Effects of soil types and bacteria inoculum on the cultivation and reintroduction success of rare plant species
The interaction between plants, soils, and microbes has not received much attention in reintroduction efforts so far, although it is widely known that edaphic conditions play an essential role in local plant distribution. To analyze in how far adaption to natural soil conditions and the use of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) influence reintroduction success, five rare plant species from three habitat types in north-west Germany were exposed to three different soil types, with or without the application of PGPR inoculum. Plant seeds were germinated in a greenhouse and seedlings were transplanted to natural field habitats. Growth and survival was monitored for 2 years. Natural soil from the field yielded the best results for four out of five species, indicating that the “home soil advantage” might have great potential value in the cultivation and reintroduction of rare plants. Commercial potting soil resulted in good to intermediate growth in forest and riverside species, but was the least successful option for the heathland species. Overall, plant grew least on an artificially mixed substrate, mimicking physicochemical soil properties from the natural soil, probably due to incomplete soil forming processes. The application of PGPR had no effect on germination rate and on plant growth in the field, and no consistent effect during cultivation. Based on these results, the use of a generalist PGPR inoculum does not provide a significant benefit to reintroduction efforts. In contrast, the use of home soil might have a great potential to boost reintroduction success.
KeywordsPlant growth-promoting rhizobacteria PGPR Home soil Physicochemical soil properties Plant adaptation Cultivation
The authors thank Merle Büsing, Isgard Lemke, Angela Pannek, and Andreas Suchopar for their help in the field and the greenhouse. We appreciate the support from the Bactiva GmbH and the Stephan Schmidt Gruppe who provided soil bacteria and substrate components free of charge. We thank the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Carrillo-Garcia Á, Bashan Y, Rivera ED, Bethlenfalvay GJ (2000) Effects of resource-island soils, competition, and inoculation with Azospirillum on survival and growth of Pachycereus pringlei, the Giant Cactus of the Sonoran Desert. Restor Ecol 8:65–73. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100x.2000.80009.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dalrymple SE, Banks E, Stewart GB, Pullin AS (2012) A meta-analysis of threatened plant reintroductions from across the globe. In: Maschinski J, Haskins KE, Raven PH (eds) Plant reintroduction in a changing climate: promises and perils. Island Press/Center for Resource Economics, Washington, pp 31–50. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-183-2_3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Guerrant EO (2012) Characterizing two decades of rare plant reintroductions. In: Maschinski J, Haskins KE, Raven PH (eds) Plant reintroduction in a changing climate: promises and perils. Island Press/Center for Resource Economics, Washington, pp 9–29. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-183-2_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Haselwandter K (1997) Soil micro-organisms, mycorrhiza and restoration ecology. In: Urbanska KM, Webb NR, Edwards PJ (eds) Restoration ecology and sustainable development. University Press, Cambridge, pp 65–80Google Scholar
- Haskins KE, Pence V (2012) Transitioning plants to new environments: beneficial applications of soil microbes. In: Maschinski J, Haskins KE, Raven PH (eds) Plant Reintroduction in a Changing Climate. The Science and Practice of Ecological Restoration. Island Press/Center for Resource Economics, Washington, pp 89–107. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-183-2_6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- https://www.nature.com/articles/nplants2016107#supplementary-information. Accessed 26 April 2017
- Koske R, Gemma J (1995) Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation of Hawaiian plants: a conservation technique for endangered tropical species. Pacific Science 49:181–195Google Scholar
- Pearman D, Walker K (2004) Rare plant introductions in the UK: creative conservation or wildflower gardening? Br Wildlife 15:174–182Google Scholar
- Pronk GJ, Heister K, Ding G-C, Smalla K, Kögel-Knabner I (2012) Development of biogeochemical interfaces in an artificial soil incubation experiment; aggregation and formation of organo-mineral associations. Geoderma 189–190:585–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.05.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Quan M, Liang J (2017) The influences of four types of soil on the growth, physiological and biochemical characteristics of Lycoris aurea (L’ Her.). Herb Sci Rep 7:43284 https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43284, https://www.nature.com/articles/srep43284#supplementary-information
- R Developmental Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
- Smith SE, Read DJ (1997) Mycorrhizal symbiosis, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
- Sylvia DM (1989) Nursery inoculation of sea oats with vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and outplanting performance on Florida beaches. J Coastal Res 5:747–754Google Scholar