Investigating detection success: lessons from trials using decoy rare plants
- 45 Downloads
Imperfect detection leads to underestimates of species presence and decreases the reliability of survey data. Imperfect detection has not been examined in detail for boreal forest understory plants, despite widespread use of surveys for rare plants prior to development. We addressed this issue using detectability trials conducted in Alberta, Canada with decoy vascular plants. Volunteer observers searched in survey plots for species while unaware of their true presence or abundance. Our findings indicate that the detection of cryptic species is very low when abundance is low (0–35%) and plot size is large (< 50% in ≥ 100 m2). Plant density (individuals per unit area) was the most important determinant of detection probability, where more abundant species were detected more often and with less survey effort. When abundance was held constant, diffusely arranged species were twice as likely to be detected compared to those in clumps. Detection of cryptic species can be low even when individuals are flowering, and even morphologically distinct species can go unnoticed in small plots. We suggest that future decoy trials investigate search strategies that could improve detection and that field surveys for vascular plants address imperfect detection through careful consideration of plot size, characteristics of the target species, and survey effort, both in terms of time expenditure within an area and the number of observers employed.
KeywordsDetection trial Detectability Understory vascular plant Rare plant Plant survey Plant monitoring
Ethics approval was granted for both trials through the University of Alberta Research Ethics Office (PRO00059103 in 2015 and PRO00064852 in 2016). All Allium cernuum plants were generously donated in 2016 by the University of Alberta Botanic Garden. This project was supported by funding from the Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute, Alberta Environmental Monitoring and Science Division, and the Alberta Conservation Association. We are grateful for the time and expertise contributed by our 29 volunteer observers.
- Alberta Native Plant Council (2012) Alberta Native Plant Council (ANPC) guidelines for rare vascular plant surveys in Alberta 2012 updateGoogle Scholar
- Alexander HM, Slade NA, Kettle WD, Pittman GL, Reed AW (2009) Detection, survival rates and dynamics of a cryptic plant, Asclepias meadii: applications of mark-recapture models to long-term monitoring studies. J Ecol 97:267–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01468.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Archaux F, Camaret S, Dupouey JL, Ulrich E, Corcket E, Bourjot L, Brethes A, Chevalier R, Dobremez JF, Dumas Y, Dume G, Foret M, Forgeard F, Gallet ML, Picard JF, Richard F, Savoie JM, Seytre L, Timbal J, Touffet J (2009) Can we reliably estimate species richness with large plots? An assessment through calibration training. Plant Ecol 203:303–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-008-9551-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bischof R, Hameed S, Ali H, Kabir M, Younas M, Shah KA, Din JU, Nawaz MA (2014) Using time-to-event analysis to complement hierarchical methods when assessing determinants of photographic detectability during camera trapping. Methods Ecol Evol 5:44–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cox DR, Oakes D (1984) Analysis of survival data. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Griffith B, Youtie B (1988) Two devices for estimating foliage. Wildl Soc Bull 16:206–210Google Scholar
- Henke SE (1998) The effect of multiple search items and item abundance on the efficiency of human searchers. Soc Study Amphib Reptil 32:112–115Google Scholar
- MacKenzie D, Nichols J, Royle J, Pollock KH, Bailey L, Hines JE (2005) Occupancy estimation and modeling: inferring patterns and dynamics of species occurrence, 1st edn. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Therneau TM (2015a) A package for survival analysis in SGoogle Scholar
- Therneau TM (2015b) coxme: mixed effects cox models. Mayo Clinic, RochesterGoogle Scholar