Advertisement

Water Resources Management

, Volume 31, Issue 15, pp 5043–5059 | Cite as

Optimal Location of Pump as Turbines (PATs) in Water Distribution Networks to Recover Energy and Reduce Leakage

  • Oreste Fecarotta
  • Aonghus McNabola
Article

Abstract

Water distribution networks are high energy and low efficiency systems, where water pressure is frequently reduced by dissipation valves to limit leakage. The dissipation produced by the valves can be converted to energy production to increase the efficiency and reduce the energy impact of networks. If valves are replaced by turbines or pumps as turbines (PATs), they can both reduce pressure and produce energy. This study focuses on the optimal location of PATs within a water distribution network in order to both produce energy and reduce leakage. A new optimization model is developed consisting of several linear and non-linear constraints and a newly proposed objective function, where the turbine installation costs as well as the energy production and the economic saving due to the reduction of leakage can be accounted all together. The case study shows that the application of the mathematical model to a synthetic network ensures better results, in terms of both energy production and water saving, in comparison to other procedures.

Keywords

Energy saving Water Leakage Water losses Pump as Turbines (PATs) Energy production Water distribution networks 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research was developed with the help of the Brief mobility program of Univesity of Naples “Federico II” and was part funded by the ERDF Interreg Ireland-Wales Programme 2014–2020.

Supplementary material

11269_2017_1795_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (148 kb)
(PDF 147 KB)
11269_2017_1795_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (356 kb)
(PDF 355 KB)
11269_2017_1795_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (163 kb)
(PDF 162 KB)

References

  1. Ainger C, Butler D, Caffor I, Crawford-Brown D, Helm D, Stephenson T (2009) A low carbon water industry in 2050. Tech. rep., UK Environment AgencyGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvisi S, Franchini M (2014) A heuristic procedure for the automatic creation of district metered areas in water distribution systems. Urban Water J 11(2):137–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Araujo L (2005) Controlo de perdas na gestao sustenavel dos sistemas de abastecimento de agua. Phd thesis, Universidad Técnica De Lisboa - Instituto Superior TécnicoGoogle Scholar
  4. Araujo L, Ramos H, Coelho S (2006) Pressure control for leakage minimisation in water distribution systems management. Water Resour Manage 20(1):133–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arriaga M (2010) Pump as turbine—a pico-hydro alternative in Lao People’s Democratic Republic. Renew Energ 35:1109–1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belotti P, Kirches C, Leyffer S, Linderoth J, Luedtke J, Mahajan A (2013) Mixed-integer nonlinear optimization. Acta Numer 22:1–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonami P, Biegler LT, Conn AR, Cornuéjols G, Grossmann IE, Laird CD, Lee J, Lodi A, Margot F, Sawaya N et al (2008) An algorithmic framework for convex mixed integer nonlinear programs. Discret Optim 5(2):186–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Byrd RH, Gilbert JC, Nocedal J (2000) A trust region method based on interior point techniques for nonlinear programming. Math Program 89(1):149–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cabrera E, Pardo MA, Cobacho R, Cabrera E J (2010) Energy audit of water networks. J Water Resour Plan Manag 136:669–677.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000077 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carravetta A, Fecarotta O, Ramos H (2011) Numerical simulation on pump as turbine: mesh reliability and performance concerns. In: 3rd international conference on clean electrical power: renewable energy resources impact, ICCEP 2011, Ischia (Italy), 14–16 June 2011, IEEE, pp 169–174Google Scholar
  11. Carravetta A, Fecarotta O, Del Giudice G, Ramos H (2014a) Energy recovery in water systems by pats: a comparisons among the different installation schemes. Procedia Eng 70:275–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carravetta A, Fecarotta O, Martino R, Antipodi L (2014b) PAT efficiency variation with design parameters. Procedia Eng 70:285–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Corcoran L, McNabola A, Coughlan P (2015) Optimization of water distribution networks for combined hydropower energy recovery and leakage reduction. J Water Resour Plan Manag 142(2):04015,045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Marchis M, Milici B, Volpe R, Messineo A (2016) Energy saving in water distribution network through pump as turbine generators: economic and environmental analysis. Energies 9(12):877.  https://doi.org/10.3390/en9110877 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fecarotta O, Aricò C, Carravetta A, Martino R, Ramos HM (2015) Hydropower potential in water distribution networks: Pressure control by pats. Water Resour Manag 29(3):699–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fecarotta O, Carravetta A, Ramos HM, Martino R (2016) An improved affinity model to enhance variable operating strategy for pumps used as turbines. J Hydraul Res 54(3):332–341Google Scholar
  17. Fecarotta O, Ramos HM, Derakhshan S, Del Giudice G, Carravetta A (accepted) Optimal regulation of a pat in water supply systems for energy recovery. J Water Resour Plan Manag - ASCEGoogle Scholar
  18. Fontana N, Giugni M, Portolano D (2012) Losses reduction and energy production in water-distribution networks. J Water Res Pl-ASCE 138(3):237–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fontana N, Giugni M, Glielmo L, Marini G (2016) Real time control of a prototype for pressure regulation and energy production in water distribution networks. J Water Resour Plan Manag 42(7):04016015Google Scholar
  20. Gallagher J, Styles D, McNabola A, Williams AP (2015) Life cycle environmental balance and greenhouse gas mitigation potential of micro-hydropower energy recovery in the water industry. J Clean Prod 99:152–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Giugni M, Fontana N, Ranucci A (2014) Optimal Location of PRVs and Turbines in Water Distribution Systems. J Water Resour Plan Manag 140(9):06014,004.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000418 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greyvenstein B, van Zyl JE (2007) An experimental investigation into the pressure—leakage relationship of some failed water pipes. J Water Supply Res Technol AQUA 56(2):117–124.  https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2007.065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jowitt PW, Xu C (1990) Optimal valve control in water distribution networks. J Water Resour Plan Manag 116(4):455–472.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1990)116:4(455) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Karadirek I, Kara S, Yilmaz G, Muhammetoglu A, Muhammetoglu H (2012) Implementation of hydraulic modelling for water-loss reduction through pressure management. Water Resour Manage 26(9):2555–2568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McNabola A, Coughlan P, Corcoran L, Power C, Williams AP, Harris I, Gallagher J, Styles D (2014a) Energy recovery in the water industry using micro-hydropower: an opportunity to improve sustainability. Water Policy 16(1):168–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McNabola A, Coughlan P, Williams A (2014b) Energy recovery in the water industry: an assessment of the potential of micro-hydropower. Water Environ J 28(2):294–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Olsson G (2012) Water and energy threats and opportunities, 2nd edn. IWA Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Pugliese F, De Paola F, Fontana N, Giugni M, Marini G (2016) Experimental characterization of two pumps as turbines for hydropower generation. Renew Energy 99:180–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ramos H, Covas D, Araujo L, Mello M (2005) Available energy assessment in water supply systems. In: XXXI IAHR Congress, SeoulGoogle Scholar
  30. Ramos HM, Borga A, Simão M (2009) New design solutions for low-power energy production in water pipe systems. Water Sci Eng 2(4):69–84Google Scholar
  31. Ramos H, Mello M, De P (2010) Clean power in water supply systems as a sustainable solution: from planning to practical implementation. Water Sci Technol 10(1):39–49Google Scholar
  32. Samora I, Franca MJ, Schleiss AJ, Ramos HM (2016) Simulated annealing in optimization of energy production in a water supply network. Water Resour Manag 30(4):1533–1547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schoenemann T (2010) Computing optimal alignments for the ibm-3 translation model. In: Proceedings of the fourteenth conference on computational natural language learning. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 98–106Google Scholar
  34. Sterling M, Bargiela A (1984) Leakage reduction by optimised control of valves in water networks. Trans Inst Meas Control 6(6):293–298.  https://doi.org/10.1177/014233128400600603 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wächter A, Biegler LT (2006) On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming. Math Program 106(1):25–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zilberman D, Sproul T, Rajagopal D, Sexton S, Hellegers P (2008) Rising energy prices and the economics of water in agriculture. Water Policy 10(S1):11–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of Naples “Federico II”NaplesItaly
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringTrinity College of DublinDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations