Advertisement

Tribology Letters

, 66:64 | Cite as

Slurry Erosion Wear Resistance and Impact-Induced Phase Transformation of Titanium Alloys

  • Xiulin Ji
  • Qinyu Qing
  • Cuicui Ji
  • Jiangbo Cheng
  • Yingtao Zhang
Original Paper

Abstract

Erosion wear resistance and impact-induced phase transformation of titanium alloys TA2 (pure Ti), TC4 (Ti–6Al–4V) and TC11 (Ti–6.5Al–3.5Mo–1.5Zr–0.3Si) were investigated using a slurry jet tester. The slurry erosion wear resistance of TA2 is comparable to that of 304 stainless steel, especially at the impingement angle 90°. Although TC4 and TC11 have higher hardness, TA2 possesses the best erosion wear resistance except TC11 at 15°. With the increasing erosion time, the eroded surface hardness of TC11 at the impingement angle 90° increases and then decreases, while the volume loss rate drops in the first 15 min, then increases until 30 min, and then slightly decreases again. With XRD characterization and SEM observation, erosion-induced phase transformation from metastable β-phase to α-phase is proved on the surface of titanium alloy TC11. And the thickness of visible phase transformation layer is about 10 μm. Phase transformation influences the erosive wear mechanism of titanium alloys. At the impingement angle of 30°, the material removal of TC4 and TC11 can be described as micro-plowing and lip extruding, while plowing mark is not a typical surface morphology of TA2, indicating a better work-harden ability. So, stabilizing β-phase can be an effective way to improve the erosion wear resistance of titanium alloys.

Keywords

Wear resistance Slurry erosion Microstructure evolution Phase transformation Titanium alloy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51475140, 51711530226).

References

  1. 1.
    Lisiecki, A., Kurc-Lisiecka, A.: Erosion wear resistance of titanium-matrix composite Ti/Tin produced by diode-laser gas nitriding. Mater. Tehnol. 51(1), 29–34 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ding, H.Y., Dai, Z.D., Zhou, F., Zhou, G.H.: Sliding friction and wear behavior of TC11 in aqueous condition. Wear 263, 117–124 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2007.01.106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Khayatan, N., Ghasemi, H.M., Abedini, M.: Synergistic erosion–corrosion behavior of commercially pure titanium at various impingement angles. Wear 380–381, 154–162 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2017.03.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dong, H., Bloyce, A., Bell, T.: Slurry abrasion response of surface engineered Ti6Al4VELI. Tribol. Int. 32(9), 517–526 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-679X(99)00082-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, F.-J., Yao, C., Yang, Z.-G.: Failure analysis on abnormal wall thinning of heat-transfer titanium tubes of condensers in nuclear power plant Part II: Erosion and cavitation corrosion. Eng. Fail. Anal. 37((Supplement C)), 42–52 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fu, Y.Q., Du, H.J., Gu, Y.W.: Improvement of erosion resistance of titanium with different surface treatments. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 9(5), 571–579 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1361/105994900770345719 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mann, B.S.: Water droplet and cavitation erosion behavior of laser-treated stainless steel and titanium alloy: their similarities. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 22(12), 3647–3656 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-013-0660-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Duraiselvam, M., Galun, R., Wesling, V., Mordike, B.L., Reiter, R., Oligmuller, J., Buvanashekaran, G.: Improvement of the cavitation erosion resistance of Ti–6Al–4V through laser alloying titanium aluminide based intermetallic matrix composites. Lasers Eng. 16(5–6), 423–436 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dong, H., Xing, L.D.: The research on the mechanism and prevention of solid particle erosion for titanium alloy. In: Ti-2011: Proceedings Of the 12th World Conference on Titanium, vol. Iii, pp. 1877–1880 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Du, J., Zhang, P., Zhao, J.J., Cai, Z.H.: Erosion-resistant PVD ZrAlCuN coating for titanium alloy. Adv. Compos. Pts 1 And 2 150-151, 51–55 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.150-151.51 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grogler, T., Zeiler, E., Franz, A., Plewa, O., Rosiwal, S.M., Singer, R.F.: Erosion resistance of CVD diamond-coated titanium alloy for aerospace applications. Surf. Coat. Technol. 112(1–3), 129–132 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(98)00800-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sahoo, R., Mantry, S., Sahoo, T.K., Mishra, S., Jha, B.B.: Effect of microstructural variation on erosion wear behavior of Ti–6Al–4V Alloy. Tribol. Trans. 56(4), 555–560 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10402004.2013.767400 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shao, S., Xi, H.Z., Chang, Y.P.: Study on the Salt Spray Corrosion and Erosion Behavior of TC4 Titanium Alloy. Fundamental Of Chemical Engineering, Pts 1–3(233–235), 2409–2412 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.233-235.2409 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kumar, N., Shukla, M.: Finite element analysis of multi-particle impact on erosion in abrasive water jet machining of titanium alloy. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 236(18), 4600–4610 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2012.04.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bermudez, M.D., Carrion, F.J., Martinez-Nicolas, G., Lopez, R.: Erosion-corrosion of stainless steels, titanium, tantalum and zirconium. Wear 258(1–4), 693–700 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2004.09.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mochizuki, H., Yokota, M., Hattori, S.: Effects of materials and solution temperatures on cavitation erosion of pure titanium and titanium alloy in seawater. Wear 262(5–6), 522–528 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2006.06.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huang, L., Folkes, J., Kinnell, P., Shipway, P.H.: Mechanisms of damage initiation in a titanium alloy subjected to water droplet impact during ultra-high pressure plain waterjet erosion. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 212(9), 1906–1915 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.04.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Neville, A., McDougall, B.A.B.: Erosion- and cavitation-corrosion of titanium and its alloys. Wear 250, 726–735 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(01)00709-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fidan, S., Avcu, E., Karakulak, E., Yamanoglu, R., Zeren, M., Sinmazcelik, T.: Effect of heat treatment on erosive wear behaviour of Ti6Al4V alloy. Mater. Sci. Technol. 29(9), 1088–1094 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1179/1743284713Y.0000000239 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yang, J., Swisher, J.H.: Erosion–corrosion behavior and cathodic protection of alloys in seawater-sand slurries. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2(6), 843–850 (1993).  https://doi.org/10.1007/Bf02645684 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mitelea, I., Bordeasu, I., Utu, I.D., Karancsi, O.: Improvement of the cavitation erosion resistance of titanium alloys deposited by plasma spraying and remelted by laser. Mater. Plast. 53(1), 29–33 (2016)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cai, F., Gao, F., Pant, S., Huang, X., Yang, Q.: Solid particle erosion behaviors of carbon-fiber epoxy composite and pure titanium. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 25(1), 290–296 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-015-1848-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lindgren, M., Perolainen, J.: Slurry pot investigation of the influence of erodant characteristics on the erosion resistance of titanium. Wear 321, 64–69 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2014.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
    Ji, X.L., Han, X., Zhou, M.Y., Liu, J.Q.: Effect of heat treatment on the slurry erosion resistance of high strength steel DP980. Int. J. Mater. Res. 105(5), 487–492 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhao, X., Xue, G., Liu, Y.: Gradient crystalline structure induced by ultrasonic impacting and rolling and its effect on fatigue behavior of TC11 titanium alloy. Results Phys. 7(Supplement C), 1845–1851 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2017.05.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Davis, B.L.: Semiquantitative XRD analysis with the aid of reference intensity ratio estimates. Powder Diffr. 13(3), 185–187 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0885715600010083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Mechanical and Electrical EngineeringHohai UniversityChangzhouChina
  2. 2.College of Mechanics and MaterialsHohai UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations