Skip to main content
Log in

Productive dissent in learning communities

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

“Community” has become a commonplace term in the learning sciences. Alongside this popularization comes the view that communities are, in general, something to strive towards. We draw on contemporary trends to problematize this assumption and motivate a discussion for the productivity of dissent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We note, as Collins does, that conserving communities still involve a great deal of learning.

References

  • Bielaczyc, K., & Collins, A. (1999). Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practice. Instructional-Design Theories and Models, 2, 269–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L., Metz, K. E., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Social interaction and individual understanding in a community of learners: The influence of Piaget and Vygotsky. Piaget-Vygotsky: The social genesis of thought (pp. 145–170). Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A. (1998). Learning communities: A commentary on chapters by Brown, Ellery, and Campione, and by Riel. In J. G. Greeno & S. V. Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning (pp. 399–405). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoicates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doebel, S., & Munakata, Y. (2018). Group influences on engaging self-control: Children delay gratification and value it more when their in-group delays and their out-group doesn’t. Psychological Science, 29(5), 738–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, F. (2008). The scientist as rebel. New York: New York Review Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. K. (1993). Against method. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. K. (2011). The tyranny of science. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fong, C., & Slotta, J. D. (2018). Supporting communities of learners in the elementary classroom: the common knowledge learning environment. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9463-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forscher, P. S., & Kteily, N. (2018). A psychological profile of the alt-right. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/C9UVW.

  • Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hod, Y. & Ben-Zvi, D. (2018). Co-development patterns of knowledge, experience, and self in humanistic knowledge building communities. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9459-z.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapur, M. (2016). Examining productive failure, productive success, unproductive failure, and unproductive success in learning. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, S. O., Ammirati, R., & Landfield, K. (2009). Giving debiasing away. Can psychological research on correcting cognitive errors promote human welfare? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 390–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, J. Y., & Hall, R. (2018). Learning a part together: ensemble learning and infrastructure in a competitive high school marching band. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9455-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melser, D. (2004). The act of thinking. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagle, A. (2017). The lost boys: The young men of the alt-right could define American politics for a generation. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/.

  • Smith, F. (1988). Joining the literacy club. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao, D., & Zhang, J. (2018). Forming shared inquiry structures to support knowledge building in a grade 5 community. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9462-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trninic, D., Wagner, R., & Kapur, M. (2018). Rethinking failure in mathematics education: A historical appeal. Thinking Skills and Creativity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.03.008.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dragan Trninic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Trninic, D., Swanson, H. & Kapur, M. Productive dissent in learning communities. Instr Sci 46, 621–625 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9466-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9466-0

Keywords

Navigation