Long-Term Planning of Water Systems in the Context of Climate Non-Stationarity with Deterministic and Stochastic Optimization
- 155 Downloads
Seasonal inflow variability, climate non-stationarity and climate change are matters of concern for water system planning and management. This study presents optimization methods for long-term planning of water systems in the context of a non-stationary climate with two levels of inflow variability: seasonal and inter-annual. Deterministic and stochastic optimization models with either one time-step (intra-annual) or two time-steps (intra-annual and inter-annual) were compared by using three water system optimization models. The first model used one time-step sampling stochastic dynamic programming (SSDP). The other models with two time-steps are long-term deterministic dynamic programming (LT-DDP) and long-term sampling stochastic dynamic programming (LT-SSDP). The study area is the Manicouagan water system located in Quebec, Canada. The results show that there will be an increase of inflow to hydropower plants in the future climate with an increase of inflow uncertainty. The stochastic optimization with two time-steps was the most suitable for handling climate non-stationarity. The LT-DDP performed better in terms of reservoir storage, release and system efficiency but with high uncertainty. The SSDP had the lowest performance. The SSDP was not able to deal with the non-stationary climate and seasonal variability at the same time. The LT-SSDP generated operating policies with smaller uncertainty compared to LT-DDP, and it was therefore a more appropriate approach for water system planning and management in a non-stationary climate characterized by high inflow variability.
KeywordsNon-stationary climate Hydropower Deterministic Stochastic Optimization
The climate model data was provided by the Earth System Grid. The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada’s Collaborative Research and Development program, OURANOS and Hydro-Québec funded this project.
- Batista Celeste A, Suzuki K, Kadota A (2008) Integrating long- and short-term reservoir operation models via stochastic and deterministic optimization: case study in Japan. J Water Resour Plan Manag 134:440–448. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2008)134:5(440) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Côté P, Haguma D, Leconte R, Krau S (2011) Stochastic optimisation of hydro-Quebec hydropower installations: a statistical comparison between SDP and SSDP methods. Can J Civ Eng 38:1427–1434Google Scholar
- Haguma D, Leconte R, Krau S et al (2015) Water resources optimization method in the context of climate change. J Water Resour Plan Manag 141:4014051. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000445 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Karamouz M, Houck MH (1987) Comparison of stochastic and deterministic dynamic programming for reservoir operating rule generation. J Am Water Resour Assoc 23:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1987.tb00778.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Minville M, Brissette F, Leconte R (2010) Impacts and uncertainty of climate change on water resource management of the Peribonka River system (Canada). J Water Resour Plan Manag 136:376–385. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nakićenović N, Davidson O, Davis G et al (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios (SRES), a special report of working group III of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Widmann M, Bretherton CS, Salathé EP (2003) Statistical precipitation downscaling over the northwestern United States using numerically simulated precipitation as a predictor. J Clim 16:799–816. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<0799:SPDOTN>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zambelli M, Siqueira TG, Cicogna M, Soares S (2006) Deterministic versus stochastic models for long term hydrothermal scheduling. In: 2006 I.E. power engineering society general meeting. IEEE, p 7Google Scholar