Transport in Porous Media

, Volume 92, Issue 3, pp 819–835 | Cite as

Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery in Fractional-Wet Systems: A Pore-Scale Investigation

Article

Abstract

Microbial enhanced oil recovery (MEOR) is a technology that could potentially increase the tertiary recovery of oil from mature oil formations. However, the efficacy of this technology in fractional-wet systems is unknown, and the mechanisms involved in oil mobilization therefore need further investigation. Our MEOR strategy consists of the injection of ex situ produced metabolic byproducts produced by Bacillus mojavensis JF-2 (which lower interfacial tension (IFT) via biosurfactant production) into fractional-wet cores containing residual oil. Two different MEOR flooding solutions were tested; one solution contained both microbes and metabolic byproducts while the other contained only the metabolic byproducts. The columns were imaged with X-ray computed microtomography (CMT) after water flooding, and after MEOR, which allowed for the evaluation of the pore-scale processes taking place during MEOR. Results indicate that the larger residual oil blobs and residual oil held under relatively low capillary pressures were the main fractions recovered during MEOR. Residual oil saturation, interfacial curvatures, and oil blob sizes were measured from the CMT images and used to develop a conceptual model for MEOR in fractional-wet systems. Overall, results indicate that MEOR was effective at recovering oil from fractional-wet systems with reported additional oil recovered (AOR) values between 44 and 80%; the highest AOR values were observed in the most oil-wet system.

Keywords

Microbial enhanced oil recovery X-ray microtomography Multiphase flow Interfacial curvature 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

11242_2011_9934_MOESM1_ESM.doc (23 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 23 kb)
11242_2011_9934_MOESM2_ESM.eps (2.1 mb)
ESM 2 (EPS 2158 kb)
11242_2011_9934_MOESM3_ESM.eps (5.3 mb)
ESM 3 (EPS 5405 kb)
11242_2011_9934_MOESM4_ESM.eps (1 mb)
ESM 4 (EPS 1070 kb)
11242_2011_9934_MOESM5_ESM.eps (768 kb)
ESM 5 (EPS 768 kb)
11242_2011_9934_MOESM6_ESM.eps (363 kb)
ESM 6 (EPS 364 kb)

References

  1. Afrapoli, M.S., Alipour, S., Torsaeter, O.: Effect of Wettability on Interfacial Tension on Microbial Improved Oil Recovery with Rhodococuss sp 094. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 129707 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. Al-Raoush R.I.: Impact of wettability on pore-scale characteristics of residual nonaqueous phase liquids. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43(13), 4796–4801 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Raoush R.I., Willson C.S.: A pore-scale investigation of a multiphase porous media system. J. Contam. Hydrol. 77(1–2), 67–89 (2005a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Al-Raoush R.I., Willson C.S.: Extraction of physically realistic pore network properties from three-dimensional synchrotron X-ray microtomography images of unconsolidated porous media systems. J. Hydrol. 300(1–4), 44–64 (2005b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amott E.: Observations relating to the wettability of porous rock. Trans. AIME 216, 156–162 (1959)Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, W.G.: Wettability literature servey—part 1: rock/oil/brine interactions and the effects of core handling on wettability. J. Pet. Eng. 36(11) (1986)Google Scholar
  7. Bobek, J.E., Foster, J.F., Risser, J.K.: Determination of Wettability-G-UW-45, Internal Report No. L-52, April, 10, Saudi Aramco (1956)Google Scholar
  8. Bordoloi N.K., Konwar B.K.: Microbial surfactant-enhanced mineral oil recovery under laboratory conditions. Colloids Surf. B-Biointerfaces 63(1), 73–82 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chase, K.L., Bryant, R.S., Burchfield, T.E., Bertus, K.M., Stepp, A.K.: Investigations of microbial mechanisms for oil mobilization in porous media. In: Donalsdon, E.C. Microbial Enhancement of Oil Recovery—Recent Advances, Elservier, Amsterdam (1990)Google Scholar
  10. Culligan K.A., Wildenschild D., Christensen B.S.B., Gray W.G., Rivers M.L., Tompson A.F.B.: Interfacial area measurements for unsaturated flow through a porous medium. Water Resour. Res. 40, W12413 (2004). doi:10.1029/2004WR003278 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Donaldson, E.C., Thomas, R.D., Lorenz, P.B.: Wettability determination and its effect on recovery efficiency. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 1, 13–20 (1969)Google Scholar
  12. Fatt, I., Aime M., Klikoff, W.: Effect of Fractional Wettability on Multiphase Flow Through Porous Media, Technical Note, Petroleum Transactions. AIME, October, 1959Google Scholar
  13. Graue, A., Bognø, T., Moe, R.W., Baldwin, B.A., Spinler, E.A., Maloney, D., Tobola, D.P.: Impacts of wettability on capillary pressure and relative permeability. SCA9907, International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, Golden, Co, USA, Aug 1–4, 1–14 (1999)Google Scholar
  14. Gray, M.R., Yeung, A., Foght, J.M., Julia, M., Harvey, Y.W.: Potential Microbial enhanced Oil Recovery Processes: A Critical Analysis. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 114676 (2008)Google Scholar
  15. Han J., Jin Y., Willson C.S.: Virus retention and transport in chemically heterogeneous porous media under saturated and unsaturated flow conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 1547–1555 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Javaheri M., Jenneman G.E., McInerney M.J., Knapp R.M.: Anaerobic production of a biosurfactant by Bacillus-licheniformis JF-2. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 50(3), 698–700 (1985)Google Scholar
  17. Jenneman G.E., McInerney M.J., Knapp R.M., Clark J.B., Ferro J.M., Revus D.E., Menzie D.E.: a halotolerant biosurfactant-producing bacillus species potentially useful for enhanced oil recovery, chapter 45. Dev. Ind. Microbial. 24, 485–492 (1983)Google Scholar
  18. Karpyn Z.T., Piri M., Singh G.: Experimental investigation of trapped oil clusters in a water-wet bead pack using x-ray microtomography. Water Resour. Res. 46, 25 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kianipey, S.A.D.: Mechanisms of Oil Displacement by Microorganisms. In: Donalsdon, E.C. Microbial Enhancement of Oil Recovery—Recent Advances, Elservier, Amsterdam (1990)Google Scholar
  20. Kumar, M., Senden, T., Knackstedt, M., Lathan, S., Pinczewski, V., Sok, R., Sheppard, A., Turner, M.: Imaging of pore scale distribution of fluids and wettability, SCA2008-16. In: International Symposium of the Society of Core Analyst, Abu Dhabi, UAE 29 October–2 November (2008)Google Scholar
  21. Lin S.C., Sharma M., Georgiou G.: Production and deactivation of biosurfactant by Bacillus licheniformis JF-2, ACS. Biotechnol. Prog. 9, 138–145 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lin S.C., Minton M.A., Sharma M.M., Georgiou G.: structural and immunological characterization of a biosurfactant produced by Bacillus-licheniformis JF-2. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60(1), 31–38 (1994a)Google Scholar
  23. Lin S.C., Carswell K.S., Sharma M.M., Georgiou G.: Continuous production of the lipopeptide biosurfactant of Bacillus-licheniformis JF-2. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 41(3), 281–285 (1994b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Man H.N., Jing X.D.: Network modeling of mixed-wettability on electrical resistivity, capillary pressure and wettability indices. J. Petroleum Sci. Eng. 33, 101–122 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marmur A.: Solid-surface characterization by wetting. Ann. Rev. Mater. Res. 39, 473–489 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mu B., Wu Z., Chen Z.,Wang X., Ni F., Zhou J. (2002) Wetting behavior on quortz surfaces by the microbial metabolism and metabolic products. In: Paper Presented as the 7th International Symposium on Wettability and its Effects on Oil Recovery. Tasmania, Australia, March 12–14Google Scholar
  27. Morrow N.R., Mason G.: Recovery of oil by spontaneous imbibition. Current Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 6, 321–337 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Motealleh S., Ashouripashaki M., DiCarlo D., Bryant S.: Mechanisms of capillary-controlled immiscible fluid flow in fractionally wet porous media. Vadose Zone J. 9, 610–623 (2010). doi:10.2136/vzj2009.0059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Payatakes A.C., Ng K.M., Flummerfelt R.W.: Oil ganglia dynamics during immiscible displacement model formulation. AIChE J. 26, 430–442 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Polson, J., Buckman, J., Bowne, D., Todd, A., Gow, M., Cuthbert, S.: An Environmental-scanning-electron-microscope investigation into the effect of biofilm and the wettability of quartz, SPE 114421. Soc. Pet. J. 15, 223–227 (2010)Google Scholar
  31. Porter M.L., Schaap M.G., Wildenschild D.: Lattice–Boltzmann simulations of the capillary pressure-saturation-interfacial area relationship of porous media. Adv. Water Resour. 32(11), 1632–1640 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Porter M.L., Wildenschild D.: Image analysis algorithms for estimating porous media multiphase flow variables for computed microtomography data: a validation study. Comput. Geosci. 14(1), 15–30 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Porter M.L., Wildenschild D., Grant G., Gerhard J.I.: Measurement and prediction of the relationship between capillary pressure, saturation, and interfacial area in a NAPL-water-glass bead system. Water Resour. Res. 46, W08512 (2010). doi:10.1029/2009WR007786 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Salatheil, R.A.: Oil Recovery by Surface Film Drainage in Mixed-Wettability Rocks. JPT (Oct 1973) 1216–1224; Trans., AIME, p. 255Google Scholar
  35. Schnaar G., Brusseau M.L.: Characterizing pore-scale configuration of organic immiscible liquid in multiphase systems with synchrotron x-ray microtomography. Vadose Zone J. 5, 641–648 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sheppard A., Sok R., Averdunk H.: Techniques for image enhancement and segmentation of tomographic images of porous media. Phys. A 339, 145–151 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Soudmand-asli A., Ayatollahi S.S., Mohabatkar H., Zareie M., Shariatpanahi S.F.: The in situ microbial enhanced oil recovery in fractured porous media. J. Petroleum Sci. Eng. 58(1–2), 161–172 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Suthar H., Hingurao K., Desai A., Nerurkar A.: Evaluation of bioemulsifier mediated Microbial Enhanced Oil recovery using sand pack column. J. Microbiol. Methods 75, 225–230 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Suthar H., Hingurao K., Desai A., Nerurkar A.: Selective plugging strategy based microbial enhanced oil recovery using Bacillus licheniformis TT33. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 19(10), 1230–1237 (2009)Google Scholar
  40. Tweheyo M.T., Holt T., Torsæter O.: An experimental study of the relationship between wettability and oil production characteristics. J. Petroleum Sci. Eng. 24, 179–188 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wardlaw N.C., McKellar M.: Oil blob populations and mobilization of trapped oil in unconsolidated packs. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 63, 525–532 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wildenschild D., Hopmans J.W., Vaz C.M.P., Rivers M.L., Rikard D., Christensen B.S.B.: Using x-ray computed tomography in hydrology: Systems, resolutions and limitations. J. Hydrol. 267, 285–297 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yakimov M.M., Amro M.M., Bock M., Boseker K., Fredrickson H.L., Kessel D.G., Timmis K.N.: The potential of Bacillus licheniformis strains for in situ enhanced oil recovery. J. Petroleum Sci. Eng. 18(1–2), 147–160 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Youssef, N., Elshahed, M.S., McInerney, M.J.: Microbial processes in oil fields: culprits, problems, and opportunities. In: Advances in Applied Microbiology, vol. 66, pp. 141–251. Elsevier, San Diego (2009)Google Scholar
  45. Zhao X., Blunt M., Yao J.: Pore-scale modeling: effects of wettability on waterflood oil recovery. J. Petroleum Sci. Eng. 71, 169–178 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental EngineeringOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations