Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring teachers’ interpersonal self-efficacy: relationship with realized interpersonal aspirations, classroom management efficacy and age

  • Published:
Social Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we present the development and validation of an instrument for measuring teachers’ interpersonal self-efficacy: the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction-Self-Efficacy (QTI-SE). We used the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction as a basis to construct items. Current scales on teacher self-efficacy in classroom management cover interpersonal self-efficacy mostly indirect or they specifically focus on the efficacy to convey relatively high levels of teacher agency (e.g., the teacher’s ability to maintain or restore classroom discipline). The QTI-SE is an instrument measuring teachers’ interpersonal self-efficacy more comprehensively and in a reliable and valid way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armor, D., Conroy-Oseguera, P., Cox, M., King, N., McDonnell, L., & Pascal, A. (1976). Analysis of the school preferred reading programs in selected Los Angeles minority schools (Report no. R-2007-LAUSD). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for creating self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bong, M. (2006). Asking the right question: How confident are you could successfully perform these tasks? In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 287–305). Greenwich, CT: In-formation Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brekelmans, M. (1989). Interpersonal teacher behaviour in the classroom. Utrecht: W.C.C. (in Dutch).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brekelmans, M. (2010). Klimaatverandering in de klas. Rede uitgesproken bij de aanvaarding van het ambt van hoogleraar ‘Onderwijskunde, in het bijzonder Leren in interactie’. Universiteit Utrecht.

  • Brekelmans, M., Sleegers, P., & Fraser, B. (2000). Teaching for active learning. In R. J. Simons, J. van der Linden, & T. Duffy (Eds.), New learning (pp. 227–242). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brekelmans, M., Wubbels, T., & Van Tartwijk, J. (2005). Teacher–student relationships across the teaching career. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(1), 55–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., & Steca, P. (2003). Efficacy beliefs as determinants of teachers’ job satisfaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 821–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesnut, S. R., & Burley, H. (2015). Self-efficacy as a predictor of commitment to the teaching profession: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 15, 751–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coladarci, T. (1992). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching. The Journal of Experimental Education, 60(4), 323–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9.

  • Day, C., Stobart, G., Sammons, P., Kington, A., Qing, G., & Smees, R. (2006). Variations in teachers’ work, lives and effectiveness. London: Department for Education and Skills.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dellinger, A. M., Bobbet, J. J., Olivier, D. F., & Ellet, C. D. (2008). Measuring teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs: Development and use of the TEBS-Self. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 751–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Den Brok, P., Brekelmans, M., & Wubbels, T. (2004). Interpersonal teacher behaviour and student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15, 407–442. doi:10.1080/09243450512331383262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Den Brok, P., Brekelmans, M., & Wubbels, T. (2006). Multilevel issues in research using students’ perceptions of learning environments: The case of the questionnaire on teacher interaction. Learning Environments Research, 9, 199–213. doi:10.1007/s10984-006-9013-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, M. A., Moskowitz, D. S., & Zuroff, D. (2011). Origins and applications of the interpersonal circumplex. In L. M. Horowitz & S. Strack (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment and therapeutic interventions (pp. 57–74). Hobroken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, I. A. (2003). Self-efficacy and burnout in teaching: The importance of interpersonal-relations efficacy. Social Psychology of Education, 6(3), 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goh, S., & Fraser, B. J. (2000). Teacher interpersonal teacher behaviour and elementary students’ outcomes. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 14, 216–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, J. L., & Alvarez, H. K. (2008). School climate factors relating to teacher burnout: A mediator model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1349–1363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, Q. (2014). The role of relational resilience in teachers’ career-long commitment and effectiveness. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 20(5), 502–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R. (1982). Differences in teachers’ perceptions of personal control of positive versus negative student learning outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 7, 70–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 63–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, D. T. (1995). The call to teach. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, L. M., & Strack, S. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of interpersonal theory: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler, D. J. (1983). The 1982 interpersonal circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions. Psychological Review, 90, 185–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. M., & Chui, M. (2010). Effects on teachers’ self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 741–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. M., Tze, V. M. C., Betts, S. M., & Gordon, K. A. (2011). Teacher efficacy research 1998–2009: Signs of progress or unfulfilled promise? Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 21–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunter, M., Frenzel, A., Nagy, G., Baumert, J., & Pekrun, R. (2011). Teacher enthusiasm: Dimensionality and context specificity. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 289–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainhard, T. (2015). Liking a tough teacher—Interpersonal characteristics of teaching and students’ achievement goals. School Psychology International, 36(6), 559–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainhard, M. T., Brekelmans, M., Wubbels, T., & den Brok, P. J. (2008). Leraren in een nieuwe klas: de eerste maanden van een nieuw schooljaar [Teachers in a new class: The first months of a new school year]. Pedagogische Studiën, 85(3), 157–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teacher. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pennings, H. J. M., Brekelmans, M., Wubbels, T., van der Want, A. C., Claessens, L. C. A., & Van Tartwijk, J. (2014). A nonlinear dynamical systems approach to real-time teacher behavior: Differences between teachers. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 18(1), 23–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2007). Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors, perceived collective teacher efficacy, and teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 611–625.

  • Sinclair, C., Dowson, M., & Mcinerney, D. (2006). Motivations to teach: Psychometric perspectives across the first semester of teacher education. Teachers College Record, 108, 1132–1154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siwatu, K. O. (2007). Preservice teachers′ culturally responsive teaching self-efficacy and outcome expectancy beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 1086–1101.

  • Spilt, J. M., Koomen, H. M. Y., & Thijs, J. T. (2011). Teacher wellbeing: The importance of teacher–student relationships. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 457–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy capturing: An elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(2001), 783–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. W. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 944–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veldman, I., Admiraal, W., Van Tartwijk, J., Mainhard, T., & Wubbels, T. (2016). Veteran teachers’ job satisfaction as a function of personal demands and resources in the relationships with their students. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 22(8), 913–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veldman, I., Van Tartwijk, J., Brekelmans, M., & Wubbels, T. (2013). Job satisfaction and teacher–student relationships across the teaching career. Four case studies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 32, 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieluf, S., Kunter, M., & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2013). Teacher self-efficacy in cross-national perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, 92–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, K. F. (2000). Positive teacher efficacy as an obstacle to educational reform. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 34(1), 14–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, K. F. (2002). The potential benefits of teacher efficacy doubts for educational reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395–412.

  • Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Burke Spero, R. (2005). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: A comparison of four measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 343–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Davis, H. A. (2006). Teacher self-efficacy and its influence on the achievement of adolescents. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 117–137). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

  • Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., Den Brok, P., Levy, J., Mainhard, T., & Van Tartwijk, J. (2012). Let’s make things better: Developments in research on interpersonal relationships in education. In T. Wubbels, P. Den Brok, J. Van Tartwijk, & J. Levy (Eds.), interpersonal relationships in education (pp. 225–250). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., den Brok, P., & van Tartwijk, J. (2006). An interpersonal perspective on classroom management in secondary classrooms in the Netherlands. In C. Evertson & C. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 1161–1191). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., Den Brok, P., Wijsman, L., Mainhard, T., & Van Tartwijk, J. (2014). Teacher–student relationships and classroom management. In E. Emmer & E. J. Sabornie (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management (pp. 363–386). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wubbels, Th., Créton, H. A., & Hooymayers, H. P. (1985). Discipline problems of beginning teachers: Interactional teacher behaviour mapped out. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association Research Association (AERA).

  • Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2016). Teacher Self-Efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A syntheses of 40 years of research. Review of Educational research, 86, 1–35.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ietje Veldman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Veldman, I., Admiraal, W., Mainhard, T. et al. Measuring teachers’ interpersonal self-efficacy: relationship with realized interpersonal aspirations, classroom management efficacy and age. Soc Psychol Educ 20, 411–426 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9374-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9374-1

Keywords

Navigation