Skip to main content
Log in

Conception rates and calving intervals of different beef breeds at a farm in the semi-arid region of Namibia

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A retrospective study from 2004 to 2017 investigated the effect of bull age, cow age and breed on conception rates, and calving intervals of beef cattle at Neudamm farm, Khomas region, Namibia. Bulls ranging from 4 to 14 years of age were used to breed cows up to 17 years of age. A total of 1804 pregnancies were diagnosed in Afrikaner (81.8%), Nguni (14.1%), and Simmental (4.1%) cows. The overall conception rate of beef cattle during the study period was 71.7 ± 9.5%. The overall conception rate of the Nguni cows (78.3%) was significantly higher than that of the Afrikaner (70.9%) and the Simmental cows (64.9%) (p < 0.05). The age of sires had no effect on overall conception rate in all three breeds (p > 0.05). Afrikaner dams more than 10 years old had the least rate of conception (60.4%, p < 0.05) within that breed category. Nguni dams between four to 10 years had the greatest conception rate (86.5%, p < 0.05). Age of dams had no effect on conception rates in Simmental cattle (p > 0.05). The overall mean length of all calving intervals in the Nguni cows (366 ± 35 days) was significantly shorter than those of the Afrikaner cows (487 ± 62 days) and the Simmental cows (484 ± 110 days) (p < 0.05). The 2013 breeding season produced the highest overall conception rates (~ 85%), and the 2007 breeding season produced the lowest overall conception rate (~ 51%). From a fertility point of view, the Nguni breed seemed best suited for the semi-arid conditions which are prevalent in most of Namibia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anon, 2008. Nguni cattle [WWW Document]. Anim. Heal. Compedium. URL https://www-cabi-org.ezproxy.unam.edu.na/ahpc/datasheet/73374 (accessed 11.3.17).

  • Argiris, A., Ondho, Y.S., Santoso, S.I., Kurnianto, E., 2018. Effect of Age and Bulls on Fresh Semen Quality and Frozen Semen Production of Holstein Bulls in Indonesia. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 119, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/119/1/012033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baez, G.M., Barletta, R. V., Guenther, J.N., Gaska, J.M., Wiltbank, M.C., 2016. Effect of uterine size on fertility of lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 85, 1357–1366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.04.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beukes, E.(2018). Farm manager, Neudamm farm. Personal communication

  • Bhagat, R.L., Gokhale, S.B., 2016. Studies on factors influencing conception rate in rural cattle. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 86, 550–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brameld, J.M., Greenwood, P.L., Bell, A.W., 2010. Biological Mechanisms of Fetal Development Relating to Postnatal Growth, Efficiency and Carcass Characteristics in Ruminants, in: Greenwood, P.L., Bell, A.W., Vercoe, P.E., Viljoen, G.J. (Eds.), Managing the Prenatal Environment to Enhance Livestock Productivity. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, New York, pp. 93–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzanskas, M.E., Grossi, D. do A., Ventura, R.V., Schenkel, F.S., Chud, T.C.S., Stafuzza, N.B., Rola, L.D., Meirelles, S.L.C., Mokry, F.B., Mudadu, M. de A., Higa, R.H., da Silva, M.V.G.B., de Alencar, M.M., Regitano, L.C. de A., Munari, D.P., 2017. Candidate genes for male and female reproductive traits in Canchim beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-017-0199-8

  • Carvalheira, J.G., Blake, R.W., Pollak, E.J., Van Soest, P.J., 1995. Comparison of Landim and Africander cattle in southern Mozambique: II. Female fertility, reproduction, and beef offtake. J. Anim. Sci. 73, 3527. https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.73123527x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corah, L., Lusby, K., 2000. Factors Influencing Conception Rate (No. BCH-2210), Beef Cattle Handbook. Madison.

