Skip to main content
Log in

General Extensional Mereology is Finitely Axiomatizable

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mereology is the theory of the relation “being a part of”. The first exact formulation of mereology is due to the Polish logician Stanisław Leśniewski. But Leśniewski’s mereology is not first-order axiomatizable, for it requires every subset of the domain to have a fusion. In recent literature, a first-order theory named General Extensional Mereology (GEM) can be thought of as a first-order approximation of Leśniewski’s theory, in the sense that GEM guarantees that every definable subset of the domain has a fusion, and this has been achieved by positing an axiom schema which in effect defines infinitely many axioms. Intuitively, in order to range over every definable subset, such an axiom schema seems unavoidable. But this paper will show that GEM is finitely axiomatizable and that all we need are just finitely many instances of the said axiom schema.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Casati, R., and A. Varzi, Parts and Places, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hendry, H.E., Complete Extensions of the Calculus of Individuals, Noûs 16:453–460, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hodges, W., Model Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Niebergall, K.G., Mereology, in L. Horsten, and R. Pettigrew (eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Philosophical Logic, Bloomsbury Academic, London, 2014, pp. 271–298.

  5. Pietruszczak, A., Classical Mereology Is Not Elementarily Axiomatizable, Logic and Logical Philosophy 24:485–498, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Simons, P., Parts: A Study in Ontology, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1987.

  7. Tsai, H., Decidability of Mereological Thoeries, Logic and Logical Philosophy 18:45–63, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsai, H., Decidability of General Extensional Mereology, Studia Logica 101:619–636, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tsai, H., Notes on Models of First-Order Mereological Theories, Logic and Logical Philosophy 24:469–482, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tsai, H., and A.C. Varzi, Atoms, Gunk and the Limits of ‘Composition’, Erkenntnis 81:231–235, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is a product of a research project (104-2410-H-194 -098 -MY3) funded by Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hsing-chien Tsai.

Additional information

Presented by Richmond Thomason

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsai, Hc. General Extensional Mereology is Finitely Axiomatizable. Stud Logica 106, 809–826 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-017-9768-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-017-9768-2

Keywords

Navigation