Advertisement

Synthese

, Volume 195, Issue 5, pp 1969–1991 | Cite as

The central executive system

  • Denis Buehler
Article Type S.I. : Neuroscience and Its Philosophy

Abstract

Executive functioning has been said to bear on a range of traditional philosophical topics, such as consciousness, thought, and action. Surprisingly, philosophers have not much engaged with the scientific literature on executive functioning. This lack of engagement may be due to several influential criticisms of that literature by Daniel Dennett, Alan Allport, and others. In this paper I argue that more recent research on executive functioning shows that these criticisms are no longer valid. The paper clears the way to a more fruitful philosophical engagement with findings on the central executive system.

Keywords

Executive functions Psychology Neuroscience Explanation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to Tyler Burge. Thanks also to Felipe De Brigard and other participants in a workshop at UNAM-IIF, Mexico City, August 2016. I am, finally, grateful for detailed feedback from Gualtiero Piccinini and two anonymous referees.

References

  1. Aizawa, K., & Gillett, C. (2011). The autonomy of psychology in the age of neuroscience. In P. Illari, F. Russo, & J. Williamson (Eds.), Causality in the sciences. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allport, A. (1993). Attention and control: Have we been asking the wrong questions? A critical review of twenty-five years. In D. E. Meyers & S. M. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 183–216). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Allport, A. (2011). Attention and integration. In C. Mole, D. Smithies, & W. Wu (Eds.), Attention. Philosophical and psychological essays (pp. 24–59). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Alvarez, G., & Cavanagh, P. (2004). The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects. Psychological Science, 15(2), 106–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, P. (2008). Towards a developmental model of executive function. In V. Anderson, R. Jacobs, & P. Anderson (Eds.), Executive functions and the frontal lobes. A lifespan perspective (pp. 3–22). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, R. Jacobs, & Anderson, P. (Eds.). (2008). Executive functions and the frontal lobes. A lifespan perspective (pp. 3–22). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  7. Ardila, A. (2016). Is ‘self-consciousness’ equivalent to ‘executive function’? Psychology & Neuroscience, 9(2), 215–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arffa, S. (2007). The relationship of intelligence to executive function and non-executive function measures in a sample of average, above average, and gifted youth. Archives of Clinical Psychology, 22(8), 969–978.Google Scholar
  9. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Baddeley, A. D. (1996). Exploring the central executive. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baddeley, A. D. (2007). Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review Psychology, 63, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bechtel, W. (2008). Mental mechanisms: Philosophical perspectives on cognitive neuroscience. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Block, N. (2013). Seeing and windows of integration. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy. doi: 10.1002/tht3.62.
  15. Block, N. (2015). The puzzle of perceptual precision. In J. Windt & T. Metzinger (Eds.), MIND anniversary collection. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  16. Block, N. (2016). The Anna Karenina principle and skepticism about unconscious perception. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 93(2), 452–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Block, N., & Phillips, I. (2016). Unconscious seeing. In B. Nanay (Ed.), Current controversies in philosophy of perception. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Brady, T., Konkle, T., Alvarez, G., & Oliva, A. (2008). Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 14325–14329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brady, T., Konkle, T., & Alvarez, G. (2011). A review of visual memory capacity: Beyond individual items and toward structured representations. Journal of Vision, 11, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Broadbent, D. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Buchsbaum, B., & D’Esposito, M. (2008). Short term and working memory systems. In H. Eichenbaum & J. Byrne (Eds.), Memory systems vol. 3, learning and memory: A comprehensive reference, 4 vols (pp. 237–260). Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Buehler, D. (2014). Psychological agency—Guidance of visual attention. UCLA Dissertation.Google Scholar
  23. Burge, T. (2010a). Origins of objectivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Burge, T. (2010b). Origins of perception. Disputatio, 4(29), 1–38.Google Scholar
  25. Burge, T. (2010c). Steps towards origins of propositional thought. Disputatio, 4(29), 39–67.Google Scholar
  26. Burge, T. (2010d). Modest dualism. In T. Burge (Ed.), Cognition through understanding. Self-knowledge, interlocution, reasoning, reflection. Philosophical essays (Vol. 3, pp. 471–488). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Butterfill, S., & Sinigaglia, C. (2012). Intention and motor representation in purposive action. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 88(1), 119–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Carruthers, P. (2015). The centered mind. What the science of working memory shows us about the nature of human thought. Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Clark, A. (2009). On executive attention. Association for the Study of Consciousness. http://www.theassc.org/files/assc/2586.pdf.
  30. Clark, K., Noudoost, B., Schafer, R., & Moore, T. (2014). Neural mechanisms of attentional control: Frontal cortex. In A. Nobre & S. Kastner (Eds.), The oxford handbook of attention (pp. 375–398). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Conway, A., Jarrold, C., Kane, M., Miyake, A., & Towse, J. (Eds.). (2007). Variation in working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. Oxford psychology series (Vol. 26). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Cowan, N. (2005). Working memory capacity. New York: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Craver, C. (2007). Explaining the brain. Mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Dennett, D. (1978). Brainstorms: Philosophical essays on mind and psychology. Montgomery, VT: Bradford Books.Google Scholar
  36. Dennett, D. (1994). Consciousness explained. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
  37. Dennett, D. (2005). Sweet dreams: Philosophical obstacles to a science of consciousness (Jean Nicod lectures). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  38. Duque, J., Labrua, L., Verset, S., Olivier, E., & Ivry, R. (2012). Dissociating the role of prefrontal and premotor cortices in controlling inhibitory mechanisms during motor preparation. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 806–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Duque, J., Olivier, E., & Rushworth, M. (2013). Top-down inhibitory control exerted by the media frontal cortex during action selection under conflict. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(10), 1634–1648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Firestone, C., & Scholl, B. (2016). Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for ‘top-down’ effects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, 1–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fockert, J., & Bremner, A. (2011). Release of inattentional blindness by high working memory load: Elucidating the relationship between working memory and selective attention. Cognition, 121, 400–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  43. Fodor, J. (2001). The mind doesn’t work that way. The scope and limits of computational psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  44. Fougnie, D. (2009). The relationship between attention and working memory. In N. B. Johansen (Ed.), New research on short-term memory (pp. 1–45). New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  45. Friedman, N., & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(1), 101–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Friedman, N., Miyake, A., Corley, R., Young, S., Defries, J., & Hewitt, J. (2006). Not all executive functions are related to intelligence. Psychological science, 17, 172–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Frisby, J., & Stone, J. (2010). Seeing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  48. Funahashi, S. (2007). The general-purpose working memory system and functions of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. In N. Osaka, R. Logie, & M. D’Esposito (Eds.), The cognitive neuroscience of working memory (pp. 213–230). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Fuster, J. (2015). The prefrontal cortex. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  50. Gazzaley, A. & D’Esposito, M. (2006). Unifying the prefrontal cortex: Executive control, neural networks, and top-down modulation. In B. Miller & J. Cummings (Eds.), The human frontal lobes. Functions and disorders (pp. 187–207). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  51. Gazzaley, A., & D’Esposito, M. (2007). Top-down modulation in visual working memory. In N. Osaka, R. Logie, & M. D’Esposito (Eds.), The cognitive neuroscience of working memory (pp. 197–212). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Goldman-Rakic, P. (1987). Circuitry of primate prefrontal cortex and regulation of behavior by representational memory. In F. Plum (Ed.), Handbook of phyiology—The nervous system (Vol. 5, pp. 373–417). Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society.Google Scholar
  53. Gottlieb, J. (2007). From thought to action: The parietal cortex as a bridge between perception, action, and cognition. Neuron, 53, 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Gottlieb, J. (2014). Neural mechanisms of attentional control: Parietal cortex. In A. Nobre & S. Kastner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of attention (pp. 346–374). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Inzlicht, M., & Schmeichel, B. (2012). What is ego depletion? Toward a mechanistic revision of the resource model of self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(5), 450–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Jurado, M., & Roselli, M. (2007). The elusive nature of executive functions: A review of our current understanding. Neuropsychological Review, 17, 213–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  58. Kane, M., Bleckley, M., Conway, A., & Engle, R. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 169–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kurzban, R., Duckworth, A., Kable, J., & Myers, J. (2013). An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(6), 661–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lavie, N., & Dalton, P. (2014). Load theory of attention and cognitive control. In A. Nobre & S. Kastner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of attention (pp. 56–75). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Machamer, E., Darden, L., & Craver, C. (2000). Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 67(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  63. Miller, E., & Cohen, J. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Miller, B., & D’Esposito, M. (2005). Searching for “the top” in top-down control. Neuron, 48, 535–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1), 8–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (Eds.). (1999). Models of working memory. Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Miyake, A., Friedman, N., Emerson, M., Witzki, A., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Miyake, A., Friedman, N., Rettinger, D., Shah, P., & Hegarty, M. (2001). How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 130(4), 621–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Mole, C. (2010). Attention as cognitive unison: An essay in philosophical psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Monsell, S., & Driver, J. (2000). Banishing the control homunculus. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance (Vol. XVIII, pp. 3–32). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  71. Munakata, Y., Herd, S., Chatham, C., Depue, B., Banich, M., & O’Reilly, R. (2011). A unified framework for inhibitory control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(10), 453–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Munakata, Y., Snyder, H., & Chatham, C. (2012). Developing cognitive control: Three key transitions. Current Directions in the Psychological Sciences, 21(2), 71–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Neubert, F., Mars, R., Buch, E., Olivier, E., & Rushworth, M. (2010). Cortical and subcortical interactions during action reprogramming and their related white matter pathways. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 107, 13240–13245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Norman, D., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research (Vol. IV, pp. 1–18). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  75. O’Reilly, R. (2006). Biologically based computational models of high-level cognition. Science, 314, 91–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Palmer, S. (1999). Vision science. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  77. Passingham, R., & Wise, S. (2012). The neurobiology of the prefrontal cortex: Anatomy, evolution, and the origin of insight. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Phillips, I. (2016). Consciousness and criterion: On Block’s case for unconscious perception. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 93(2), 419–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Piccinini, G., & Craver, C. (2011). Integrating psychology and neuroscience: Functional analyses as mechanism sketches. Synthese, 183(3), 283–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Rabbitt, P. (Ed.). (1997). Methodology of frontal and executive function. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  81. Reis, J., et al. (2007). Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the understanding of cortical mechanisms involved in motor control. Journal of Physiology, 586, 325–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Reynolds, J., Braver, T., Brown, J., & Van der Stigchel, S. (2006). Computational and neural mechanisms of task switching. Neurocomputing, 69, 1332–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Richland, L., & Burchinal, M. (2013). Early executive function predicts reasoning development. Psychological science, 24(1), 87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Rumelhart, D., Hinton, G. & McClelland, J. (1986). A framework for parallel distributed processing. In Rumelhart, D., McClelland, J., & the PDP research group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol I). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  85. Shea, N. (2015). Distinguishing top-down from bottom-up effects. In D. Biggs, M. Matthen, & S. Stokes (Eds.), Perception and its Modalities. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  86. Shiffrin, R., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic information processing: II. Perception, learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Soto, D., Mäntylä, T., & Silvanto, J. (2011). Working memory without consciousness. Current Biology, 21(22), 912–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Soto, D., & Silvanto, J. (2014). Reappraising the relationship between working memory and conscious awareness. Trends in Cognitive Science. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.06.005.
  89. Stanovich, K. (2010). Rationality and the reflective mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Stanovich, K., & West, R. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and brain sciences, 23, 645–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Stinson, C. (2009). Searching for the source of executive attention. Psyche, 15, 137–154.Google Scholar
  92. Stinson, C. (2016). Mechanisms in psychology: Ripping nature at its seams. Synthese, 193, 1585–1614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Stokes, M., & Duncan, J. (2014). Dynamic brain states for preparatory attention and working memory. In K. Nobre & S. Kastner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of attention. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  94. Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: APA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Watzl, S. (2017). Structuring mind: The nature of attention and how it shapes consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Weiskopf, D. (2011). Models and mechanisms in psychological explanation. Synthese, 183(3), 313–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Weiskopf, D. (2016). Integrative modeling and the role of neural constraints. Philosophy of Science, 83(5), 674–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Weiskopf, D. (2017). The explanatory autonomy of cognitive models. In M. Kaplan (Ed.), Integrating psychology and neuroscience: Prospects and problems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  99. Wu, W. (2014). Attention. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  100. Zaitchik, D., Iqbal, Y., & Carey, S. (2014). The effect of executive function on biological reasoning in young children: An individual differences study. Child Development, 85(1), 160–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Zelazo, P., Carter, A., Reznick, S., & Frye, E. (1997). Early development of executive function: A problem-solving framework. Review of General Psychology, 1(2), 198–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Antwerp, Center for Philosophical PsychologyAntwerpBelgium

Personalised recommendations