Qualitative insights into the relationship between socioeconomic status and students’ academic achievement goals

Article
  • 35 Downloads

Abstract

Recent research using quantitative methodologies and an emerging social psychological theory of socioeconomic status (SES) has found an association between students’ SES and their academic achievement goals. As a new area of research in the achievement goal tradition, there has been little investigation of the contextual influences upon particular goal orientations in divergent SES contexts. To explore these influences, focus groups were conducted with 24 secondary school students aged 16–17 years attending a high and a low SES school in New South Wales, Australia. These teenagers were approaching a ‘developmental deadline’ which required immediate decisions about future work and education pathways. As such, they could be experiencing a period of heightened contextual influences. Directed content analysis of the focus groups observed the broad distinctions in achievement goals seen in previous quantitative studies. However, the analysis elucidated some of the ways in which norms and values in different SES contexts influenced the adoption of particular goal orientations. In some cases, the same orientation had markedly different contextual influences stemming from students’ SES backgrounds. From these exploratory findings, we argue for further research into the factors which influence the adoption of different achievement goals by students from different SES backgrounds.

Keywords

Achievement goals Socioeconomic status Directed content analysis 

References

  1. Ames, C. (1984). Competitive, cooperative and individualistic goal structures: A cognitive-motivational analysis. In R. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 1, pp. 177–207). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260–267.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger, N. (2013). Exploring the motivational goals of preliminary HSC students from divergent socioeconomic backgrounds. (Unpublished master’s thesis), The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.  https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2044.9288.
  5. Berger, N., & Archer, J. (2015). The relationship between social class and students’ academic achievement goals: Three hypotheses. In C. Rubie-Davies, J. Stephens, & P. Watson (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of social psychology of the classroom (pp. 31–41). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Berger, N., & Archer, J. (2016). School socio-economic status and student socio-academic achievement goals in upper secondary contexts. Social Psychology of Education, 19(1), 175–194.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-015-9324-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bosch, G., & Charest, J. (2008). Vocational training and the labour market in liberal and coordinated economies. Industrial Relations Journal, 39(5), 428–447.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2338.2008.00497.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.  https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, D. K. (2001). The social sources of educational credentialism: Status cultures, labor markets, and organizations. Sociology of Education, 74, 19–34.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2673251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chankseliani, M., James Relly, S., & Laczik, A. (2016). Overcoming vocational prejudice: How can skills competitions improve the attractiveness of vocational education and training in the UK? British Educational Research Journal, 42(4), 582–599.  https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cruz Rankovic, O. (2017). Högstadieelevers studiemotivation, self-efficacy och uppfattning av andras förväntningar: Ett socioekonomiskt perspektiv. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Lund University, Lund, Sweden. Retrieved from http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/8898720.
  12. Dowson, M., & McInerney, D. M. (2001). Psychological parameters of students’ social and work avoidance goals: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 35–42.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dweck, C. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040–1048.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elliot, A. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169–189.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elliot, A., & Church, M. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218–232.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elliot, A., & Harackiewicz, J. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 461–475.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elliot, A., & Murayama, K. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 613–628.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elliot, A., Murayama, K., & Pekrun, R. (2011). A 3 × 2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 632–648.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goddard, C. (2009). ‘Not taking yourself too seriously’ in Australian English: Semantic explications, cultural scripts, corpus evidence. Intercultural Pragmatics, 6(1), 29–53.  https://doi.org/10.1515/IPRG.2009.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gutman, L. M. (2006). How student and parent goal orientations and classroom goal structures influence the math achievement of African-Americans during the high school transition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(1), 44–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harackiewicz, J., Barron, K., & Elliot, A. (1998). Rethinking achievement goals: When are they adaptive for college students and why? Educational Psychologist, 33(1), 1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3301_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heckhausen, J., & Tomasik, M. J. (2002). Get an apprenticeship before school is out: How German adolescents adjust vocational aspirations when getting close to a developmental deadline. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60(2), 199–219.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huang, C. (2012). Discriminant and criterion-related validity of achievement goals in predicting academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 48–73.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hulleman, C., Schrager, S., Bodmann, S., & Harackiewicz, J. (2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 422–449.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jury, M., Darnon, C., Dompnier, B., & Butera, F. (2016). The social utility of performance-approach goals in a selective educational environment. Social Psychology of Education.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-016-9354-x.Google Scholar
  27. Jury, M., Smeding, A., Court, M., & Darnon, C. (2015). When first-generation students succeed at university: On the link between social class, academic performance, and performance-avoidance goals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 25–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.11.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaplan, A., Gheen, M., & Midgley, C. (2002). Classroom goal structure and student disruptive behavior. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 191–211.  https://doi.org/10.1348/000709902158847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kraus, M., Piff, P., Mendoza-Denton, P. R., Rheinschmidt, M., & Keltner, D. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review, 119(3), 546–572.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kraus, M., & Stephens, N. (2012). A road map for an emerging psychology of social class. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(9), 642–656.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00453.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Levy, I., Kaplan, A., & Patrick, H. (2004). Early adolescents’ achievement goals, social status, and attitudes towards cooperation with peers. Social Psychology of Education, 7(2), 127–159.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SPOE.0000018547.08294.b6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Massey, E., Gebhardt, W., & Garnefski, N. (2008). Adolescent goal content and pursuit: A review of the literature from the past 16 years. Developmental Review, 28(4), 421–460.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2008.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2001). Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 77–86.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nelson, R. M., & DeBacker, T. K. (2008). Achievement motivation in adolescents: The role of peer climate and best friends. Journal of Experimental Education, 76(2), 170–189.  https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.76.2.170-190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nicholls, J. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91(3), 328–346.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Patrick, H., Kaplan, A., & Ryan, A. (2011). Positive classroom motivational environments: Convergence between mastery goal structure and classroom social climate. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 367–382.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91–105.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Piff, P., Martinez, A., Stancato, D., Kraus, M., & Keltner, D. (2012). Class, chaos, and the construction of community. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(6), 949–962.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Poortvliet, P. M., & Darnon, C. (2010). Toward a more social understanding of achievement goals: The interpersonal effects of mastery and performance goals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(5), 324–328.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410383246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smeding, A., Darnon, C., Souchal, C., Toczek-Capelle, M.-C., & Butera, F. (2013). Reducing the socio-economic status achievement gap at university by promoting mastery-oriented assessment. PLoS ONE, 8(8), e71678.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sommet, N., Quiamzade, A., Jury, M., & Mugny, G. (2015). The student-institution fit at university: Interactive effects of academic competition and social class on achievement goals. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 769.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stephens, N., Fryberg, S., & Markus, H. (2011). When choice does not equal freedom: A sociocultural analysis of agency in working-class American contexts. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(1), 22–41.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550610378757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stephens, N., Fryberg, S., Markus, H., Johnson, C., & Covarrubias, R. (2012). Unseen disadvantage: How American universities’ focus on independence undermines the academic performance of first-generation college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1178–1197.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stephens, N., Markus, H., & Townsend, S. (2007). Choice as an act of meaning: The case of social class. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 814–830.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vickerstaff, S. (2007). ‘I was just the boy around the place’: What made apprenticeships successful? Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 59(3), 331–347.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820701520369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhang, Y., Watermann, R., & Daniel, A. (2016). Are multiple goals in elementary students beneficial for their school achievement? A latent class analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 100–110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Educational ResearchWestern Sydney UniversitySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.School of EducationThe University of NewcastleNewcastleAustralia

Personalised recommendations