Skip to main content
Log in

Teachers’ sense of responsibility for educational outcomes and its associations with teachers’ instructional approaches and professional wellbeing

  • Published:
Social Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Teachers’ formal accountability and duties have been the focus of high-stakes educational reforms, for instance in the context of national accountability systems. Yet, teachers’ sense of personal (rather than formal) responsibility and willingness to assume responsibility for their teaching and students remains an understudied area. The main purpose of this study was to investigate contextual and person-specific predictors of teachers’ sense of personal responsibility, as well as the potential implications of teachers’ personal responsibility for their instructional approaches and wellbeing. A path analysis indicated that high school teachers (n = 287) who felt responsible for their teaching and students reported higher levels of work engagement and job satisfaction than less responsible teachers, and were more likely to endorse mastery-oriented instructional practices that emphasized student effort, task mastery, and individual growth. Teachers’ perceptions of their school’s social climate (teachers’ evaluations of their relationships with students), their sense of teaching self-efficacy, and incremental beliefs of intelligence emerged as positive predictors of teacher responsibility. Teacher responsibility partially mediated the positive effects of these predictors on teachers’ wellbeing and mastery-oriented instructional practices. The results suggest that both contextual (e.g., school climate) and person-specific (e.g., self-efficacy) factors can contribute to teachers’ sense of personal responsibility, and that responsibility, in turn, can have positive implications for teachers’ wellbeing and instructional practices. Directions for future research and practical implications are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The item “Factors beyond my control have a greater influence on my students’ achievement than I do” led to decreased internal consistency and decreased predictive validity of the overall scale. This item was therefore removed from the analyses. Excluding two additional reverse worded items would have improved the internal consistency of the scale further (up to α = .63; see van Sonderen et al. 2013, regarding psychometric challenges related to reverse worded items). However, the exclusion of these two additional items would have reduced the scale’s predictive validity in the present study. These items were therefore retained in our analyses, so we can explain additional variance in our outcome measures. Our main results are consistent with and without these items.

References

  • Anderson, J.A. (2005). Accountability in Education. Jointly published by The International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP), Paris, and the International Academy of Education (IAE), Brussels. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001409/140986e.pdf.

  • Bakker, A. B., Hakanen, J. J., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betoret, F. D. (2006). Stressors, self-efficacy, coping resources, and burnout among secondary school teachers in Spain. Educational Psychology, 26(4), 519–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 17(3), 303–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borg, M. G. (1990). Occupational stress in British educational settings: A review. Educational Psychology, 10(2), 103–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2004). Epistemological beliefs and implicit theories of intelligence as predictors of achievement goals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(4), 371–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1989). Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 445–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, E. G., & McIver, J. P. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of covariance structures. In G. W. Bohrnstedt & E. E. Borgata (Eds.), Social measurement: Current issues (pp. 65–115). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collie, R. J., Shapka, J. D., & Perry, N. E. (2012). School climate and social-emotional learning: Predicting teacher stress, job satisfaction, and teaching efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1189–1204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., & Wright, T. A. (2001). When a” happy” worker is really a” productive” worker: A review and further refinement of the happy-productive worker thesis. Consulting Psychology Journal Practice and Research, 53(3), 182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dacre Pool, L., & Qualter, P. (2013). Emotional self-efficacy, graduate employability, and career satisfaction: Testing the associations. Australian Journal of Psychology, 65(4), 214–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Nobile, J. J., & McCormick, J. (2008). Organizational communication and job satisfaction in Australian Catholic primary schools. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 36(1), 101–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deemer, S. (2004). Classroom goal orientation in high school classrooms: Revealing links between teacher beliefs and classroom environments. Educational Research, 46(1), 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. B., Randolph, A., & Spillane, J. P. (2004). Teachers’ expectations and sense of responsibility for student learning: The importance of race, class, and organizational habitus. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 35(1), 75–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia PA: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S., & Henderson, V. L. (1989). Theories of intelligence: Background and measures. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Kansas City, MO.

  • Eren, A. (2014). Uncovering the links between prospective teachers’ personal responsibility, academic optimism, hope, and emotions about teaching: a mediation analysis. Social Psychology of Education, 17(1), 73–104. doi:10.1007/s11218-013-9243-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eren, A. (2015). ‘Not only satisfied and responsible, but also hopeful’: prospective teachers’ career choice satisfaction, hope, and personal responsibility. Cambridge Journal of Education, 45(2), 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2011). Literature review. Quality in teachers’ continuing professional development. Resource document European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/education/policy/strategic-framework/doc/teacher-development_en.pdf Accessed 9 Mar 2016.

  • Eurydice European Unit (2008). Levels of autonomy and responsibilities of teachers in Europe. Brussels: Eurydice. Retrived from http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/thematic_reports/094en.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38(1), 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, B. A., Miller, R. B., Crowson, H. M., Duke, B. L., & Akey, K. L. (2004). Predicting high school students’ cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(4), 462–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guglielmi, D., Bruni, I., Simbula, S., Fraccaroli, F., & Depolo, M. (2016). What drives teacher engagement: A study of different age cohorts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31(3), 323–340. doi:10.1007/s10212-015-0263-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagenauer, G., Hascher, T., & Volet, S. E. (2015). Teacher emotions in the classroom: Associations with students’ engagement, classroom discipline and the interpersonal teacher-student relationship. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30(4), 385–403. doi:10.1007/s10212-015-0250-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 495–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halvorsen, A. L., Lee, V. E., & Andrade, F. H. (2009). A mixed-method study of teachers’ attitudes about teaching in urban and low-income schools. Urban Education, 44(2), 181–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (2000). Mixed emotions: Teachers’ perceptions of their interactions with students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(8), 811–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helker, K., & Wosnitza, M. (2014). Responsibility in the school context-development and validation of a heuristic framework. Frontline Learning Research, 2(3), 115–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemphill, J. F. (2003). Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. American Psychologist, 58(1), 78–80. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.1.78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk, A. E. (1993). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and the organizational health of schools. The Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 355–372.

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B., Stevens, J. J., & Zvoch, K. (2007). Teachers’ perceptions of school climate: A validity study of the revised school level environment survey (SLEQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 833–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, S., & Northrop, L. (2015). Early career outcomes for the “best and the brightest” selectivity, satisfaction, and attrition in the beginning teacher longitudinal survey. American Educational Research Journal. doi:10.3102/0002831215587352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R., Karabenick, S. A., & Burgoon, J. N. (2015). Teachers’ implicit attitudes, explicit beliefs, and the mediating role of respect and cultural responsibility on mastery and performance-focused instructional practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 533–545. doi:10.1037/a0037471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauermann, F. (2014). Teacher responsibility from the teacher’s perspective. International Journal of Educational Research, 65, 75–89. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2013.09.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauermann, F., & Karabenick, S. A. (2011). Taking teacher Responsibility into account(ability): Explicating its multiple components and theoretical status. Educational Psychologist, 46(2), 122–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauermann, F., & Karabenick, S. A. (2013). The meaning and measure of teachers’ sense of responsibility for educational outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 30, 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauermann, F., & Karabenick, S. A. (2014). Teacher responsibility: What does it mean for teachers’ motivation and emotions? In P. W. Richardson, S. A. Karabenick, & H. M. G. Watt (Eds.), Teacher motivation: Implications for theory and practice (pp. 116–132). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauermann, F., Karabenick, S. A.,Carpenter, R., & Kuusinen, C. (in press). Teacher motivation and professional commitment: The role of motives for teaching, teacher efficacy and sense of professional responsibility. In H.M.G. Watt, P.W. Richardson, & K. Smith (Eds.), Why teach? Antecedents and Consequences across Cultural Settings. Cambridge University Press

  • Lee, K. (1996). A study of teacher responses based on their conceptions of intelligence. Journal of Classroom Interactions, 31(2), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1996). Collective responsibility for learning and its effects on gains in achievement for early secondary school students. American Journal of Education, 104(2), 103–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leroy, N., Bressoux, P., Sarrazin, P., & Trouilloud, D. (2007). Impact of teachers’ implicit theories and perceived pressures on the establishment of an autonomy supportive climate. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(4), 529–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llorens, S., Schaufeli, W., Bakker, A., & Salanova, M. (2007). Does a positive gain spiral of resources, efficacy beliefs and engagement exist? Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 825–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matteucci, M. C. (2007). Teachers facing school failure: The social valorization of effort in the school context. Social Psychology of Education, 10(1), 29–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matteucci, M. C. (2008). Transferring corporate social responsibility to the school context: Teachers’ perceived responsibility for students’ failure. In A. R. Timpere (Ed.), Corporate social responsibility (pp. 207–220). New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matteucci, M. C., & Gosling, P. (2004). Italian and French teachers faced with pupil’s Academic Failure: The “Norm of Effort”. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19(2), 147–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matteucci, M. C., Tomasetto, C., Selleri, P., & Carugati, F. (2008). Teacher judgments and pupils’ causal explanations: Social valorization of effort-based explanations in school context. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23, 421–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mausethagen, S. (2013). A research review of the impact of accountability policies on teachers’ workplace relations. Educational Research Review, 9, 16–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, G. J., Finn, S. E., Eyde, L. D., Kay, G. G., Moreland, K. L., Dies, R. R., et al. (2001). Psychological testing and psychological assessment. A review of evidence and issues. American Psychologist, 56(2), 128–165. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.56.2.128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hicks, L., Roeser, R., Urdan, T., Anderman, E., et al. (1996). Patterns of adaptive learning survey (PALS). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milatz, A., Lüftenegger, M., & Schober, B. (2015). Teachers’ relationship closeness with students as a resource for teacher wellbeing: A response surface analytical approach. Frontiers in Psychology. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting developing and retaining effective teachers. Paris, France: OECD Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrenoud, P. (1994). Métier d’élève et sens du travail scolaire. Paris: ESF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Retelsdorf, J., Butler, R., Streblow, L., & Schiefele, U. (2010). Teachers’ goal orientations for teaching: Associations with instructional practices, interest in teaching, and burnout. Learning and Instruction, 20, 30–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, P. W., Karabenick, S. A., & Watt, H. M. (2014). Teacher motivation: Theory and practice. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runhaar, P., Sanders, K., & Konermann, J. (2013). Teachers’ work engagement: Considering interaction with pupils and human resources practices as job resources. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(10), 2017–2030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147–177. doi:10.1037//1082-989X.7.2.147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2003). Utrecht work engagement scale: Preliminary manual. Utrecht: Occupational Health Psychology Unit, Utrecht University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315.

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonzáles-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simbula, S., Guglielmi, D., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2011). A three-wave study of job resources, self-efficacy, and work engagement among Italian schoolteachers. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(3), 285–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2009). Does school context matter? Relations with teacher burnout and job satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(3), 518–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2011). Teacher job satisfaction and motivation to leave the teaching profession: Relations with school context, feeling of belonging, and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(6), 1029–1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spilt, J. L., Koomen, H. M., & Thijs, J. T. (2011). Teacher wellbeing: The importance of teacher–student relationships. Educational Psychology Review, 23(4), 457–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timms, C., & Brough, P. (2013). “I like being a teacher”: Career satisfaction, the work environment and work engagement. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(6), 768–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trouilloud, D., Sarrazin, P., Bressoux, P., & Bois, J. (2006). Teacher expectation effects on student perceived competence in physical education classes: Autonomy-supportive climate as a moderator. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., Midgley, C., Meyer, D. K., Gheen, M., Anderman, E. M., Kang, Y., et al. (2002). The classroom environment and students’ reports of avoidance strategies in mathematics: A multimethod study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Sonderen, E., Sanderman, R., & Coyne, J. C. (2013). Ineffectiveness of reverse wording of questionnaire items: Let’s learn from cows in the rain. PLoS ONE, 8(7), 1–7. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt, H. M. G., & Richardson, P. W. (2007). Motivational factors influencing teaching as a career choice: development and validation of the FIT Choice Scale. Journal of Experimental Education, 75, 167–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt, H. M., & Richardson, P. W. (2008). Motivations, perceptions, and aspirations concerning teaching as a career for different types of beginning teachers. Learning and Instruction, 18(5), 408–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, K. (2010). Students’ relationships with teachers. Handbook of research on schools, schooling, and human development. In J. L. Meece & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Handbook of research on schools, schooling and human development (pp. 75–91). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, P. A., Brenner, D. B., & Petrosko, J. M. (2006). Teacher job satisfaction in a reform State: The influence of teacher characteristics, job dimensions, and psychological states. Journal of School Leadership, 16(4), 416–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolfolk Hoy, A., Hoy, W. K., & Davis, H. A. (2009). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation in School (pp. 627–653). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 14(2), 121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Cristina Matteucci.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matteucci, M.C., Guglielmi, D. & Lauermann, F. Teachers’ sense of responsibility for educational outcomes and its associations with teachers’ instructional approaches and professional wellbeing. Soc Psychol Educ 20, 275–298 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9369-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9369-y

Keywords

Navigation