Water Resources Management

, Volume 32, Issue 5, pp 1725–1739 | Cite as

Long-Term Planning of Water Systems in the Context of Climate Non-Stationarity with Deterministic and Stochastic Optimization

Article
  • 41 Downloads

Abstract

Seasonal inflow variability, climate non-stationarity and climate change are matters of concern for water system planning and management. This study presents optimization methods for long-term planning of water systems in the context of a non-stationary climate with two levels of inflow variability: seasonal and inter-annual. Deterministic and stochastic optimization models with either one time-step (intra-annual) or two time-steps (intra-annual and inter-annual) were compared by using three water system optimization models. The first model used one time-step sampling stochastic dynamic programming (SSDP). The other models with two time-steps are long-term deterministic dynamic programming (LT-DDP) and long-term sampling stochastic dynamic programming (LT-SSDP). The study area is the Manicouagan water system located in Quebec, Canada. The results show that there will be an increase of inflow to hydropower plants in the future climate with an increase of inflow uncertainty. The stochastic optimization with two time-steps was the most suitable for handling climate non-stationarity. The LT-DDP performed better in terms of reservoir storage, release and system efficiency but with high uncertainty. The SSDP had the lowest performance. The SSDP was not able to deal with the non-stationary climate and seasonal variability at the same time. The LT-SSDP generated operating policies with smaller uncertainty compared to LT-DDP, and it was therefore a more appropriate approach for water system planning and management in a non-stationary climate characterized by high inflow variability.

Keywords

Non-stationary climate Hydropower Deterministic Stochastic Optimization 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The climate model data was provided by the Earth System Grid. The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada’s Collaborative Research and Development program, OURANOS and Hydro-Québec funded this project.

References

  1. Batista Celeste A, Suzuki K, Kadota A (2008) Integrating long- and short-term reservoir operation models via stochastic and deterministic optimization: case study in Japan. J Water Resour Plan Manag 134:440–448.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2008)134:5(440) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Côté P, Haguma D, Leconte R, Krau S (2011) Stochastic optimisation of hydro-Quebec hydropower installations: a statistical comparison between SDP and SSDP methods. Can J Civ Eng 38:1427–1434Google Scholar
  3. Faber BA, Stedinger JR (2001) Reservoir optimization using sampling SDP with ensemble streamflow prediction (ESP) forecasts. J Hydrol 249:113–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00419-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fiseha BM, Setegn SG, Melesse AM et al (2014) Impact of climate change on the hydrology of upper Tiber River basin using bias corrected regional climate model. Water Resour Manag 28:1327–1343.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0546-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gaudard L, Gilli M, Romerio F (2013) Climate change impacts on hydropower management. Water Resour Manag 27:5143–5156.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0458-1 Google Scholar
  6. Haguma D, Leconte R, Côté P et al (2014) Optimal hydropower generation under climate change conditions for a northern water resources system. Water Resour Manag 28(13):4631–4644.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0763-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Haguma D, Leconte R, Krau S et al (2015) Water resources optimization method in the context of climate change. J Water Resour Plan Manag 141:4014051.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000445 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hansen J, Sato M, Ruedy R (2012) Perception of climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:E2415–E2423.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205276109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hawkins E, Sutton R (2011) The potential to narrow uncertainty in projections of regional precipitation change. Clim Dyn 37:407–418.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0810-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Karamouz M, Houck MH (1987) Comparison of stochastic and deterministic dynamic programming for reservoir operating rule generation. J Am Water Resour Assoc 23:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1987.tb00778.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kelman J, Stedinger JR, Cooper LA et al (1990) Sampling stochastic dynamic programming applied to reservoir operation. Water Resour Res 26:447–454.  https://doi.org/10.1029/WR026i003p00447 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Milly PCD, Betancourt J, Falkenmark M et al (2008) Stationarity is dead: whither water management? Science 319:573–574.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151915 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Minville M, Brissette F, Leconte R (2010) Impacts and uncertainty of climate change on water resource management of the Peribonka River system (Canada). J Water Resour Plan Manag 136:376–385.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nakićenović N, Davidson O, Davis G et al (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios (SRES), a special report of working group III of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Rahman M, Bolisetti T, Balachandar R (2012) Hydrologic modelling to assess the climate change impacts in a southern Ontario watershed. Can J Civ Eng 39:91–103.  https://doi.org/10.1139/l11-112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Salathé EP (2005) Downscaling simulations of future global climate with application to hydrologic modelling. Int J Climatol 25:419–436.  https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stedinger JR, Sule BF, Loucks DP (1984) Stochastic dynamic programming models for reservoir operation optimization. Water Resour Res 20:1499–1505.  https://doi.org/10.1029/WR020i011p01499 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Vicuna S, Dracup JA, Lund JR et al (2010) Basin-scale water system operations with uncertain future climate conditions: methodology and case studies. Water Resour Res 46:W04505.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR007838 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Widmann M, Bretherton CS, Salathé EP (2003) Statistical precipitation downscaling over the northwestern United States using numerically simulated precipitation as a predictor. J Clim 16:799–816.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<0799:SPDOTN>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zambelli M, Siqueira TG, Cicogna M, Soares S (2006) Deterministic versus stochastic models for long term hydrothermal scheduling. In: 2006 I.E. power engineering society general meeting. IEEE, p 7Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université de SherbrookeQCCanada

Personalised recommendations