Students’ critical incidents of fairness in classroom assessment: an empirical study
Conceptualizing fairness through social psychology theory has recently been called for in classroom assessment (CA) literature. This study used two open-ended questionnaires to explore university students’ critical incidents of fairness and unfairness and their affective and behavioral reactions to experiences of un/fairness. The findings showed that students’ perceptions of CA fairness were comprised of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice principles. Collectively, students considered the distribution of outcomes, the procedures for outcome distributions, the interpersonal relationships, and the communication procedures in conceptualizing fairness. Students also reported positive feelings such as happiness, satisfaction, feeling valued, and hopefulness when describing fair incidents, while they tended to report negative feelings such as anger, upset, disappointment, and embarrassment as responses to unfair incidents. Students also reported increased classroom engagement and greater adaptation in responses to fairness incidents, while they reported class disengagement, inaction, and dissent as responses to unfair incidents. Building on these empirical findings, a more comprehensive conceptualization of fairness in CA contexts is proposed.
KeywordsFairness Classroom assessment Social psychology of justice Iranian students University
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Bempechat, J., Ronfard, S., Mirny, A., Li, J., & Holloway, S. D. (2013). She always gives grades lower than one deserves: A qualitative study of Russian adolescents’ perceptions of fairness in the classroom. Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 7, 169–187.Google Scholar
- Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43–55). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
- Brookhart, S. M. (2003). Developing measurement theory for classroom assessment purposes and uses. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22, 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2003.tb00139.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1975.tb01000.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Folger, R. (2001). Fairness as deonance. In S. W. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner, & D. Skarlicki (Eds.), Theoretical and cultural perspectives on organizational justice (pp. 3–33). Greenwich: Information Age.Google Scholar
- Greenberg, J. (1993). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 79–103). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Greenberg, J. (2011). Organizational justice: The dynamics of fairness in the workplace. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 271–327). Washington, DC: APA Press.Google Scholar
- Israelashvili, M. (1997). Situational determinants of school students’ feelings of injustice. Elementary School Guidance & Counseling, 31, 283–292.Google Scholar
- Oppenheimer, R. (1989). Fairness in the classroom: An empirical extension of the notion of organizational justice. Developments in business simulation and experiential learning, 16. Retrieved January 29, 2019 from https://journals.tdl.org/absel/index.php/absel/article/view/1867.
- Rodabaugh, R. C. (1994). College students’ perceptions of unfairness in the classroom. Retrieved January 29, 2019 from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/podimproveacad/319.
- Seifi, Z. (2017, January, 29). The ratio of female and male teachers and students in Iran. Mehr News Agency. Retrieved January 29, 2019 from https://www.mehrnews.com/news/3890596/.
- Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Tierney, R. (2013). Fairness in classroom assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 125–144). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- Tierney, R. (2016). Fairness in educational assessment. In M. A. Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory (pp. 1–6). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
- Vogl, E., & Pekrun, R. (2016). Emotions that matter to achievement: Student feelings about assessment. In G. T. L. Brown & L. R. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 111–128). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar