Government–nonprofit relations in China have transformed over the past three decades. Building on policy instrument theory, this article explores which policy instruments have been used to steer nonprofits at the central level and how the use of policy instruments has changed over time. This article is based on a content analysis of 300 central-level policy documents for nonprofits using NVivo. The results show that 22 kinds of policy instruments have been used to steer nonprofits. A steep upward trend is evident in the use of four categories of policy instruments for nonprofits: authority, incentive, information, and organization. Policy instruments for nonprofits have advanced in diversity, emphasizing indirect control. The central government continues to show a significant predisposition toward regulatory instruments, which have evolved from ex ante regulation to process and ex post regulation. This article contributes to the public management literature by identifying which policy instruments governments use to shape government–nonprofit relations.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
According to laws and regulations in China, nonprofit organizations include three major types: social groups, social service organizations (private non-enterprise entities), and foundations. The three types of nonprofit organizations cover a great diversity of entities. This study views nonprofit organizations in China as a single “sector” and does not distinguish these organizations.
In this study, the central government refers to the organs of the CCP Central Committee, the NPC, the State Council and its ministries, the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Procuratorate in China, not only the State Council in the narrow sense.
Anheier, H. K. (2005). Nonprofit organizations: Theory, management, policy. New York, NY: Routledge.
Bemelmans-Videc, M. L., Rist, C. R., & Vedung, O. E. (1998). Carrots, sticks, and sermons: Policy instruments and their evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Bies, A., & Kennedy, S. (2019). The state and the state of the art on philanthropy in China. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30(4), 619–633.
Burns, P. J. (1999). The People’s Republic of China at 50: National political reform. The China Quarterly, 159, 580–594.
Burns, P. J. (2001). Public sector reform and the state: The case of China. Public Administration Quarterly, 24(4), 419–436.
Chan, C. P., & Drewry, G. (2001). The 1998 State Council organizational streamlining: Personnel reduction and change of government function. Journal of Contemporary China, 10(29), 553–572.
Cooper, M. C. (2006). ‘This is our way in’: The civil society of environmental NGOs in South-West China. Government & Opposition, 41(1), 109–136.
Feiock, R. C., Jeong, M., & Kim, J. (2003). Credible commitment and council-manager government: Implications for policy instrument choices. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 616–625.
Feiock, R. C., Tavares, A. F., & Lubell, M. (2008). Policy instrument choices for growth management and land use regulation. Policy Studies Journal, 36(3), 461–480.
Fulda, A., Li, Y., & Song, Q. (2012). New strategies of civil society in China: A case study of the network governance approach. Journal of Contemporary China, 21(76), 675–693.
Gao, H., & Tyson, A. (2017). Administrative reform and the transfer of authority to social organizations in China. The China Quarterly, 232, 1050–1069.
Ho, P. (2001). Greening without conflict? Environmentalism, NGOs and civil society in China. Development and Change, 32(5), 893–921.
Hood, C. C. (1983). The tools of government. London: The Macmillan Press.
Howlett, M. (2011). Designing public policies: Principles and instruments. New York, NY: Routledge.
Hsu, J. Y. J., & Hasmath, R. (2014). The local corporatist state and NGO relations in China. Journal of Contemporary China, 23(87), 516–534.
Hsu, J. Y. J., Hsu, C. L., & Hasmath, R. (2017). NGO strategies in an authoritarian context, and their implications for citizenship: The case of the People’s Republic of China. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(3), 1157–1179.
Huang, Y. (2018). At the mercy of the state: Health philanthropy in China. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30(4), 634–646.
Hutchison, A. J., Johnston, L. H., & Breckon, J. D. (2010). Using QSR-NVivo to facilitate the development of a grounded theory project: An account of a worked example. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(4), 283–302.
Jing, Y. (2015). Between control and empowerment: Governmental strategies towards the development of the non-profit sector in China. Asian Studies Review, 39(4), 589–608.
Jing, Y., & Gong, T. (2012). Managed social innovation: The case of government-sponsored venture philanthropy in Shanghai. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 71(2), 233–245.
Jing, Y., & Hu, Y. (2017). From service contracting to collaborative governance: Evolution of government-nonprofit relations. Public Administration and Development, 37(3), 191–202.
Jordan, A., Wurzel, R. K. W., & Zito, A. (2005). The rise of “new” policy instruments in comparative perspective: Has governance eclipsed government? Political Studies, 53(3), 477–496.
Kang, X., & Han, H. (2008). Graduated controls: The state-society relationship in contemporary China. Modern China, 34(1), 36–55.
Kwong, J. (2004). Educating migrant children: Negotiations between the state and civil society. The China Quarterly, 180, 1073–1088.
Lan, Z. (1999). The 1998 administrative reform in China: Issues, challenges and prospects. Asian Journal of Public Administration, 21(1), 29–54.
Li, H., Lo, C. W. H., & Tang, S. Y. (2017). Nonprofit policy advocacy under authoritarianism. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 103–117.
Li, Y. (2013). Disability service organizations and their relationship with the Chinese government: A case study in Beijing. The China Review, 13(2), 67–96.
Lowi, T. J. (1972). Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review, 32(4), 298–310.
McDonnell, L. M., & Elmore, R. F. (1987). Getting the job done: Alternative policy instruments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), 133–152.
Ministry of Civil Affairs, PRC. (2017). Statistical communiqué on the 2017 social service and development. Retrieved January 12, 2019, from https://www.mca.gov.cn/article/sj/tjgb/.
Perry, J. E. (1994). Trends in the study of Chinese politics: State-society relations. The China Quarterly, 139, 704–713.
Saich, T. (2000). Negotiating the state: The development of social organizations in China. The China Quarterly, 161, 124–141.
Salamon, M. L. (1987). Of market failure, voluntary failure, and third-party government: Toward a theory of government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 16(1–2), 29–49.
Salamon, M. L. (1995). Partners in public services: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore, MD: JHU Press.
Salamon, M. L. (2002). The tools of government: A guide to the new governance. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1990). Behavioral assumptions of policy tools. The Journal of Politics, 52(2), 510–529.
Shieh, S., & Deng, G. (2011). An emerging civil society: The impact of the 2008 Sichuan Earthquake on grass-roots associations in China. The China Journal, 65, 181–194.
Shieh, S. (2013). Chinese NGO directory: 251 NGO profiles and special report: China’s Civil Society in the making. Beijing: China Development Brief.
Simon, W. K. (2013). Civil Society in China: The legal framework from ancient times to the “New Reform Era”. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
Spires, J. A. (2011). Contingent symbiosis and civil society in an authoritarian state: Understanding the survival of China’s grassroots NGOs. American Journal of Sociology, 117(1), 1–45.
State Council. (2013). The scheme for public sector reform and function change of the State Council. Retrieved January 12, 2019, from https://www.china.com.cn/news/2013lianghui/2013-03/14/content_28245220_3.htm.
Tang, S. Y., & Zhan, X. (2008). Civic environmental NGOs, civil society, and democratization in China. The Journal of Development Studies, 44(3), 425–448.
Thornton, M. P. (2013). The advance of the Party: Transformation or takeover of urban grassroots society? The China Quarterly, 213, 1–18.
Wei, Q. (2017). From direct involvement to indirect control? A multilevel analysis of factors influencing Chinese foundations’ capacity for resource mobilization. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9924-3.
Xiao, M., & Lin, H. (2016). Carrots and sticks: A case study of government-caused Danwei tradition in Chinese NGOs. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(5), 2027–2036.
Yu, J., & Zhou, J. (2013). Local governance and business associations in Wenzhou: A model for the road to civil society in China? Journal of Contemporary China, 22(81), 394–408.
Zhan, X., & Tang, S. Y. (2013). Political opportunities, resource constraints and policy advocacy of environmental NGOs in China. Public Administration, 91(2), 381–399.
Zhang, Y. (2015). Dependent interdependence: The complicated dance of government-nonprofit relations in China. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(6), 2395–2423.
The Zejin Liu received a scholarship from the charity fund of the Zhangjiajie Genting Cultural Industry Development Co. to pursue doctoral studies.
Conflict of interest
The first author and second author declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, Z., Van de Walle, S. Understanding Policy Instruments for Steering Nonprofit Organizations in China: Only Carrots and Sticks?. Voluntas 31, 736–750 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00231-8
- Policy instruments
- Government–nonprofit relations