Advertisement

Charity, Volunteering Type and Subjective Wellbeing

  • Samuelson Appau
  • Sefa Awaworyi Churchill
Original Paper

Abstract

We examine the impact of volunteering and charitable donations on subjective wellbeing. We further consider if the model of the volunteering work (formal vs. informal) and the geographical location of the charity organisation (local vs. international) people donate to has any impact on subjective wellbeing. Using UK’s Community Life Survey data, we find that volunteering and engagement in charity are positively associated with subjective wellbeing, measured by individual life satisfaction. We show that while there is a positive effect of volunteering and charity on life satisfaction, the level of utility gained depends on the type of charity or volunteering organisation engaged with (i.e. local or international). Specifically, donating to local (neighbourhood) charities as opposed to international/national charities is associated with higher wellbeing. Similarly, engaging in informal volunteering, compared to formal volunteering, is associated with higher wellbeing. To explain our results, we use the construal-level theory of psychological distance, which suggests that people think more concretely of actions and objects that they find spatially and socially close.

Keywords

Charity Volunteer Wellbeing Life satisfaction Psychological distance 

JEL Classification

I31 

References

  1. Andreoni, J. (1988). Privately provided public goods in a large economy: The limits of altruism. Journal of Public Economics, 35(1), 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreoni, J. (1989). Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian Equivalence. Journal of Political Economy, 97(6), 1447–1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. The Economic Journal, 100(401), 464–477.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2234133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Awaworyi Churchill, S., & Mishra, V. (2017). Trust, social networks and subjective wellbeing in China. Social Indicators Research, 132(1), 313–339.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1220-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Awaworyi Churchill, S., Ocloo, J. E., & Siawor-Robertson, D. (2016). Ethnic diversity and health outcomes. Social Indicators Research.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1454-7.Google Scholar
  6. Awaworyi Churchill, S., & Smyth, R. (2017). Ethnic diversity and poverty. World Development, 95, 285–302.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.02.032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2011). A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5), 924–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Belfield, C. R., & Kelly, I. R. (2012). The benefits of breast feeding across the early years of childhood. Journal of Human Capital, 6(3), 251–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bornemann, T., & Homburg, C. (2011). Psychological distance and the dual role of price. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(3), 490–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buch, C. M., Kesternich, I., Lipponer, A., & Schnitzer, M. (2014). Financial constraints and foreign direct investment: Firm-level evidence. Review of World Economics, 150(2), 393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cabinet Office. (2013). Community Life Survey, 20122013. UK Data Service. SN: 7405, https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-7405-1.
  12. Cabinet Office. (2014). Community Life Survey, 20132014. UK Data Service. SN: 7560, https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-7560-1.
  13. Cabinet Office. (2015). Community Life Survey, 20142015. UK Data Service. SN: 7836, https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-7836-1.
  14. Chen, H. S., Mitchell, R. K., Brigham, K. H., Howell, R., & Steinbauer, R. (2018). Perceived psychological distance, construal processes, and abstractness of entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(3), 296–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cheng, Z., & Smyth, R. (2015). Sex and happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 112, 26–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Choi, N. G., & Kim, J. (2011). The effect of time volunteering and charitable donations in later life on psychological wellbeing. Ageing and Society, 31(04), 590–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dhar, R., & Kim, E. Y. (2007). Seeing the forest or the trees: Implications of construal level theory for consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 96–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2000). Money and happiness: Income and subjective well-being across nations. In E. D. E. M. Suh (Ed.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 185–218). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., Schroeder, D. A., & Penner, L. A. (2017). The social psychology of prosocial behavior. UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  20. Drollinger, T. (2018). Using active empathetic listening to build relationships with major-gift donors. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 30(1), 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 27(1), 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Emran, M. S., & Shilpi, F. (2012). The extent of the market and stages of agricultural specialization. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique, 45(3), 1125–1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Finkelstein, M. A., & Brannick, M. T. (2007). Applying theories of institutional helping to informal volunteering: Motives, role identity, and prosocial personality. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 35(1), 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Glazer, A., & Konrad, K. A. (1996). A signaling explanation for charity. The American Economic Review, 86(4), 1019–1028.Google Scholar
  25. Handy, F., Cnaan, R. A., Brudney, J. L., Ascoli, U., Meijs, L. C., & Ranade, S. (2000). Public perception of “who is a volunteer”: An examination of the net-cost approach from a cross-cultural perspective. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 11(1), 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim, H., & John, D. R. (2008). Consumer response to brand extensions: Construal level as a moderator of the importance of perceived fit. Journal of consumer psychology, 18(2), 116–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lane, T. (2017). How does happiness relate to economic behaviour? A review of the literature. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 68, 62–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ledgerwood, A., Trope, Y., & Chaiken, S. (2010). Flexibility now, consistency later: Psychological distance and construal shape evaluative responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 32–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee, Y. J., & Brudney, J. L. (2012). Participation in formal and informal volunteering: Implications for volunteer recruitment. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 23(2), 159–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lewbel, A. (2012). Using heteroscedasticity to identify and estimate mismeasured and endogenous regressor models. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 30(1), 67–80.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2012.643126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liberman, N., & Förster, J. (2009). Distancing from experienced self: How global-versus-local perception affects estimation of psychological distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(2), 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal level theory and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 113–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McMunn, A., Nazroo, J., Wahrendorf, M., Breeze, E., & Zaninotto, P. (2009). Participation in socially-productive activities, reciprocity and wellbeing in later life: Baseline results in England. Ageing and Society, 29(05), 765–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mishra, V., & Smyth, R. (2015). Estimating returns to schooling in urban China using conventional and heteroskedasticity-based instruments. Economic Modelling, 47, 166–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mitani, H. (2014). Influences of resources and subjective dispositions on formal and informal volunteering. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(4), 1022–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moro, H. (1998). Ambivalent messages: Organizational purposes of NGOs and images of the South. Development in Practice, 8(1), 74–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Morrow-Howell, N., Hinterlong, J., Rozario, P. A., & Tang, F. (2003). Effects of volunteering on the well-being of older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58(3), S137–S145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pinquart, M., & Sörensen, S. (2000). Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 15(2), 187–224.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.15.2.187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Plagnol, A. C., & Huppert, F. A. (2010). Happy to help? Exploring the factors associated with variations in rates of volunteering across Europe. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pope, J. A., Isely, E. S., & Asamoa-Tutu, F. (2009). Developing a marketing strategy for nonprofit organizations: An exploratory study. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 21(2), 184–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Portela, M., Neira, I., & Salinas-Jiménez, M. (2013). Social capital and subjective wellbeing in Europe: A new approach on social capital. Social Indicators Research, 114(2), 493–511.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0158-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rose-Ackerman, S. (1996). Altruism, nonprofits, and economic theory. Journal of Economic Literature, 34(2), 701–728.Google Scholar
  43. Spence, A., Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2012). The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis, 32(6), 957–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stebbins, R. A. (1996). Volunteering: A serious leisure perspective. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25(2), 211–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Strahilevitz, M., & Myers, J. G. (1998). Donations to charity as purchase incentives: How well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 434–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sundeen, R. A., Raskoff, S. A., & Garcia, M. C. (2007). Differences in perceived barriers to volunteering to formal organizations: Lack of time versus lack of interest. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 17(3), 279–300.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thoits, P. A., & Hewitt, L. N. (2001). Volunteer work and well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42(2), 115–131.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3090173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Van Tienen, M., Scheepers, P., Reitsma, J., & Schilderman, H. (2011). The role of religiosity for formal and informal volunteering in the Netherlands. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22(3), 365–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang, L., Mook, L., & Handy, F. (2017). An empirical examination of formal and informal volunteering in Canada. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(1), 139–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wilson, J. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 215–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society for Third-Sector Research and The Johns Hopkins University 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics, Finance and MarketingRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations