Skip to main content
Log in

FEM Analysis and Experimental Study on the Bending Strength of Ceramic Tiles with the Top- and Back-Sided Polyurea Coating

  • SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL SECTION
  • Published:
Strength of Materials Aims and scope

Mechanical properties enhancement of ceramic tiles by a simple coating technique using polyurea was investigated. Solventless polyurea coatings were employed. The effect of coating sides of the ceramic substrate and film thickness on the mechanical properties were examined in three-point bend tests. The back-coated ceramic tile demonstrated a significant improvement in bending strength (by 25–50%) as compared to the top-coated one. The stress distribution in the substrate was analyzed by the finite element method, and the mechanism of improving mechanical properties was discussed. Based on FEM analysis, the polyurea back-coating appeared to be more effective as regards the stress distribution. The stress distribution in the back-coated ceramic tile is more uniform due to the cushioning effect of the supporting pins. The mechanism of the polyurea coating effect was evaluated in the experiment and finite element analysis. It was established that the stress distribution due to the polyurea coating was of importance for the improvement of the bending strength of substrates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K.-F. Torges and D. J. Primeaux II, “Cast polyurea elastomers, application, processing and performance,” in: UTECH’94, Paper 42, Netherlands Congress Center, Den Hague (1994), pp. 1–8.

  2. D. J. Primeaux II, Polyurea Elastomer Technology: History, Chemistry & Basic Formulating Techniques, Primeaux Associates LLC, Texas (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. A. Tracton, Coating Technology Handbook, Third edition, CRC Press, New York, (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  4. O. Rijensky and D. Rittel, “Polyurea coated aluminum plates under hydrodynamic loading: Does side matter?” Int. J. Impact Eng., 98, 1–12 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. K. Ackland, C. Anderson, and T. D. Ngo, “Deformation of polyurea-coated steel plates under localised blast loading,” Int. J. Impact Eng., 51, 13–22 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. N. Gardner, E. Wang, P. Kumar, and A. Shukla, “Blast mitigation in a sandwich composite using graded core and polyurea interlayer,” Exp. Mech., 52, 119–133 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. G. Wang, H. Q. Ren, X. Y. Wu, and C. L. Cai, “Effect of polyurea reinforced masonry walls for blast loads,” in: Advances in Energy, Environment and Materials Science: Proc. of the 2nd Int. Conf. on Energy, Environment and Materials Science (EEMS 2016, July 29–31, 2016, Singapore), CRC Press, New York (2016), pp. 331–338.

  8. ASTM C1161-13. Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Advanced Ceramics at Ambient Temperature, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2013).

  9. F. Hafeez and M. Arif, Engineering Practical Book Vol-II: Basic Mechanics and Science of Materials, eBooks2go Inc. (2011).

  10. R. W. Davidge, Mechanical Behaviour of Ceramics, Cambridge, New York (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. N. Greaves, A. L. Greer, R. S. Lakes, and T. Rouxel, “Poisson’s ratio and modern materials,” Nat. Mater., 10, 823–837 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. V. Orlov, “Computer simulation of optimal thickness of polyurea coating using for trenchless renovation of potable water pipes,” Procedia Engineer., 165, 1168–1175 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. http://www.digitaleng.news/de/simplifying-fea-models-plane-stress-and-plane-strain/

  14. E. C. Teixeira, J. R. Piascik, B. R. Stoner, and J. Y. Thompson, “Effect of YSZ thin film coating thickness on the strength of a ceramic substrate,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 83B, 459–463 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. D. Gross and T. Seelig, Fracture Mechanics: With an Introduction to Micromechanics, Chapter 2, Springer, Berlin (2011).

  16. I. N. Koukoulis, C. G. Provatidis, and S. Georgiou, “Finite element modelling of the mechanical effects of the UV laser ablation of polymer coatings,” J. Appl. Surf. Sci., 254, 3531–3539 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Ahmad, Handbook of Optomechanical Engineering, CRC Press, New York (1996).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. R. L. Norton, Machine Design: An Integrated Approach, Pearson Prentice Hall, New York (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. W. Freiman and J. J. Mecholsky, Jr., The Fracture of Brittle Materials Testing and Analysis, John Willy & Sons, New Jersey (2012).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Kamonchaivanich.

Additional information

Translated from Problemy Prochnosti, No. 5, pp. 5 – 13, September – October, 2018.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamonchaivanich, K., Kuboyama, K. & Ougizawa, T. FEM Analysis and Experimental Study on the Bending Strength of Ceramic Tiles with the Top- and Back-Sided Polyurea Coating. Strength Mater 50, 687–694 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-018-0013-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-018-0013-7

Keywords

Navigation