Skip to main content
Log in

Automated Framework for Water Looped Network Equilibrium

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a novel algorithm is proposed for balancing water looped network in steady state through a fully automated general framework of hydraulic networks regardless of their topological complexity. The model is developed by combining the following two steps, firstly a set of independent loops are identified based on a graph theoretical analysis in a looped network. Further the second step is devoted to the equilibrium process by determining the flow rate distribution within the network ducts and the pressure in the delivery nodes. The above such equilibrium process gives rise to a system of non linear algebraic equations which are solved numerically using both Hardy Cross (HC) and Newton Raphson (NR) methods. In HC method, the flow correction term is modified and a generalized expression is given to consider various possibilities of independent loops selection. Some real networks topologies that were commonly used as benchmarks, for testing various independent loops selection algorithms, are taken as case studies to apply the general automatic framework for hydraulic network analysis. Such network analysis enhances proving the applicability as well as the effectiveness of the proposed approach. Also, during the equilibrium procedure, it is proved that NR method is capable of producing accurate results and it converges more rapidly comparing to the widely used HC method. Moreover, it is demonstrated that NR’s iterative process, contrary to HC’s one, converges to reliable results even with a choice of random initial flow rates which makes a NR algorithm quite simple to implement without affecting the accuracy of the results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvarruiz F, Martínez-Alzamora F, Vidal AM (2015) Improving the Efficiency of the Loop Method for the Simulation of Water Distribution Systems. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000539

  • Alvisi S, Creaco E, Franchini M (2011) Segment identification in water distribution systems. UrbanWater Journal 8(4):203–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2011.595803

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayad A, Awad H, Yassin A (2013) Developed hydraulic simulation model for water pipeline networks. Alex Eng J 52:43–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellman R (1958) On a routing problem. Q Appl Math 16(1):87–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binder RC (1973) Fluid mechanics. Prentice-Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Bragalli C, D’Ambrosio C, Lee J, Lodi A, Toth P (2008) Water network design by MINLP. Rep. No. RC24495, IBM Research,Yorktown Heights

  • Brkić D (2011) Iterative methods for looped network pipeline calculation. Water Resour Manag 25:2951–2987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9784-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrashekar M, Stewart K (1975) Sparsity oriented analysis of large pipe networks. Journal of the Hydraulics Division 101(4):341–355

  • Creaco E, Franchini M (2014) Comparison of Newton-Raphson Global and Loop Algorithms for Water Distribution Network Resolution. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 140(3):313–321. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000825

  • Creaco E, Franchini M (2015) The identification of loops in water distribution networks. 13th Computer Control for Water Industry Conference CCWI 2015 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.878

  • Cross H (1936) Analysis of flow in network of conduits or conductors Bulletin No. 286, University of Illinois, Engineering Experimental Station, Urbana, II

  • Dijkstra EW (1959) A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numer Math 1:269–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Divénot A (1980) A new mesh network calculation method. La Houille Blanche 6:365–375

  • Dobrnjac M (2012) Determination of Friction Coefficient in Transition Flow Region for Water Works and Pipelines Calculation. Annals of Faculty Engineering Hunedoara, International Journal of Engineering X(3):137–142

  • Fox RW, McDonald AT (1992) Introduction to fluid mechanics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles RV (1962) Theory and Problems of Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulics. Schaum Publishing Co. p274, New York

  • Haihong M, Mao B, Dezhang L, Jean-Claude R (1998) Study of flow and transport in fracture network using percolation theory. Appl Math Model 22:277–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal JB (1956) On the shortest spanning subtree of a graph and the travelling salesman problem. Proc Am Math Soc 7:48–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes AMG (2003) Implementation of the hardy-cross method for the solution of piping networks. Wiley Periodicals Inc 117–125

  • Moosavian N, Jaefarzadeh MR (2014) Hydraulic Analysis of Water Supply Networks using Modified Hardy Cross Method. International Journal of Engineering Transactions C 27(9):1331–1338

  • Prim R (1957) Shortest connection networks and some generalizations. Bell Syst Tech J 36:1389–1401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raad DN (2011) Multi-objective optimisation of water distribution systems design using metaheuristics. Dissertation, University of Stellenbosch

  • Sârbu I (1987) Computational model of hydraulic regime in complex water distribution networks. Hydrotechnics 8:309–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamir U, Howard C (1968) Water distribution system analysis. J Hydraul Div 94:219–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuang Q, Zhang M, Yuan Y (2014) Performance and reliability analysis of water distribution systems under cascading failures and the identification of crucial pipes. PLoS One 9(2):e88445. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiliotis M, Tsakiris G (2011) Water distribution system analysis: Newton-Raphson method revisited. J Hydraul Eng 137:852–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todini E (2000) Looped water distribution networks design using a resilience index based heuristic approach. Urban Water 2:115–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todini E, Rossman, L (2013) Unified Framework for Deriving Simultaneous Equation Algorithms for Water Distribution Networks. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 139(5):511–526. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000703

  • Travers K (1967) The mesh method in gas network analysis. Gas J 332:167–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Walski TM, Chase DV, Savic DA (2001) Water distribution modeling. Haestad Press, Waterbury

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood DJ, Charles COA (1972) Hydraulic network analysis using linear theory. J Hydraul Div 98:1157–1170

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The financial support from the Centre for Science and Technology of the Non-aligned and Other Developing Countries (NAM S&T Centre) is gratefully acknowledged. Also, the authors extend their thanks to Professor E. Creaco for his valuable suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zahreddine Hafsi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hafsi, Z., Elaoud, S., Mishra, M. et al. Automated Framework for Water Looped Network Equilibrium. Water Resour Manage 32, 641–657 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1831-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1831-2

Keywords

Navigation