Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transurethral en bloc resection with bipolar button electrode for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) using a wire loop is considered the gold standard for staging and treating non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). TURBT is associated with serious disadvantages that facilitate tumor recurrence. The present study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the bipolar button electrode for en bloc resection of NMIBC.

Methods

From January 2013 to July 2016, 82 consecutive patients newly diagnosed with NMIBC received transurethral en bloc resection with bipolar button electrode. Operative details, pathological result, and intraoperative and postoperative complications regarded as safety outcomes were documented. Each patient was followed up for ≥ 18 months.

Results

A total of 118 neoplasms were removed en bloc from 82 patients. The mean tumor diameter was 2.42 ± 1.34 cm. The average operation time was 35 ± 14 min. No complications such as bladder bleeding, vesicle perforation, and obturator nerve reflex occurred during the treatment. Pathological evaluations showed urothelial carcinoma with stage Ta low grade in 26 patients, T1 high grade in 51 patients, and T2 high grade in 5 patients. In addition, the bladder detrusor muscle layer was provided in all cases. The 18-month recurrence-free survival was 88.5% (23/26) and 74.5% (38/51) for Ta and T1 patients, respectively.

Conclusions

The current results demonstrated that transurethral en bloc resection with bipolar button electrode is an effective, feasible, and safe treatment for NMIBC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Babjuk M, Oosterlinck W, Sylvester R et al (2011) EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, the 2011 update. Eur Urol 59:997–1008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. De Berardinis E, Busetto GM, Antonini G et al (2011) T1G3 high-risk NMIBC (non-muscle invasive bladder cancer): conservative treatment versus immediate cystectomy. Int Urol Nephrol 43:1047–1057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Koie T, Ohyama C, Hosogoe S et al (2015) Oncological outcomes of a single but extensive transurethral resection followed by appropriate intra-vesical instillation therapy for newly diagnosed non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Int Urol Nephrol 47:1509–1514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Guo CC, Al-Ahmadie HA, Flaig TW et al (2018) Contribution of bladder cancer pathology assessment in planning clinical trials. Urol Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.01.001

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hurle R, Lazzeri M, Colombo P et al (2016) “En bloc” resection of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer: a prospective single-center study. Urology 90:126–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mariappan P, Zachou A, Grigor KM et al (2010) Detrusor muscle in the first, apparently complete transurethral resection of bladder tumour specimen is a surrogate marker of resection quality, predicts risk of early recurrence, and is dependent on operator experience. Eur Urol 57:843–849

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Weiner AB, Keeter MK, Manjunath A et al (2018) Discrepancies in staging, treatment, and delays to treatment may explain disparities in bladder cancer outcomes: an update from the National Cancer Data Base (2004–2013). Urol Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.12.015

    Google Scholar 

  8. Xishuang S, Deyong Y, Xiangyu C et al (2010) Comparing the safety and efficiency of conventional monopolar, plasmakinetic, and holmium laser transurethral resection of primary non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. J Endourol 24:69–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fritsche HM, Otto W, Eder F et al (2011) Water-jet-aided transurethral dissection of urothelial carcinoma: a prospective clinical study. J Endourol 25:1599–1603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nagele U, Kugler M, Nicklas A et al (2011) Waterjet hydrodissection: first experiences and short-term outcomes of a novel approach to bladder tumor resection. World J Urol 29:423–427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wolters M, Kramer MW, Becker JU et al (2011) Tm:YAG laser en bloc mucosectomy for accurate staging of primary bladder cancer: early experience. World J Urol 29:429–432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Witjes JA, Comperat E, Cowan NC et al (2014) EAU guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer: summary of the 2013 guidelines. Eur Urol 65:778–792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Li Z, Hou R, Li J (2014) The efficacy and safety of simultaneous transurethral GreenLight photoselective vaporization of bladder tumor and prostate in patients with bladder tumor and lower urinary tract symptoms. Int Urol Nephrol 46:691–694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kurth KH, Bouffioux C, Sylvester R et al (2000) Treatment of superficial bladder tumors: achievements and needs. The EORTC Genitourinary Group. Eur Urol 37(Suppl 3):1–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kramer MW, Rassweiler JJ, Klein J et al (2015) En bloc resection of urothelium carcinoma of the bladder (EBRUC): a European multicenter study to compare safety, efficacy, and outcome of laser and electrical en bloc transurethral resection of bladder tumor. World J Urol 33:1937–1943

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pavone-Macaluso M, Lopez-Beltran A, Aragona F, Bassi P et al (2006) The pathology of bladder cancer: an update on selected issues. BJU Int 98:1161–1165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kramer MW, Altieri V, Hurle R et al (2017) Current evidence of transurethral en-bloc resection of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol Focus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2016.12.004

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu YP, Lin TT, Chen SH et al (2016) Comparison of the efficacy and feasibility of en bloc transurethral resection of bladder tumor versus conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumor: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 95:e5372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ukai R, Kawashita E, Ikeda H (2000) A new technique for transurethral resection of superficial bladder tumor in 1 piece. J Urol 163:878–879

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kawada T, Ebihara K, Suzuki T et al (1997) A new technique for transurethral resection of bladder tumors: rotational tumor resection using a new arched electrode. J Urol 157:2225–2226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Saito S (2001) Transurethral en bloc resection of bladder tumors. J Urol 166:2148–2150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang Z, Zeng S, Zhao J et al (2017) A pilot study of vela laser for en bloc resection of papillary bladder cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 15:e311–e314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Puppo P, Bertolotto F, Introini C et al (2009) Bipolar transurethral resection in saline (TURis): outcome and complication rates after the first 1000 cases. J Endourol 23:1145–1149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Reich O, Schlenker B, Gratzke C et al (2010) Plasma vaporisation of the prostate: initial clinical results. Eur Urol 57:693–697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mashni J, Godoy G, Haarer C et al (2014) Prospective evaluation of plasma kinetic bipolar resection of bladder cancer: comparison to monopolar resection and pathologic findings. Int Urol Nephrol 46:1699–1705

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Geavlete B, Multescu R, Georgescu D et al (2011) Innovative technique in nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer-bipolar plasma vaporization. Urology 77:849–854

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Geavlete B, Jecu M, Multescu R et al (2010) TURis plasma vaporization in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer—the first Romanian experience with a new technique. J Med Life 3:100–105

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Canter DJ, Ogan K, Master VA (2012) Initial North American experience with the use of the Olympus Button Electrode for vaporization of bladder tumors. Can J Urol 19:6211–6216

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen X, Liao J, Chen L et al (2015) En bloc transurethral resection with 2-micron continuous-wave laser for primary non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a randomized controlled trial. World J Urol 33:989–995

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Naselli A, Puppo P (2017) En bloc transurethral resection of bladder tumors: a new standard? J Endourol 31:S20–S24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81472389).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xudong Yao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

All procedures involving human participants were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Research Committee and the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, J., Wang, L., Mao, S. et al. Transurethral en bloc resection with bipolar button electrode for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Int Urol Nephrol 50, 619–623 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-018-1830-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-018-1830-0

Keywords

Navigation