Plant Ecology

, Volume 218, Issue 4, pp 475–486 | Cite as

The role of salinity tolerance and competition in the distribution of an endangered desert salt marsh endemic

  • Lesley A. DeFalco
  • Sara J. Scoles-Sciulla
  • Emily R. Beamguard
Article
  • 206 Downloads

Abstract

Rare plants are often associated with distinctive soil types, and understanding why endemic species occur in unique environments is fundamental for their management. At Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge in southern Nevada, USA, we evaluated whether the limited distribution of endangered Amargosa niterwort (Nitrophila mohavensis) is explained by this species’ tolerance of saline soils on salt-encrusted mud flats compared with the broadly distributed desert saltgrass (Distichlis spicata var. stricta). We simultaneously explored whether niterwort distribution is restricted from expanding due to interspecific competition with saltgrass. Surface soils collected throughout niterwort’s range were unexpectedly less saline with lower extractable Na, seasonal electroconductivity, and Na absorption ratio, and higher soil moisture than in adjacent saltgrass or mixed shrub habitats. Comparison of niterwort and saltgrass growth along an experimental salinity gradient in a greenhouse demonstrated lower growth of niterwort at all but the highest NaCl concentrations. Although growth of niterwort ramets was similar when transplanted into both habitats at the refuge below Crystal Reservoir, niterwort reproductive effort was considerably higher in saltgrass compared to its own habitat, implying reallocation of resources to sexual reproduction to maximize fitness when the probability of ramet mortality increases with greater salinity stress. Saltgrass was not a demonstrated direct competitor of niterwort; however, this species is known to increase soil salinity by exuding salt ions and through litterfall. Niterwort conservation will benefit from protecting hydrological processes that reduce salinity stress and preventing saltgrass colonization into niterwort habitat.

Keywords

Amargosa niterwort Distichlis spicata var. stricta Nitrophila mohavensis Mojave desert Saltgrass 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the USGS staff and Student Conservation Association interns for assistance with all aspects of field, greenhouse, and laboratory work. R. Laczniak provided the Ash Meadows evaporation unit classification and R. Inman created a working model of niterwort habitat. E. Hewitt and R. Reitz at the College of Southern Nevada, Department of Horticulture generously provided greenhouse space and support. We thank S. Goodchild and C. Martinez for inviting us to work on Amargosa niterwort, and S. McKelvey, C. Baldino, and staff at Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge for their support and permission to collect plant tissues under federal and state permits. Reviews by J. Yee, K. Phillips, M. Brooks, K. McEachern, C. Baldino, and three anonymous reviewers significantly improved our final manuscript. Funding for this project was provided by US Fish and Wildlife Service. Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. government.

Supplementary material

11258_2017_704_MOESM1_ESM.docx (181 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 180 kb)
11258_2017_704_MOESM2_ESM.docx (180 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 179 kb)

References

  1. Allphin L, Harper KT (1994) Habitat requirements for Erigeron kachinensis, a rare endemic of the Colorado Plateau. Great Basin Nat 54:193–203Google Scholar
  2. Asemaneh T, Ghaderian SM, Baker AJM (2007) Responses to Mg/Ca balance in an Iranian serpentine endemic plant, Cleome heratensis (Capparaceae) and a related non-serpentine species, C. foliosa. Plant Soil 293:49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertness MD (1991) Interspecific interactions among high marsh perennials in a New England salt marsh. Ecology 72:125–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blackman VH (1919) The compound interest law and plant growth. Ann Bot 33:353–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blank RR, Young JA, Trent JD, Palmquist DE (1998) Natural history of a saline mound ecosystem. Great Basin Nat 58:217–230Google Scholar
  6. Bolen E (1964) Plant ecology of spring-fed salt marshes in western Utah. Ecology Monogr 34:143–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bush JK (2006) The role of soil moisture, salinity, and oxygen on the growth of Helianthus paradoxus (Asteraceae) in an inland salt marsh of west Texas. J Arid Environ 64:22–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bush JK, Van Auken OW (2004) Relative competitive abilities of Helianthus paradoxus and its progenitors, H. annuus and H. petiolaris (Asteraceae), in varying soil salinities. Int J Plant Sci 165:303–310Google Scholar
  9. Combs JK, Reichard SH, Groom MJ, Wilderman DL, Camp PA (2011) Invasive competitor and native seed predators contribute to rarity of the narrow endemic Astragalus sinuatus Piper. Ecol Appl 21:2498–2509CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Crain CM, Silliman BR, Bertness SL, Bertness MD (2004) Physical and biotic drivers of plant distribution across estuarine salinity gradients. Ecology 85:2539–2549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davies RJP, Mackay DA, Whalen MA (2010) Competitive effects of Phragmites australis on the endangered artesian spring endemic Eriocaulon carsonii. Aquat Bot 92:245–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deacon JE, Williams AE, Williams CD, Williams JE (2007) Fueling population growth in Las Vegas: how large-scale groundwater withdrawal could burn regional biodiversity. Bioscience 57:688–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Debez A, Hamed KB, Grignon C, Abdelly C (2004) Salinity effects on germination, growth, and seed production of the halophyte Cakile maritime. Plant Soil 262:179–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Donovan LA, Richards JH, Schaber EJ (1997) Nutrient relations of a halophytic shrub, Sarcobatus vermiculatus, along a soil salinity gradient. Plant Soil 190:105–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farnsworth EJ, Meyerson LA (2003) Comparative ecophysiology of four wetland plant species along a continuum of invasiveness. Wetlands 23:750–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Flowers TJ, Hajibagheri MA, Clipson NJW (1986) Halophytes. Q Rev Biol 61:313–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gardner SN, Mangel M (1999) Modeling investments in seeds, clonal offspring, and translocation in a clonal plant. Ecology 80:1202–1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hansen DJ, Dayanandan P, Kaufman PB, Brotherson JD (1976) Ecological adaptations of salt marsh grass, Distichlis spicata (Gramineae), and environmental factors affecting its growth and distribution. Am J Bot 63:635–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hasselquist NJ, Allen MF (2009) Increasing demands on limited water resources: consequences for two endangered plants in Amargosa Valley, USA. Am J Bot 96:620–626CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoffmann WA, Poorter H (2002) Avoiding bias in calculations of relative growth rate. Ann Bot 90:37–42CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Houle G, Valéry S (2003) A mixed strategy in the annual endemic Aster laurentianus (Asteraceae)–a stress-tolerant, yet opportunistic species. Am J Bot 90:278–283CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Karrenberg S, Edelist C, Lexer C, Rieseberg L (2006) Response to salinity in the homoploid hybrid species Helianthus paradoxus and its progenitors H. annuus and H. petiolaris. New Phytol 170:615–629CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Knight TA, Clemmer GH (1987) Status of populations of the endemic plants of Ash Meadows, Nye County. Report to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Nevada, p 110Google Scholar
  24. Kohl KI (1997) The effect of NaCl on growth, dry matter allocation and ion uptake in salt marsh and inland populations of America maritime. New Phytol 135:213–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kurban H, Saneoka H, Nehira K, Adilla R, Premachandra GS, Fujita K (1999) Effect of salinity on growth, photosynthesis and mineral composition in leguminous plant Alhagi pseudoalhagi (Bieb.). Soil Sci Plant Nutr 45:851–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Laczniak RJ, DeMeo GA, Reiner SR, Smith JL, Nylund WE (1999) Estimates of ground-water discharge as determined from measurements of evaporation, Ash Meadows Area, Nye County, Nevada. US Geological Survey, Water-Resources Investigations Report 99–4079Google Scholar
  27. Marcum KB (1999) Salinity tolerance mechanisms of grasses in the subfamily Chloridoideae. Crop Sci 39:1153–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Martin AP, Paulson E, Graham R (2013) Geographically disjunct populations and widespread genets in an endangered halophilic plant, the Amargosa niterwort (Nitrophila mohavensis). Conserv Genet 14:953–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (1993) Wetlands. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Murray BR, Thrall PH, Gill AM, Nicotra AB (2002) How plant life-history and ecological traits relate to species rarity and commonness at varying spatial scales. Austral Ecol 27:291–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Patten DT, Rouse L, Stromberg JC (2008) Isolated spring wetlands in the great basin and Mojave deserts, USA. Potential response of vegetation to groundwater withdrawal. Environ Manage 41:398–413CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Pennings SC, Callaway RM (1992) Salt marsh plant zonation: the relative importance of competition and physical factors. Ecology 73:681–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Richards LA (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agriculture handbook No. 60Google Scholar
  34. Rozema J (1991) Growth, water and ion relationships of halophytic monocotyledonae and dicotyledonae: a unified concept. Aquat Bot 39:17–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sakai S (1995) Optimal resource allocation to vegetative and sexual reproduction of a plant growing in a spatially varying environment. J Theor Biol 175:271–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shumway SW (1995) Physiological integration among clonal ramets during invasion of disturbance patches in a New England salt marsh. Ann Bot 76:225–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Silander JA (1985) Microevolution in clonal plants. In: Jackson JBC, Buss LS, Cook RE (eds) Population biology and evolution of clonal organisms. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 107–152Google Scholar
  38. Smart RM, Barko JW (1978) Influence of sediment salinity and nutrients on the physiological ecology of selected salt marsh plants. Estuar Coast Mar Sci 7:487–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Soetaert K, Hoffmann M, Meire P, Starink M, Van Oevelen D, Van Regenmortel S, Cox T (2004) Modeling growth and carbon allocation in two reed beds (Phragmites australis) in the Scheldt estuary. Aquat Bot 79:211–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Soil Ecology and Research Group (2004) Demographics and ecology of the Amargosa niterwort (Nitrophila mohavensis) and Ash Meadows gumplant (Grindelia fraxino-pratensis) of the Carson Slough area. Report to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Nevada, p 16Google Scholar
  41. Steppuhn H, Wang H, Gan Y (1998) Evaluating Russian wild ryegrass emergence from saline seedbeds using the Gompertz function. Can Agric Eng 40:241–247Google Scholar
  42. Tiner RW (2003) Geographically isolated wetlands of the United States. Wetlands 23:494–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ungar IA (1998) Are biotic factors significant in influencing the distribution of halophytes in saline habitats? Bot Rev 64:176–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. US Fish and Wildlife Service (1990) Recovery plan for the endangered and threatened species of Ash Meadows, Nevada. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon, pp 123Google Scholar
  45. Van Auken OW, Bush JK (1998) Spatial relationships of Helianthus paradoxus (Compositae) and associated salt marsh plants. Southwestern Nat 43:313–320Google Scholar
  46. Van Zandt PA, Tobler MA, Mouton E, Hasenstein KH, Mopper S (2003) Positive and negative consequences of salinity stress for the growth and reproduction of the clonal plant, Iris hexagona. J Ecol 91:837–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vandersande MW, Glenn EP, Walworth JL (2001) Tolerance of five riparian plants from the lower Colorado River to salinity, drought and inundation. J Arid Environ 49:147–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Walck JL, Baskin JM, Baskin CC (1999) Relative competitive abilities and growth characteristics of a narrowly endemic and a geographically widespread Solidago species (Asteraceae). Am J Bot 86:820–828CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Warren RS, Brockelman PM (1989) Photosynthesis, respiration, and salt gland activity of Distichlis spicata in relation to soil salinity. Bot Gaz 150:346–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wu L, Enberg AW, Guo X (1997) Effects of elevated selenium and salinity concentrations in root zone on selenium and salt secretion in D. spicata (Distichlis spicata L.). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 37:251–258CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht (outside the USA) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.U.S. Geological SurveyWestern Ecological Research CenterHendersonUSA

Personalised recommendations