On the performance of wireless sensor networks with QSSK modulation in the presence of co-channel interference
This paper proposes the use of quadrature space shift keying (QSSK) modulation for wireless sensor networks (WSNs). QSSK is a multiple input multiple output communication protocol that attracted substantial interest due to several promised inherent advantages. It has been shown in literature that QSSK scheme achieves high spectral efficiency with low average error probability, high energy efficiency, and very simple transmitter and receiver architectures. Hence, its use in WSNs is very promising to ameliorate the major limitations of such networks. The performance of a WSN with QSSK modulation and in the presence of co-channel interference is studied in this paper. A closed form expression for the average pair wise error probability is derived and used to obtain a tight upper bound on the overall average bit error ratio. Obtained results verified the superiority of QSSK scheme as compared to traditional modulation techniques especially for high spectral efficiency.
KeywordsWireless sensor networks MIMO Quadrature space shift keying (QSSK) Co-channel interference (CCI ) Performance analysis
This work is supported by North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), under the SPS Grant G4936 (Hybrid Sensor Network for Emergency Critical Scenarios).
- 1.Arampatzis, T., Lygeros, J., & Manesis, S. (2005). A survey of applications of wireless sensors and wireless sensor networks. In IEEE International symposium on, mediterrean conference on control and automation intelligent control.Google Scholar
- 3.Althunibat, S., Antonopoulos, A., Karatsakli, E., Granelli, F., & Verikoukis, C. (2016). Countering intelligent-dependent malicious nodes in target detection wireless sensor networks. IEEE Sensors Journal, 16(23), 8627–8639.Google Scholar
- 6.Polastre, J., Szewczyk, R., & Culler, D. (2005). Telos: Enabling ultra-low power wireless research. In Fourth International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, IPSN 2005 (pp. 364–369).Google Scholar
- 7.XBOW MICA2 Mote Specifications. http://www.xbow.com.
- 8.Yu, Y., Krishnamachari, B., & Prasanna, V. K. (2004). Energy-latency tradeoffs for data gathering in wireless sensor networks. IEEE INFOCOM, 2004. doi: 10.1109/INFCOM.2004.1354498.
- 9.Son, D., Krishnamachari, B., & Heidemann, J. (2006). Experimental study of concurrent transmission in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems. ACM.Google Scholar
- 11.Gao, S., Qian, L., & Vaman, D. R. (2008). Distributed energy efficient spectrum access in wireless cognitive radio sensor networks. In IEEE Wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC).Google Scholar
- 15.Kumar, S., Sharma, A., & Raghuvanshi, S. S. (2011). Energy efficient scheduling algorithm with interference reduction for wireless sensor networks. In International conference on computational intelligence and communication networks, Gwalior, (pp. 328–332).Google Scholar
- 16.Liang, S., Ge, Y., Jiang, S., & Tan, H. P. (2014). A lightweight and robust interference mitigation scheme for wireless body sensor networks in realistic environments. In IEEE Wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC), Istanbul, (pp. 1697–1702).Google Scholar
- 17.Razi, A., & Abedi, A. (2011). Interference reduction in Wireless Passive Sensor Networks using directional antennas. In 4th Annual caneus fly by wireless workshop, Montreal, QC (pp. 1–4).Google Scholar
- 25.Mesleh, R., Ikki, S. S., & Aggoune, H. M. (2017). Quadrature spatial modulation-performance analysis and impact of imperfect channel knowledge. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 28, e2905. doi: 10.1002/ett.2905.
- 28.Khalifeh, A., Al-Agtash, S., Tanash, R., & AlQudah, M., (2016). Deploying agents for monitoring and notification of wireless sensor networks. In 2016 IEEE 28th International conference on tools with artificial intelligence (ICTAI), San Jose, CA, (pp. 754–757).Google Scholar
- 31.Craig, J. W. (1991). A new, simple and exact result for calculating the probability of error for two-dimensional signal constellations. In MILCOM 91 - Conference record, McLean, VA, (vol. 2, pp. 571–575).Google Scholar
- 33.Proakis, J. G. (1995). Digital communications. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar