Water Resources Management

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 1191–1207 | Cite as

Modelling Equitable and Reasonable Water Sharing in Transboundary Rivers: the Case of Sirwan-Diyala River

Article

Abstract

There are over 260 transboundary river and lake basins in the world that many of them are facing great challenges of water sharing between riparian countries concerned. The 1997 UN Watercourses Convention, entered into force in 2014, includes articles and factors on water sharing which have not been completely used for modelling of the basins yet. In this paper, legal aspects (i.e. Articles 5, 6, 7 and 10 of the Convention) are integrated with a technical approach for water allocation in transboundary rivers. For this purpose, a new conceptual model is developed for quantification of the Convention provisions concerning equitable and reasonable water sharing. The method is applied to the Sirwan-Diyala transboundary river shared by Iran and Iraq. Some indicators are developed and quantified for determination of water shares of the riparian countries and different scenarios considering extreme and equal weights of the factors are defined. The basin is simulated by WEAP model to evaluate effects of the scenarios on up- and downstream of the basin. Five demand management alternatives comprising increasing of irrigation efficiency and eliminating second cultivation are proposed as appropriate measures for elimination or mitigation of possible significant harm. The proposed technical-legal approach paves the way for enhancing bargaining potentials of the riparian countries and increasing their cooperation to achieve a win-win solution in using waters of transboundary rivers.

Keywords

Transboundary rivers The UN watercourse convention Equitable and reasonable use Water allocation WEAP model The Sirwan-Diyala River 

References

  1. Arjoon D, Tilmant A, Herrmann M (2016) Sharing water and benefits in transboundary river basins. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 20(6):2135–2150. doi: 10.5194/hess-20-2135-2016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beaumont P (2000) The 1997 UN convention on the law of non-navigational uses of international watercourses: its strengths and weaknesses from a water management perspective and the need for new workable guidelines. International Journal of Water Resources Development 16(4):475–495. doi: 10.1080/713672536 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Daoudy M (2007) Benefit-sharing as a tool of conflict transformation: applying the inter-SEDE model to the Euphrates and Tigris river basins. Economics of Peace and Security Journal 2(2):26–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Devi S, Srivastava D, Mahan C (2005) Optimal water allocation for the transboundary Subernarekha River, India. J Water Resour Plan Manag 131(4):253–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eskander SM, Janus T, Barbier E (2016) Linking the unlinked: transboundary water-sharing under water-for-leverage negotiations. Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Annual Meeting, Boston, Massachusetts, July 31–August 2Google Scholar
  6. Fisher FM, Arlosoroff S, Eckstein Z, Haddadin M, Hamati SG, Huber-Lee A, Jarrar A, Jayyousi A, Shamir U, Wesseling H (2002) Optimal water management and conflict resolution: the Middle East water project. Water Resour Res 38(11):25–1–25-17. doi: 10.1029/2001WR000943
  7. Gleick PH, Yolles P, Hatami H (1994) Water, war, and peace in the Middle East. Environment 36(3):6–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hu Z, Wei C, Yao L, Li C, Zeng Z (2016) Integrating equality stability to resolve water allocation issues with a multiobjective bilevel programming model. J Water Resour Plan Manag. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000640 Google Scholar
  9. International Law Commission (1994) Forty-sixth session on draft articles on the law of the non-navigational uses of international watercourses. UN Doc A/49/10Google Scholar
  10. Kampragou E, Eleftheriadou E, Mylopoulos Y (2007) Implementing equitable water allocation in transboundary basins: the case of river Nestos/Mesta. Water Resour Manag 21(5):909–918. doi: 10.1007/s11269-006-9108-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kritskiy SN, Menkel MF (1952) Water management computation (in Russian). Gidrometizd, Moscow, Leningrad, p 392Google Scholar
  12. Kucukmehmetoglu M, Guldmann JM (2004) International water resources allocation and conflicts: the case of the Euphrates and the Tigris. Environ and Plan A 36:783–801. doi: 10.1068/a3670 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kundzewicz ZW, Kindler J (1995) Multiple criteria for evaluation of reliability aspects of water resources systems. Modelling and Management of Sustainable Basin-scale Water Resources Systems, IAHS Publ 231:217–224Google Scholar
  14. Li B, Tan G, Chen G (2016) Generalized uncooperative planar game theory model for water distribution in transboundary rivers. Water Resour Manag 30(9):225–241. doi: 10.1007/s11269-015-1158-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mahan RC, Horbulyk TM, Rowse JG (2002) Market mechanisms and the efficient allocation of surface water resources in southern Alberta. Socio Econ Plan Sci 36(1):25–49. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0121(01)00013-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McCaffrey SC (2008) Convention on the law of the non-navigational uses of international watercourses. United Nations. http://legal.un.org/avl/pdf/ha/clnuiw/clnuiw_e.pdf. Accessed 20 Jun 2016
  17. Mehrparvar M, Ahmadi A, Safavi HR (2016) Social resolution of conflicts over water resources allocation in a river basin using cooperative game theory approaches: a case study. Intl J River Basin Management 14(1):33–45. doi: 10.1080/15715124.2015.1081209 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mimi ZA, Sawalhi BI (2003) A decision tool for allocating the waters of the Jordan River basin between all riparian parties. Water Resour Manag 17(6):447–461. doi: 10.1023/B:WARM.0000004959.90022.ba
  19. Rieu-Clarke A, Moynihan R, Magsig B (2012) UN Watercourses Convention–User’s Guide (CWLPS) http://www.gwp.org/Global/OurApproach/StrategicAllies/User'sGuidetotheUNWatercoursesConvention(2012).pdf. Accessed 20 June 2016
  20. Rogers P (1969) A game theory approach to the problems of international river basins. Water Resour Res 5(4):749–760. doi: 10.1029/WR005i004p00749 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Roozbahani R, Abbasi B, Schreider S, Ardakani A (2014) A multi-objective approach for transboundary river water allocation. Water Resour Manag 28(15):5447–5463. doi: 10.1007/s11269-014-0812-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Roozbahani R, Schreider S, Abbasi B (2015) Optimal water allocation through a multi-objective compromise between environmental, social, and economic preferences. Environ Model Softw 64:18–30. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Salman SMA (2006) International water disputes: a new breed of claims, claimants and settlement institutions. Water Int 31(1):2–11. doi: 10.1080/02508060608691909 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Salman SMA (2010) Downstream riparians can also harm upstream riparians: the concept of foreclosure of future uses. Water Int 35(4):350–364. doi: 10.1080/02508060.2010.508160 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shuval H (1992) Approaches to resolving the water conflicts between Israel and her neighbors: a regional waterforpeace plan. Water Int 17(3):133–143. doi: 10.1080/02508069208686133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. SIWI (2012) Paper 20: Options for cooperative action in the euphrates and tigris region. http://www.siwi.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Paper_20-Euphrates_and_Tigris_Region_webb. Accessed 20 June 2016
  27. Teasley RL, McKinney DC (2011) Calculating the benefits of transboundary river basin cooperation: Syr Darya basin. J Water Resour Plan Manag 137(6):481–490. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000141 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. van der Zaag P, Seyam IM, Savenije HG (2002) Towards measurable criteria for the equitable sharing of international water resources. Water Policy 4:19–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wolf AT (1999) Criteria for equitable allocations: the heart of international water conflict. Nat Res Forum 23(1):3–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-8947.1999.tb00235.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil, Water and Environmental EngineeringShahid Beheshti UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations