Polygenic scores for educational attainment and related variables, such as IQ and “mathematical ability” are now readily available via direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies. Some researchers are even proposing the use of genetic tests in educational settings via “precision education,” in which individualized student education plans would be tailored to polygenic scores. The potential psychosocial impacts of polygenic scores for traits and outcomes relevant to education, however, have not been assessed. In online experiments, we asked participants to imagine hypothetical situations in which they or their classmates had recently received polygenic scores for educational attainment. Participants prompted to answer multi-choice questions as though they had received their own low-percentile score, compared to a control condition, scored significantly lower on measures of self-esteem and of self-perceived competence, academic efficacy, and educational potential. Similarly, those asked to evaluate a hypothetical classmate as though the classmate had received a low-percentile score attributed significantly lower academic efficacy and educational potential, compared to a control condition. Through possible mechanisms of stigma and self-fulfilling prophecies, our results highlight the potential psychosocial harms of exposure to low-percentile polygenic scores for educational attainment.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Data will be made available to qualified researchers upon request.
SPSS syntax will be made available to qualified researchers upon request.
Allyse, M. A., Robinson, D. H., Ferber, M. J., & Sharp, R. R. (2018). Direct-to-consumer testing 2.0: Emerging models of direct-to-consumer genetic testing. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 93(1), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.11.001.
Asbury, K., & Plomin, R. (2014). G is for genes: The impact of genetics on education and achievement. . New York: Wiley.
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2622.214.171.1243.
Belsky, D. W., Domingue, B. W., Wedow, R., Arseneault, L., Boardman, J. D., Caspi, A., Conley, D., Fletcher, J. M., Freese, J., Herd, P., Moffitt, T. E., Poulton, R., Sicinski, K., Wertz, J., & Harris, K. M. (2018). Genetic analysis of social-class mobility in five longitudinal studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1801238115.
Berg, J. J., Harpak, A., Sinnott-Armstrong, N., Joergensen, A. M., Mostafavi, H., Field, Y., Boyle, E. A., Zhang, X., Racimo, F., Pritchard, J. K., & Coop, G. (2019). Reduced signal for polygenic adaptation of height in UK Biobank. eLife, 8, e39725. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39725.
Briley, D. A., & Tucker-Drob, E. (2019). What do the genetics of education tell us about learning? BOLD. https://bold.expert/what-do-the-genetics-of-education-tell-us-about-learning/.
Bulik-Sullivan, B. K., Loh, P.-R., Finucane, H. K., Ripke, S., Yang, J., Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Schizophrenia, P. N., Daly, M. J., Price, A. L., & Neale, B. M. (2015). LD Score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies. Nature Genetics, 47(3), 291–295. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3211.
Chan, Y., Holmen, O. L., Dauber, A., Vatten, L., Havulinna, A. S., Skorpen, F., et al. (2011). Common variants show predicted polygenic effects on height in the tails of the distribution, except in extremely short individuals. PLoS Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002439.
Chen, H., Gu, X., Zhou, Y., Ge, Z., Wang, B., Siok, W. T., Wang, G., Huen, M., Jiang, Y., Tan, L.-H., & Sun, Y. (2017). A genome-wide association study identifies genetic variants associated with mathematics ability. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40365.
Cust, A. E., Drummond, M., Kanetsky, P. A., Mann, G. J., Cust, A. E., Schmid, H., Hopper, J. L., Aitken, J. F., Armstrong, B. K., Giles, G. G., Holland, E., Kefford, R. F., Jenkins, M. A., Newton Bishop, J. A., Affleck, P., Barrett, J. H., Bishop, D. T., Harrison, J., Iles, M. M., & Bishop, D. T. (2018). Assessing the incremental contribution of common genomic variants to melanoma risk prediction in two population-based studies. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 138(12), 2617–2624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2018.05.023.
Dai, Z., Long, N., & Huang, W. (2019). Influence of genetic interactions on polygenic prediction. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/667162.
Dar-Nimrod, I., Cheung, B. Y., Ruby, M. B., & Heine, S. J. (2014). Can merely learning about obesity genes affect eating behavior? Appetite, 81, 269–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.06.109.
Dar-Nimrod, I., & Heine, S. J. (2011). Genetic essentialism: On the deceptive determinism of DNA. Psychological Bulletin, 137(5), 800–818. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021860.
Dar-Nimrod, I., Zuckerman, M., & Duberstein, P. R. (2013). The effects of learning about one’s own genetic susceptibility to alcoholism: A randomized experiment. Genetics in Medicine, 15(2), 132–138. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2012.111.
Davidson, J. E., & Downing, C. L. (2000). Contemporary models of intelligence. In Handbook of intelligence (pp. 34–50). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807947.004.
Deary, I. J., Strand, S., Smith, P., & Fernandes, C. (2007). Intelligence and educational achievement. Intelligence, 35(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2006.02.001.
Duncan, L., Shen, H., Gelaye, B., Meijsen, J., Ressler, K., Feldman, M., Peterson, R., & Domingue, B. (2019). Analysis of polygenic risk score usage and performance in diverse human populations. Nature Communications, 10(1), 3328. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11112-0.
Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. . London: Psychology Press.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. . New York: Random House.
Erbeli, F. (2019). Translating research findings in genetics of learning disabilities to special education instruction. Mind, Brain, and Education, 13(2), 74–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12196.
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005.
Folkersen, L., Pain, O., Ingason, A., Werge, T., Lewis, C. M., & Austin, J. (2020). Impute.me: An open-source, non-profit tool for using data from direct-to-consumer genetic testing to calculate and interpret polygenic risk scores. Frontiers in Genetics. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.00578.
Furnham, A., Moutafi, J., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2005). Personality and intelligence: Gender, the big five, self-estimated and psychometric intelligence. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0965-075X.2005.00296.x.
Ganna, A., Verweij, K. J. H., Nivard, M. G., Maier, R., Wedow, R., Busch, A. S., et al. (2019). Large-scale GWAS reveals insights into the genetic architecture of same-sex sexual behavior. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat7693.
Gason, A. A., Aitken, M. A., Metcalfe, S. A., Allen, K. J., & Delatycki, M. B. (2005). Genetic susceptibility screening in schools: Attitudes of the school community towards hereditary haemochromatosis. Clinical Genetics, 67(2), 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004.2004.00389.x.
Genes, Education, and Equity: It’s complicated. (2020). BOLD Blog. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDoMZfZ-fNk.
Grigorenko, E. L. (2007). How can genomics inform education? Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2007.00001.x.
Harden, K. P. (2018a). Opinion|Why progressives should embrace the genetics of education (Published 2018). The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/24/opinion/dna-nature-genetics-education.html.
Harden, K. P. (2018b). Predicting education from DNA? BOLD. https://bold.expert/predicting-education-from-dna/.
Harden, K. P., Domingue, B. W., Belsky, D. W., Boardman, J. D., Crosnoe, R., Malanchini, M., Nivard, M., Tucker-Drob, E. M., & Harris, K. M. (2019). Genetic associations with mathematics tracking and persistence in secondary school. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/598532.
Harden, P. (2020). Brief FAQ on “Genetic Associations with Mathematics Tracking and Persistence.” Medium. https://medium.com/@kph3k/brief-faq-on-genetic-associations-with-mathematics-tracking-and-persistence-20dddc39442d.
Hart, S. A. (2016). Precision education enitiative: Moving towards personalized education. Mind, Brain and Education : The Official Journal of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society, 10(4), 209–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12109.
Haworth, C. M. A., & Plomin, R. (2012). Genetics and education: Toward a genetically sensitive classroom. In APA educational psychology handbook, Vol 1: Theories, constructs, and critical issues (pp. 529–559). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/13273-018.
Hill, W. D., Davies, N. M., Ritchie, S. J., Skene, N. G., Bryois, J., Bell, S., Angelantonio, E. D., Roberts, D. J., Xueyi, S., Davies, G., Liewald, D. C. M., Porteous, D. J., Hayward, C., Butterworth, A. S., McIntosh, A. M., Gale, C. R., & Deary, I. J. (2019). Genetic analysis identifies molecular systems and biological pathways associated with household income. BioRxiv, 573691,. https://doi.org/10.1101/573691.
Janssens, A. C. J. W. (2019). Validity of polygenic risk scores: Are we measuring what we think we are? Human Molecular Genetics, 00(00), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddz205.
Keller, J. (2005). In genes we trust: The biological component of psychological essentialism and its relationship to mechanisms of motivated social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(4), 686–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.1996.
Khera, A. V., Chaffin, M., Wade, K. H., Zahid, S., Brancale, J., Xia, R., Distefano, M., Senol-Cosar, O., Haas, M. E., Bick, A., Aragam, K. G., Lander, E. S., Smith, G. D., Mason-Suares, H., Fornage, M., Lebo, M., Timpson, N. J., Kaplan, L. M., & Kathiresan, S. (2019). Polygenic prediction of weight and obesity trajectories from birth to adulthood. Cell, 177(3), 587-596.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.028.
Krapohl, E., Rimfeld, K., Shakeshaft, N. G., Trzaskowski, M., McMillan, A., Pingault, J.-B., Asbury, K., Harlaar, N., Kovas, Y., Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. (2014). The high heritability of educational achievement reflects many genetically influenced traits, not just intelligence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(42), 15273–15278. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1408777111.
Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134.
Lebowitz, M. S., & Ahn, W. (2014). Effects of biological explanations for mental disorders on clinicians’ empathy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(50), 17786–17790. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1414058111.
Lebowitz, M. S., & Ahn, W.-K. (2017). Testing positive for a genetic predisposition to depression magnifies retrospective memory for depressive symptoms. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 85(11), 1052–1063. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000254.
Lebowitz, M. S., & Ahn, W. (2018). Blue genes? Understanding and mitigating negative consequences of personalized information about genetic risk for depression. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 27(1), 204–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0140-5.
Lebowitz, M. S., Ahn, W., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2013). Fixable or fate? Perceptions of the biology of depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81(3), 518–527. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031730.
Lebowitz, M. S., Ahn, W., & Oltman, K. (2015). Sometimes more competent, but always less warm: Perceptions of biologically oriented mental-health clinicians. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 61(7), 668–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764015573086.
Lee, J. J., Wedow, R., Okbay, A., Kong, E., Maghzian, O., Zacher, M., Nguyen-Viet, T. A., et al. (2018). Gene discovery and polygenic prediction from a genome-wide association study of educational attainment in 1.1 million individuals. Nature Genetics, 50(8), 1112. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0147-3.
Lineweaver, T. T., Bondi, M. W., Galasko, D., & Salmon, D. P. (2014). Effect of knowledge of APOE genotype on subjective and objective memory performance in healthy older adults. American Journal of Psychiatry, 171(2), 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12121590.
Luciano, M., Evans, D. M., Hansell, N. K., Medland, S. E., Montgomery, G. W., Martin, N. G., Wright, M. J., & Bates, T. C. (2013). A genome-wide association study for reading and language abilities in two population cohorts. Genes, Brain, and Behavior, 12(6), 645–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/gbb.12053.
Martin, A. R., Gignoux, C. R., Walters, R. K., Wojcik, G. L., Neale, B. M., Gravel, S., Daly, M. J., Bustamante, C. D., & Kenny, E. E. (2017). Human demographic history impacts genetic risk prediction across diverse populations. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 100(4), 635–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.03.004.
Martin, A. R., Kanai, M., Kamatani, Y., Okada, Y., Neale, B. M., & Daly, M. J. (2019). Clinical use of current polygenic risk scores may exacerbate health disparities. Nature Genetics, 51(4), 584–591. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-019-0379-x.
Martschenko, D. (2019). What does genetics mean for educational equity? BOLD. https://bold.expert/what-does-genetics-mean-for-educational-equity/.
Martschenko, D., Trejo, S., & Domingue, B. W. (2019). Genetics and education: Recent developments in the context of an ugly history and an uncertain future. AERA Open, 5(1), 2332858418810516. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418810516.
Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K. E., et al. (2000). Manual for the patterns of adaptive learning scales. . Michigan: The University of Michigan.
Morris, T. T., Davies, N. M., & Smith, G. D. (2019). Can education be personalised using pupils’ genetic data? BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/645218.
Mostafavi, H., Harpak, A., Conley, D., Pritchard, J. K., & Przeworski, M. (2019). Variable prediction accuracy of polygenic scores within an ancestry group. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/629949.
Need, A. C., & Goldstein, D. B. (2009). Next generation disparities in human genomics: Concerns and remedies. Trends in Genetics, 25(11), 489–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2009.09.012.
Paquette, M., Chong, M., Thériault, S., Dufour, R., Paré, G., & Baass, A. (2017). Polygenic risk score predicts prevalence of cardiovascular disease in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Journal of Clinical Lipidology, 11(3), 725-732.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2017.03.019.
Persky, S., & Eccleston, C. P. (2011). Impact of genetic causal information on medical students’ clinical encounters with an obese virtual patient: Health promotion and social stigma. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 41(3), 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-010-9242-0.
Plomin, R., Kovas, Y., & Haworth, C. M. A. (2007). Generalist genes: Genetic links between brain, mind, and education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2007.00002.x.
Plomin, R., & von Stumm, S. (2018). The new genetics of intelligence. Nature Reviews Genetics, 19(3), 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2017.104.
Plomin, R., & Walker, S. O. (2003). Genetics and educational psychology. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709903762869888.
Popejoy, A. B., & Fullerton, S. M. (2016). Genomics is failing on diversity. Nature News, 538(7624), 161. https://doi.org/10.1038/538161a.
Regalado, A. (2018). Precision education: DNA test for intelligence could be on the horizon. Genetic Literacy Project. https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2018/04/10/precision-education-dna-test-for-intelligence-could-be-on-the-horizon/.
Regalado, A. (2019). More than 26 million people have taken an at-home ancestry test. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/02/11/103446/more-than-26-million-people-have-taken-an-at-home-ancestry-test/.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. . Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rosenberg, N. A., Edge, M. D., Pritchard, J. K., & Feldman, M. W. (2019). Interpreting polygenic scores, polygenic adaptation, and human phenotypic differences. Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health, 2019(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/emph/eoy036.
Rosenberg, N. A., Huang, L., Jewett, E. M., Szpiech, Z. A., Jankovic, I., & Boehnke, M. (2010). Genome-wide association studies in diverse populations. Nature Reviews Genetics, 11(5), 356–366. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2760.
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. The Urban Review, 3(1), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02322211.
Rothstein, L. F. (1998). Genetic information in schools. In Genetic secrets: Protecting privacy and confidentiality in the genetic era (pp. 317–320).
Sabatello, M. (2018). A genomically informed education system? Challenges for behavioral genetics. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics: A Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 46(1), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110518766027.
Sabatello, M., & Juengst, E. (2019). Genomic essentialism: Its provenance and trajectory as an anticipatory ethical concern. Hastings Center Report, 49(S1), S10–S18. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1012.
Savage, J. E., Jansen, P. R., Stringer, S., Watanabe, K., Bryois, J., de Leeuw, C. A., Nagel, M., Awasthi, S., Barr, P. B., Coleman, J. R. I., Grasby, K. L., Hammerschlag, A. R., Kaminski, J., Karlsson, R., Krapohl, E., Lam, M., Nygaard, M., Reynolds, C. A., Trampush, J. W., & Posthuma, D. (2017). GWAS meta-analysis (N=279,930) identifies new genes and functional links to intelligence. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/184853.
Schmidt, I. W., Berg, I. J., & Deelman, B. G. (1999). Illusory superiority in self-reported memory of older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 6(4), 288–301. https://doi.org/10.1076/1382-5585(199912)06:04;1-B;FT288.
Stéphane. (2018). What is your IQ score? DNA intelligence tests. GenePlaza Blog. https://www.geneplaza.com/blog/en/dna-test-iq-score/.
Su, P. (2013). Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: A comprehensive view. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 86(3), 359–365.
Turnwald, B. P., Goyer, J. P., Boles, D. Z., Silder, A., Delp, S. L., & Crum, A. J. (2019). Learning one’s genetic risk changes physiology independent of actual genetic risk. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0483-4.
von Stumm, S., Smith-Woolley, E., Ayorech, Z., McMillan, A., Rimfeld, K., Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. (2020). Predicting educational achievement from genomic measures and socioeconomic status. Developmental Science, 23(3), e12925. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12925.
Williamson, B. (2018). A biosocial view on precision education. BOLD. https://bold.expert/a-biosocial-view-on-precision-education/.
This research was made possible by funding from The Hastings Center, the Columbia University Center for Research on the Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Psychiatric, Neurologic and Behavioral Genetics (National Institutes of health grant, RM1HG007257), and a Columbia Precision Medicine and Society Pilot Grant Award. This research was conducted as part of postdoctoral training for Lucas J. Matthews
This research was conducted with pilot funding from a grant from the National Human Genome Research Institute (RM1HG007257).
Conflict of interest
Authors Lucas J. Matthews, Matthew S. Lebowitz, Ruth Ottman, and Paul S. Appelbaum declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval and informed consent
Approval to conduct this human subjects research was obtained from the New York State Psychiatric Institute’s Institutional Review Board. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Matthews, L.J., Lebowitz, M.S., Ottman, R. et al. Pygmalion in the genes? On the potentially negative impacts of polygenic scores for educational attainment. Soc Psychol Educ 24, 789–808 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09632-z
- Polygenic risk score
- Direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC)
- Predictive genetic testing