Skip to main content
Log in

MINOCA presenting with STEMI: incidence, aetiology and outcome in a contemporaneous cohort

  • Published:
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Historical data indicate that approximately 10% of acute coronary syndrome patients have no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) but contemporary incidence of non-obstructed coronary arteries in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is not clear. We aimed both to identify the contemporary incidence of MI without obstructive CAD (MINOCA)—using the ESC definition—and assess clinical outcomes. We assessed consecutive unselected STEMI patients presenting to the cardiac catheterisation laboratory with a view to undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). MINOCA was defined according to ESC criteria. Electronic patient records, blood results, angiographic and echocardiographic data were interrogated to determine final diagnosis, as well as 30-day and 1-year mortality rate. Of 2521 patients with full electronic dataset, 2158 (85.6%) underwent PPCI for obstructive CAD (angiographic stenosis > 70%). A further 167 (6.6%) with obstructive CAD were treated medically or surgically. The remaining 196 (7.8%) patients had absence of obstructive CAD at angiography, of whom 167 had no stenosis (< 30%) and 29 had mild coronary atheroma (stenosis > 30% but < 50%). A total of 110 (4.4%) patients met diagnostic criteria for MINOCA. All-cause mortality at 30-days and 1-year were 3.6% and 4.5%, respectively. In our cohort, 1 in 20 patients presenting with STEMI had MINOCA. This is the first description of the relatively high incidence of MINOCA in a STEMI cohort using current ESC definition and diagnostic criteria and could help power future trials in this area. Mortality rate was relatively high in our study and similar to that in large meta-analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DeWood MA, Spores J, Notske R et al (1980) Prevalence of total coronary occlusion during the early hours of transmural myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 303:897–902

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. DeWood MA, Stifter WF, Simpson CS et al (1986) Coronary arteriographic findings soon after non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 315:417–423

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S et al (2017) 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 39:119–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pasupathy S, Air T, Dreyer RP et al (2015) Systematic review of patients presenting with suspected myocardial infarction and nonobstructive coronary arteries. Circulation 131:861–870

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Agewall S, Beltrame JF, Reynolds HR et al (2016) ESC working group position paper on myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries. Eur Heart J 38:143–153. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gehrie ER, Reynolds HR, Chen AY et al (2009) Characterization and outcomes of women and men with non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and nonobstructive coronary artery disease: results from the Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes with Early. Am Heart J 158:688–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Larsen AI, Galbraith PD, Ghali WA et al (2005) Characteristics and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction and angiographically normal coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 95:261–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lindahl B, Baron T, Erlinge D et al (2017) Medical therapy for secondary prevention and long-term outcome in patients with myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary artery disease clinical perspective. Circulation 135:1481–1489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghadri J-R, Wittstein IS, Prasad A et al (2018) International expert consensus document on Takotsubo syndrome (part I): clinical characteristics, diagnostic criteria, and pathophysiology. Eur Heart J 39:2032–2046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS et al (2018) Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 40:237–269. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghadri J-R, Wittstein IS, Prasad A et al (2018) International expert consensus document on Takotsubo syndrome (part II): diagnostic workup, outcome, and management. Eur Heart J 39:2047–2062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Prasad A, Dangas G, Srinivasan M et al (2014) Incidence and angiographic characteristics of patients With apical ballooning syndrome (takotsubo/stress cardiomyopathy) in the HORIZONS-AMI trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 83:343–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Widimsky P, Stellova B, Groch L et al (2006) Prevalence of normal coronary angiography in the acute phase of suspected ST-elevation myocardial infarction: experience from the PRAGUE studies. Can J Cardiol 22:1147–1152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Templin C, Ghadri JR, Diekmann J et al (2015) Clinical features and outcomes of Takotsubo (stress) cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 373:929–938

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ghadri JR, Kato K, Cammann VL et al (2018) Long-term prognosis of patients with Takotsubo syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 72:874–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hjort M, Lindahl B, Baron T, Jernberg T, Tornvall P, Eggers KM (2018) Prognosis in relation to high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T levels in patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries. Am Heart J 200:60–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bainey KR, Welsh RC, Alemayehu W, Westerhout CM, Traboulsi D, Anderson T, Brass N, Armstrong PW, Kaul P (2018) Population-level incidence and outcomes of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): insights from the Alberta contemporary acute coronary syndrome patients invasive treatment strategies (COAPT) study. Int J Cardiol 264:12–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tornvall P, Collste O, Ehrenborg E et al (2016) A case-control study of risk markers and mortality in Takotsubo stress cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 67:1931–1936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Reynolds HR, Srichai MB, Iqbal SN et al (2011) Mechanisms of myocardial infarction in women without angiographically obstructive coronary artery disease. Circulation 124:1414–1425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Niccoli G, Scalone G, Crea F (2015) Acute myocardial infarction with no obstructive coronary atherosclerosis: mechanisms and management. Eur Heart J 36:475–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ong P, Athanasiadis A, Hill S et al (2008) Coronary artery spasm as a frequent cause of acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:523–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Beltrame JF, Crea F, Kaski JC et al (2015) International standardization of diagnostic criteria for vasospastic angina. Eur Heart J 38:ehv351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Montone RA, Niccoli G, Fracassi F et al (2017) Patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries: safety and prognostic relevance of invasive coronary provocative tests. Eur Heart J 39:91–98

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kaski JC (2018) Provocative tests for coronary artery spasm in MINOCA: necessary and safe? Eur Heart J 39:99–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying X. Gue.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gue, Y.X., Corballis, N., Ryding, A. et al. MINOCA presenting with STEMI: incidence, aetiology and outcome in a contemporaneous cohort. J Thromb Thrombolysis 48, 533–538 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-019-01919-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-019-01919-5

Keywords

Navigation