Advertisement

Strength of Materials

, Volume 50, Issue 1, pp 157–165 | Cite as

Numerical Simulation-Based Optimization of Contact Stress Distribution and Lubrication Conditions in the Straight Worm Drive

  • Y. He
  • G. F. Li
  • Y. P. Zhao
  • Y. Sun
  • G. Z. Jiang
Article
  • 31 Downloads

Tooth contact area optimization/meshing of the straight worm pair is vital for improving its operation efficiency. Geometric parameters of a worm helicoid were derived via the gear meshing theory using the equations of the instantaneous contact line. The visualization function and powerful computing capability of MATLAB are used for the numerical analysis where the instantaneous contact line distribution is simulated for particular worm drive parameters, which yields the induced curvature and slip angle in the direction of the line. The above results are used for further optimization of the meshing performance of the straight worm gear and identification of its influencing factors. A case study of the particular cylindrical worm gear in compliance with the GB 10085-1988 Standard of China demonstrate that a reasonable selection of worm gear parameters can extend the contact line and the working range of the tooth surface of the worm gear and/or make the contact line distribution along the worm wheel more uniform, thus improving the local meshing performance.

Keywords

straight worm drive meshing performance instantaneous contact line helix angle MATLAB 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research work in this paper was fully supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 51475083.

References

  1. 1.
    L. V. Mohan and M. S. Shunmugam, “Geometrical aspects of double enveloping worm gear drive,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 44, No. 11, 2053–2065 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Y. P. Zhao and Z. Zhao, “Computer aided analysis on the meshing behavior of a height-modified dual-torus double-enveloping toroidal worm drive,” Comput. Aided Design, 42, No. 12, 1232–1240 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. I. Medvedev, A. E. Volkov, M. A. Volosova, and O. E. Zubelevich, “Mathematical model and algorithm for contact stress analysis of gears with multi-pair contact,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 86, 156–171 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    W. K. Jehng, “Computer solid modeling technologies applied to develop and form mathematical parametric tooth profiles of bevel gear and skew gear sets,” J. Mater. Process. Tech., 122, Nos. 2–3, 160–172 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Y. P. Zhao, J. Y. Kong, G. F. Li, et al., “Computerized simulation of tooth contact and error sensitivity investigation for ease-off hourglass worm drives,” Comput. Aided Design, 44, No. 8, 778–790 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Brauer, “Transmission error in anti-backlash conical involute gear transmissions: a global-local FE approach,” Finite Elem. Anal. Des., 41, No. 5, 431–457 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Strzelecki and Z. Towarek, “The effect of shaft unbalance on the operation of worm gear rolling bearings,” Int. J. COMADEM, 13, No. 3, 2–9 (2010).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. P. Zhao, J. Y. Kong, G. F. Li, and T. C. Wu, “Tooth flank modification theory of dual-torus double-enveloping hourglass worm drives,” Comput. Aided Design, 43, No. 12, 1535–1544 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. F. Li, J. Liu, G. Z. Jiang, and H. H. Liu, “Numerical simulation of temperature field and thermal stress field in the new type of ladle with the nanometer adiabatic material,” Adv. Mech. Eng., 7, No. 4, 1–13 (2015).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. V. Stolyarov, “Differential geometry of distributions,” J. Math. Sci., 207, No. 4, 635–657 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. Lewiner, J. D. Gomes, H. Lopes Jr, et al., “Curvature and torsion estimators based on parametric curve fitting,” Comp. Graph., 29, No. 5, 641–655 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. M. Vereshchaka, A. V. Deineka, and V. V. Danil’tsev, “Stress state of sealing ring of composite material with the specified physical and mechanical characteristics,” Strength Mater., 48, No. 3, 371–374 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. F. Li, P. X. Qu, J. Y. Kong, et al., “Influence of working lining parameters on temperature and stress field of ladle,” Appl. Math. Inform. Sci., 7, No. 2, 439–448 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Y. P. Zhao, D. Z. Su, and Z. Zhang, “Meshing analysis and technological parameters selection of dual tori double-enveloping toroidal worm drive,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 45, No. 9, 1269–1285 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Skrochocki and J. Tomczak, “Numerical simulation of rotary compression process of hollow balls,” Strength Mater., 48, No. 4, 583–591 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. He
    • 1
  • G. F. Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Y. P. Zhao
    • 3
  • Y. Sun
    • 1
    • 2
  • G. Z. Jiang
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.The Key Laboratory of Metallurgical Equipment and Control of Ministry of EducationWuhan University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina
  2. 2.Hubei Key Laboratory of Mechanical, Transmission and Manufacturing EngineeringWuhan University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina
  3. 3.School of Machinery and AutomationNortheastern UniversityShenyangChina

Personalised recommendations