  • Cordeiro, M.B., Peres, M.S., de Souza, J.M., Gaspar, P., Barbiere, F., Sá Filho, M.F., Filho, M.M., Dinardi, R.N., Nogueira, G.P., Mesquita, F.S., Pugliesi, G., Martins, T., Binelli, M., Membrive, C.M.B., 2015. Supplementation with sunflower seed increases circulating cholesterol concentrations and potentially impacts on the pregnancy rates in Bos indicus beef cattle. Theriogenology 83, 1461–1468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.01.022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • D’Occhio, M.J., Baruselli, P.S., Campanile, G., 2018. Influence of nutrition, body condition, and metabolic status on reproduction in female beef cattle: A review. Theriogenology 125, 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.11.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Rensis, F., Garcia-Ispierto, I., Lopez-Gatius, F., 2015. Seasonal heat stress: Clinical implications and hormone treatments for the fertility of dairy cows. Theriogenology 84, 659–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diskin, M.G., Kenny, D.A., 2014. Optimising reproductive performance of beef cows and replacement heifers. Animal 8, 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111400086X

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ducháček, J., Biniová, Z., Stádník, L., Ptáček, M., Doležalová, M., Beran, J., 2015. Effect of breed on basic characteristics of bull semen immediately after collection. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 50, 51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, P., Clayton, E., Bell, A., 2017. Developmental programming and beef production. Anim. Front. 7, 38. https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2017-0127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grobler, S.M., Scholtz, M.M., Greyling, J.P.C., Neser, F.W.C., 2014. Reproduction performance of beef cattle mated naturally following synchronization in the Central Bushveld bioregion of South Africa. South African J. Anim. Sci. 44, S70–S74. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v44i5.14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Júnior, D.R.O., Dias, E.A.R., Campanholi, S.P., Monteiro, F.M., Paz, C.C.P., Mercadante, M.E.Z., 2016. Relationship between scrotal circumference of nellore bulls and cow pregnancy rate in natural mating. Bol. Indústria Anim. 73, 319–328. https://doi.org/10.17523/bia.v73n4p319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamga-Waladjo, A.R., Tebug, S.F., Keambouc, T.C., Ndambid, O.A., Ndukume, J.A., Thiam, O., 2011. Factors influencing conception rates of cameroonian zebu cattle (Bos indicus) following oestrus synchronisation and artificial insemination. Anim. Heal. Prod. 59, 227–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandiwa, E., Madzingira, O., Mushonga, B., Samkange, A., Bishi, A., Nyoni, N., 2017. A 13-year retrospective study of the beef and dairy cattle losses at Neudamm Farm in the Khomas region of Namibia. Alexandria J. Vet. Sci. 55, 8. https://doi.org/10.5455/ajvs.270379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kastelic, J.P., 2013. Male involvement in fertility and factors affecting semen quality in bulls. Anim. Front. 3, 20–25. https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2013-0029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemma, A., Shemsu, T., 2015. Effect of age and breed on semen quality and breeding soundness evaluation of pre-service young bulls. J. Reprod. Infertil. 6, 35–40. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.jri.2015.6.2.94131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn, J., Jarvis, A., Roberts, C., Robertson, T., 2002. Atlas of Namibia. A Portrait of the Land and its People. David Philip Publishers, Cape Town. https://doi.org/10.1002/mmnz.20040800111

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mir, M.A., Naha, B.C., Valsalan, J., Veterinary, K., Patil, C., Sciences, A., 2015. Optimizing age of bull at first use in relation to fertility of Murrah breeding bulls. Vet. World 8, 518–522. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2015.518-522

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mollah, M.F.K., Gofur, M.R., Asaduzzaman, K.M., Bhuiyan, M.M.U., 2015. Conception rate of non-descript Zebu cows and its attributing factors in Bangladesh. Res. J. Vet. Sci. 8, 42–51. https://doi.org/10.3923/rjvs.2015.42.51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moorad, J.A., Nussey, D.H., 2016. Evolution of maternal effect senescence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, 362–367. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1520494113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mushonga, B., Chiwome, B., Kandiwa, E., 2017a. Persistent corpus luteum in a 9 year-old Afrikaner cow: a case report. Glob. Vet. 18, 146–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mushonga, B., Twiyizeyimna, S., Habarugira, G., Kandiwa, E., Chinyoka, S., Samkange, A., Bishi, A., 2017b. Study of incidence of gross urogenital lesions and abnormalities on does slaughtered at Nyagatare slaughterhouse, Eastern Province, Rwanda. J. Vet. Med. 2017, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7564019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mwai, O., Hanotte, O., Kwon, Y.J., Cho, S., 2015. African indigenous cattle: unique genetic resources in a rapidly changing world. Asian-Australasian J. Anim. Sci. 28, 911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nava-Trujillo, H., Hernández, A., Hernández-Fonseca, H., Soto-Belloso, E., Perea-Ganchou, F., 2005. 154 effects of the breed and season on the fertility of tropical dual purpose cows. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 18, 184–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishimwe, K., Bizimana, J., Manishimwe, R., Ayabagabo, J., Byukusenge, M., Habimana, R., Bareeba, F., 2015. Factors affecting the pregnancy rate in small scale dairy farms after the artificial insemination in rural area, Rwanda. Int. J. Livest. Res. 5, 19. https://doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20150316053842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noseir, W.M., 2013. Disorders of the postpartum bovine uterus: A Literature Review. MRVSA Wael MB. Noseir 2, 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagthinathan, M., Dasinaa, S., Nafees, M.S.M., Ramees, M.L.M., 2016. Effects of environmental and animal factors on conception rate at the time of insemination of Shahiwal cattle in dry zone of Sri Lanka [WWW Document]. E-Repository.

  • Pala, A., Mccraw, R., 2005. Replacement heifer selection in a beef cattle herd. Am. J. Appl. Sci. 2, 542–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parr, M.H., Crowe, M.A., Lonergan, P., Evans, A.C.O., Fair, T., Diskin, M.G., 2015. The concurrent and carry over effects of long term changes in energy intake before insemination on pregnancy per artificial insemination in heifers. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 87–94.

  • Perea F., Soto E., Hernández H., González D., Palomares R., De Ondiz A., González C., 2006. Monthly variation of fertility and oestrus frequency in crossbred dual-purpose cows in three agroecological areas of the South American tropics. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 38, 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-006-4316-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, G., 2005. Factors Affecting Breeding Success, in: The Range Beef Cow Symposium XIX. Rapid City, South Dakota, pp. 1–12.

  • Ramsay, J.M., 2017. Maximizing Use of an Extension Beef Cattle Data Set : Part 2 — Reproductive Rates. J. Ext. 55, 1–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawat, S., Nain, A.., Roy, S., 2014. Biometeorological aspects of conception rate in cattle. J. Agrometeorol. 16, 116–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakatani, M., Balboula, A.Z., Yamanaka, K., Takahashi, M., 2012. Effect of summer heat environment on body temperature, estrous cycles and blood antioxidant levels in Japanese Black cow. Anim. Sci. J. 83, 394–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2011.00967.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, J., 2012. Productive Longevity in Beef Cows, in: BIF Meeting. Houston, pp. 1–12.

  • Schoeman, S.J., 1989. Recent research into the production potential of indigenous cattle with special reference to the Sanga. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 19.

  • Stangroom, J., 2018. Social Science Statistics [WWW Document]. Soc. Sci. Stat. URL http://www.socscistatistics.com/Default.aspx (accessed 11.2.17).

  • Strydom, P.E., 2008. Do indigenous Southern African cattle breeds have the right genetics for commercial production of quality meat? Meat Sci. 80, 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.04.017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thirunavukkarasu, M., Kathiravan, G., 2009. Factors affecting conception rates in artificially inseminated bovines. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 79, 871–875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titterington, F.M., Lively, F.O., Dawson, S., Morrison, S.J., 2016. The effects of breed , month of parturition , and progeny gender on beef cow fertility. Adv. Anim. Biosci. 8, s67–s71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toledo-Alvarado, H., Cecchinato, A., Bittante, G., 2017. Fertility traits of Holstein, Brown Swiss, Simmental, and Alpine Grey cows are differently affected by herd productivity and milk yield of individual cows. J. Dairy Sci. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-12442

  • Upadhyay, V.K., Tomar, A.K.S., Patel, B.H.M., 2015. Effect of early weaning on milking behaviour , production and reproduction of Tharparkar cows. Indian J. Dairy Sci. 68, 477–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utt, M.D., 2016. Prediction of bull fertility. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 169, 37–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the University of Namibia’s Neudamm Campus management for availing the data which was used in this research. The authors also wish to sincerely thank the University of Namibia for funding the publication of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Samkange, A., Kandiwa, E., Mushonga, B. et al. Conception rates and calving intervals of different beef breeds at a farm in the semi-arid region of Namibia. Trop Anim Health Prod 51, 1829–1837 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-019-01876-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-019-01876-4

Keywords

Navigation