D, Vangelis H (2007) Regional drought assessment based on the Reconnaissance drought index (RDI). Water Resour Manag 21(5):821–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Valipour M, Banihabib ME, Behbahani SMR (2013) Comparison of the ARMA, ARIMA, and the autoregressive artificial neural network models in forecasting the monthly inflow of Dez dam reservoir. J Hydrol 476:433–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vasiliades L, Loukas A, Liberis N (2011) A Water Balance Derived Drought Index for Pinios River Basin. Greece. Water Resour Manag 25(4):1087–1101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wang W, Van Gelde PHAJM, Vrijling JK (2005) Trend and stationarity analysis for stareamflow processes of rivers in Western Europe in the 20th century. IWA International Conference on Water Economics, Statistics and Finance. Rethymno, Greece. 8–10 July. pp 451–461Google Scholar
  59. WDD and FAO (2002) Reassessment of the Island's Water Resources and Demand of Cyprus. Ministry of Agriculture. Natural Resources and Environment - WDD – Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). pp 1–31Google Scholar
  60. Wittenberg L, Kutiel H, Greenbaum N, Inbar M (2007) Short-term changes in the magnitude. frequency and temporal distribution of floods in the Eastern Mediterranean region during the last 45 years—Nahal Oren. Mt. Carmel. Israel. Geomorphology 84(3–4):181–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. XlStat (2016) Documentation Guide. p. 1–1433. http://www.xlstat.com/. Accessed 24 Aug 2017
  62. Yarar A (2014) A Hybrid Wavelet and Neuro-Fuzzy Model for Forecasting the Monthly Streamflow Data. Water Resour Manag 28:553–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yue S, Wang C (2004) The Mann-Kendall Test Modified by Effective Sample Size to Detect Trend in Serially Correlated Hydrological Series. Water Resour Manag 18:201–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yue S, Pilon P, Cavadias G (2002) The influence of autocorrelation on the ability to detect trend in hydrological series. Hydrol Process 16(9):1807–1829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhang X, Peng Y, Zhang C, Wang B (2015) Are hybrid models integrated with data preprocessing techniques suitable for monthly streamflow forecasting? Some experiment evidences. J Hydrol 530:137–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhou H-C, Peng Y, Liang H-G (2008) The research of monthly discharge predictor-corrector model based on wavelet decomposition. Water Resour Manag 22:217–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Forestry and Natural EnvironmentAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.Department of Forestry and Natural Environment ManagementEastern Macedonia and Thrace Institute of TechnologyDramaGreece
  3. 3.Hellenic Agricultural Organization ‘Demeter’Institute of Plant Breeding & Phytogenetic ResourcesThessalonikiGreece
  4. 4.Division of Hydrometry, Water Development DepartmentPallouriotissaCyprus

Personalised recommendations