Molecular recognition of cyclodecapeptides to ibuprofen and naproxen enantiomers: a theoretical study
- 253 Downloads
Cyclopeptide derivatives have attracted great interest in host-guest chemistry during the past decades. In this work, four cyclopeptides including one cyclodecapeptide (CDP) and three modified CDPs (M-CDP involves I-CDP, E-CDP, and H-CDP) are adopted as hosts to differentiate the four guests of the amphetamine (AP) and ibuprofen (IP) enantiomers using a proposed integrated computation protocol. The obtained results demonstrated that the guests of AP and IP enantiomers could be recognized by different cyclopeptides using the certain optimized quantum chemistry methods. Specifically, the AP or IP enantiomers might be identified by the corresponding cyclopepitdes in the five pairs of the inclusion complexes associated with the large differences of binding energies of hosts with guests, that is, the two of H-CDP/AP and H-CDP/IP by B3LYP, the two of I-CDP/IP and H-CDP/IP by CAM-B3LYP, and the other one of I-CDP/IP by M06-2X, which are mainly determined by their corresponding stable conformations, electronic properties, and favorable interactions. The intermolecular hydrogen bonds and NBO analyses of the inclusion complexes further suggest the corresponding differences of binding energies. The visual nonbonded weak interactions for the studied systems gave the reasons why the AP and IP enantiomers are identified by the corresponding cyclopeptides. Molecular dynamics simulated results further support the above conclusions. The investigation provides detailed information at a molecular level about the recognition of the two chiral drug molecules by the four cyclodecapeptides. The integrated computation protocol proposed in this work provides people a feasible way to study interaction of hosts and guests, molecular recognition, and chiral separation.
KeywordsMolecular recognition Cyclodecapeptide Ibuprofen Naproxen Host-guest Inclusion
This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21001095 and J1210060), University Key Research Programs of Department of Education in Henan Province (No. 15A150082 and 14A150033), and Undergraduate Innovative Training Program of Zhengzhou University (2016xjxm264).
- 4.Chen H, Ogo S, Fish RH (1996) Bioorganometallic chemistry. 8. The molecular recognition of aromatic and aliphatic amino acids and substituted aromatic and aliphatic carboxylic acid guests with Supramolecular (η5-Pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)rhodium−Nucleobase, nucleoside, and nucleotide cyclic Trimer hosts via non-covalent π−π and hydrophobic interactions in water: steric, electronic, and conformational parameters. J Am Chem Soc 118:4993–5001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Bikádi Z, Iványi R, Szente L, Ilisz I (2007) Hazai E. Cyclodextrin complexes: Chiral recognition and complexation behaviour Curr Drug Discov Technol 4:282–294Google Scholar
- 9.Cai W, Sun T, Liu P, Chipot C, Shao X (2009) Inclusion mechanism of steroid drugs into β-cyclodextrins. Insights from Free Energy Calculations J Phys Chem B 113:7836–7843Google Scholar
- 55.Zhao Y, Truhlar DG (2008) The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals. Theor Chem Account 120:215–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 57.Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Mennucci B, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Caricato M, Li X, Hratchian HP, Izmaylov AF, Bloino J, Zheng G, Sonnenberg JL, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Vreven T, Peralta JE, Ogliaro F, Bearpark M, Heyd JJ, Brothers E, Kudin KN, Staroverov VN, Keith T, Kobayashi R, Normand J, Raghavachari K, Rendell A, Burant JC, Iyengar SS, Tomasi MC, Rega JMM, Klene M, Knox JE, Cross JB, Bakken CA, Jaramillo, Gomperts R, Stratmann OY, Austin R, Cammi CP, Ochterski RLM, Morokuma VGZ, Voth GA, P Salvador JJD, Dapprich S, Daniels AD, Farkas O, Foresman JB, Ortiz JV, Cioslowski J, Fox DJ. (2010) Gaussian 09, Revision C.01. Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford.Google Scholar
- 59.Trott O, Olson AJ (2010) AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem 31:455–461Google Scholar
- 67.Case DA, Babin V, Berryman JT, Betz RM, Cai Q, Cerutti DS, Cheatham TE, Darden TA, Duke RE, Gohlke H, et al (2014) AMBER 14. University of California, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar