Abstract
We investigated the differences between weaning rates and technologies adopted by farmers in cow-calf production systems in Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Interviews were carried out with 73 farmers about 48 technologies that could affect reproductive performance. Data were analyzed by multivariate analysis using a non-hierarchical cluster method. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05. Three distinct clusters of farmers were created (R 2 = 0.90), named as low (LWR), intermediate (IWR), and high (HWR) weaning rate, with 100, 91, and 96 % of the farmers identified within their respective groups and average weaning rates of 59, 72, and 83 %, respectively. IWR and HWR farmers used more improved natural pasture, fixed-time artificial insemination, selection for birth weight, and proteinated salt compared to LWR. HWR farmers used more stocking rate control, and IWR farmers used more ultrasound to evaluate reproductive performance compared to the LWR group. IWR and HWR adopted more technologies related to nutrition and reproductive aspects of the herd in comparison to LWR. We concluded that farmers with higher technology use on farm had higher weaning rates which could be used to benefit less efficient farmers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ABIEC, 2014. ABIEC of Association of Brazilian Beef Exporters. Brazilian beef profile 2012. http://www.abiec.com.br/3_pecuaria.asp. Accessed 25 mar 2014
Aleixo, S.S., de Souza, J.G. and Ferraudo, A.S., 2007. Multivariate analysis that can be used to determine of dairy producers homogeneous groups, Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 36, 2168–2175
Anderson, D.R., Sweeney, D.J. and Williams, T., 2003. Essentials of statistics for business and economics, (Mason, South-Western)
ANUALPEC, 2012. ANUALPEC of Anuário da Pecuária Brasileira, (AgraFNP, São Paulo)
Baruselli, P.S., Sales, J.N.S., Sala, R.V., Vieira, L.M. and Sá Filho, M.F., 2012. History, evolution and perspectives of timed artificial insemination programs in Brazil, Animal Reproduction, 9, 139–152
Bó, G.A. and Baruselli, P.S., 2014. Synchronization of ovulation and fixed-time artificial insemination in beef cattle, Animal, 8, 144–150
Borges, J.A.R., Oude Lansink, A.G.J.M., C. Ribeiro, C.M. and Lutke, V., 2014. Understanding farmers’ intention to adopt improved natural grassland using the theory of planned behavior, Livestock Science, 169, 163–174
Díaz-Solís, H., Grant, W.E., Kothmann, M.M., Teague, W.R. and Díaz-García, J. A., 2009. Adaptive management of stocking rates to reduce effects of drought on cow-calf production systems in semi-arid rangelands, Agricultural Systems, 100, 43–50
Dill, M.D., Dalla Corte, V.F., Barcellos, J.O.J., Canozzi, M.E.A. and Oliveira, T.E., 2013. Análise comparativa da competividade do Brasil e EUA no mercado internacional da carne bovina, Revista Ceres, 60, 765–771
Diskin, M.G. and Kenny, D.A. 2014. Optimising reproductive performance of beef cows and replacement heifers, Animal, 8, 27–39
Fouz, R., Gandoy, F., Sanjuán, M.L., Yus, E. and Diéguez, F.G., 2013. The use of crossbreeding with beef bulls in dairy herds: effects on calving difficulty and gestation length, Animal, 7, 211–215
Funston, R.N., Martin, J.L., Larson, D.M. and Roberts, A.J., 2012a. Physiology and Endocrinology Symposium: Nutritional aspects of developing replacement heifers, Journal of Animal Science, 90, 1166–1171
Funston, R.N., Summers, A.F. and Roberts, A.J., 2012b. Alpharma Beef Cattle Nutrition Symposium: Implications of nutritional management for beef cow-calf systems, Journal of Animal Science, 90, 2301–2307
Gaspar, P., Mesías, F.J., Escribano, M. and Pulido, F. 2009. Assessing the technical efficiency of extensive livestock farming systems in Extremadura, Spain, Livestock Science, 121, 7–14
IBGE, 2006. IBGE of Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Censo Agropecuário 2006. http://www.ibge.gov.br. Accessed 11 mar 2014
IBGE, 2012. IBGE of Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Produção da pecuária municipal 2011. http://www.ibge.gov.br. Accessed 25 mar 2014
Lampert, V.N. Barcellos, J.O.J., Kliemann Neto, F.J., Canellas, L.C., Dill, M.D. and Canozzi, M.E.A., 2012. Development and application of a bioeconomic efficiency index for beef cattle production in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 41, 775–782
Lopes, C.N., Cooke, R.F., Reis, M.M., Peres, R.F.G. and Vasconcelos, J.L.M., 2011. Strategic supplementation of calcium salts of polyunsaturated fatty acids to enhance reproductive performance of Bos indicus beef cows. Journal Animal Science, 89, 3116–3124
MAPA, 2011. MAPA of Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Agronegócio Brasileiro em números. Pecuária – evolução da produção 1960–2010. http://www.agricultura.gov.br. Accessed 25 mar 2014
Marques, P.R., Barcellos, J.O.J., McManus, C., Oaigen, R.P., Collares, F.C., Canozzi, M.E.A. and Lampert, V.N., 2011. Competitiveness of beef farming in Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil, Agricultural Systems, 104, 689–693
Marques, P.R., Barcellos, J.O.J., Dill, M.D., Dias, E.A., Azevedo, E.V.T., Lampert, V.N. and McManus, C.M., 2014. Competitiveness levels in cattle herd farms, Ciência Rural, 45, 480–484
Martins, P.G.M.A., Arthington, J.D., Cooke, R.F., Lamb, C.G., Araújo, D.B., Torres, C.A.A., Guimarães, J.D. and Mancio, A.B.., 2012. Evaluation of beef cow and calf separation systems to improve reproductive performance of first-calf cows, Livestock Science, 15, 74–79
Mee, J.F., 2013. Why do so many calves die on modern dairy farms and what can we do about calf welfare in the future? Animals, 3, 1036–1057
Oaigen, R.P., Barcellos, J.O.J., Soares, J.C.R., Lampert, V.N., Gottschall, C.S., Marques, P.R. and Tavares, H.R., 2013. Beef cattle production system competitiveness in the South of Brazil, Archivos de Zootecnia, 62, 161–170
Pruitt, J.R., Gillespie, J.M., Nehring, R.F. and Qushim, B., 2012. Adoption of technology, management practices, and production systems by U.S. beef cow-calf producers, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 44, 203–222
Sá Filho, M.F., Marques, M.O., Girotto R., Santos, F.A., Sala, R.V., Barbuio, J.P. and Baruselli, P.S., 2014. Resynchronization with unknown pregnancy status using progestin-based timed artificial insemination protocol in beef cattle, Theriogenology, 81, 284–290
SENAR, 2005. Diagnóstico de sistemas de produção de bovinocultura de corte no estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Relatório, (SENAR, Porto Alegre)
Tanure, S., Pötter, B.A.A., Lobato, J.F., 2011. Natural and improved natural pastures on the reproductive performance of first-calf beef cows, Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 40, 690–699
Ward, C.E., Vestal, M.K., Doye, D.G. and Lalman, D.L., 2008. Factors affecting adoption of cow-calf production practices in Oklahoma, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 40, 851–863
Zaborski, D., Grzesiak, W., Szatkowska, I., Dybus, A., Muszynska, M., and Jedrzejczak, M., 2009. Factors affecting dystocia in cattle, Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 44, 540–551
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) for supporting this study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dill, M.D., Pereira, G.R., Costa, J.B.G. et al. Technologies that affect the weaning rate in beef cattle production systems. Trop Anim Health Prod 47, 1255–1260 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-015-0856-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-015-0856-x