Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Chinese undergraduates’ sources of self-efficacy differ by sibling status, achievement, and fear of failure along two pathways

  • Published:
Social Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This mixed-methods study investigated the sources of self-efficacy reported by Chinese undergraduate students and the related role of individual differences. One hundred and fifty-six Chinese students completed a questionnaire and open-ended responses, citing the factors that contributed to feelings of greater confidence and lesser confidence. After qualitatively coding their responses, we found that students shared diverse perspectives regarding antecedents of what made them more and less confident. Quantitative analyses revealed differences in the types and frequencies of sources of self-efficacy when considering increases or decreases in confidence, and individual characteristics such as GPA, only child status, and fear of failure. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. GPAs range from 0 to 100% in China. This is the traditionally accepted GPA for high performing students, especially for those interested in graduate or professional school

References

  • Ahn, H. S., Bong, M., & Kim, S. (2016a). Social models in the cognitive appraisal of self-efficacy. Advance online publication. Contemporary Educational Psychology, (in press online).

  • Ahn, H. S., Usher, E. L., Butz, A., & Bong, M. (2016b). Cultural differences in the understanding of modelling and feedback as sources of self-efficacy information. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 112–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J. W., & Feather, N. T. (1966). A theory of achievement motivation. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2011). Social cognitive theory. In P.A.M. van Lange, A.W. Kruglanski, & E.T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of social psychological theories (pp. 349–373). London: Sage.

  • Bandura, A., & Adams, N. E. (1977). Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1, 287–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Adams, N. E., Hardy, A. B., & Howells, G. N. (1980). Tests of the generality of self-efficacy theory. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 4, 39–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, R. G. (1975). Fear of failure in the student experience. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 54, 191–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bie, D. R., & Yi, M. C. (2014). The context of higher education development and policy response in China. Studies in Higher Education, 39, 1499–1510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bong, M. (2006). Asking the right question: How confident are you that you could successfully perform these tasks? In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Adolescence and education, self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (Vol. 5, pp. 287–305). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butz, A. R., & Usher, E. L. (2015). Salient sources of early adolescents’ self-efficacy in two domains. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, L., Erkal, N., Gangadharan, L., & Meng, X. (2013). Little emperors: Behavioral pacts of China’s one-child policy. Science, 339, 953–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J. S., Usher, E. L., & Butz, A. R. (2015). Examining students’ perceived autonomy support as a source of self-efficacy in mathematics. Poster session presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, Chicago, IL.

  • Covington, M. V. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Covington, M. V. (2000). Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: An integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 171–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Castella, K., Byrne, D., & Covington, M. (2013). Unmotivated or motivated to fail? A cross-cultural study of achievement motivation, fear of failure, and student disengagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 861–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1980). Fifty years of conflict. In Festinger, L. (Ed.), Retrospections on social psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Falbo, T. (1987). Only children in the United States and China. Applied Social Psychology Annual, 7, 159–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falbo, T. (2012). Only children: An updated review. Journal of Individual Psychology, 68, 38–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falbo, T., & Hooper, S. Y. (2015). China’s only children and psychopathology: A quantitative synthesis. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 85(3), 259–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falbo, T., & Polit, D. F. (1986). Quantitative review of the only child literature: Research evidence and theory development. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 176–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falbo, T., & Poston, D. L. (1993). The academic, personality, and physical outcomes of only children in China. Child Development, 64, 18–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florack, A., & Hartmann, J. (2007). Regulatory focus and investment decisions in small groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 626–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fong, V. L. (2004). Only hope: Coming of age under China’s one-child policy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fong, C. J., & Krause, J. M. (2014). Lost confidence and potential: A mixed methods study of underachieving college students’ sources of self-efficacy. Social Psychology of Education, 17, 249–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, N. Z., & Mason, E. (2003). Learning disabilities, gender, sources of efficacy, self-efficacy beliefs, and academic achievement in high school students. Journal of School Psychology, 41, 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. New York: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heine, S. J., & Hamamura, T. (2007). In search of East Asian self-enhancement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 4–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heine, S. J., Kitayama, S., & Lehman, D. R. (2001a). Cultural differences in self-evaluation Japanese readily accept negative self-relevant information. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 434–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heine, S. J., Kitayama, S., Lehman, D. R., Takata, T., Ide, E., Leung, C., et al. (2001b). Divergent consequences of success and failure in Japan and North America: An investigation of self-improving motivations and malleable selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 599–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderlong, J., & Lepper, M. R. (2002). The effects of praise on children’s intrinsic motivation: A review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 774–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hepper, E. G., Sedikides, C., & Cai, H. (2013). Self-enhancement and self-protection strategies in China: Cultural expressions of a fundamental human motive. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, W. E. (1990). Fear of failure as a distinctive personality trait measure of test anxiety. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 23, 180–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, D. Y. (1998). Interpersonal relationships and relationship dominance: An analysis based on methodological relationism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiao, S., Ji, G., Jing, Q., & Ching, C. C. (1986). Comparative study of behavioral qualities of only children and sibling children. Child Development, 57, 357–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joët, G., Usher, E. L., & Bressoux, P. (2011). Sources of self-efficacy: An investigation of elementary school students in France. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 649–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. M. (2004). A cross-cultural investigation of the efficacy beliefs of South Asian immigrant and anglo Canadian nonimmigrant early adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 731–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, H. L. (1956). Children’s work attitudes and sibling characteristics. Child Development, 27, 289–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. E. (1992). Day care in the People’s Republic of China. In Child care in context: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 355–392), Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. J., Marsh, H. W., & Debus, R. L. (2001). Self-handicapping and defensive pessimism: Exploring a model of predictors and outcomes from a self-protection perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. J., Marsh, H. W., & Debus, R. L. (2003). Self-handicapping and defensive pessimism: A model of self-protection from a longitudinal perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2015). 2014 National Educational Development Statistics Bulletin, Retrieved from http://www.moe.edu.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5987/201507/t20150730_196698.html.

  • Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oettingen, G., & Zosuls, K. M. (2006). Culture and self-efficacy in adolescents. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 245–265). Greenwich: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (2006). Self-efficacy during childhood and adolescence. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Adolescence and education. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (Vol. 5, pp. 339–367). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Self and self-belief in psychology and education: A historical perspective. In J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education (pp. 3–21). New York: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poston, D. L., Jr., & Falbo, T. (1990). Academic performance and personality traits of Chinese children:” Onlies” versus others. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 433–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, J. M. (1992). Self-handicapping and achievement. In A. K. Boggiano & T. P. Pittman (Eds.), Achievement and motivation: A social-developmental perspective (pp. 244–267). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L., Dornbusch, S. M., & Brown, B. B. (1992). Ethnic differences in adolescent achievement: An ecological perspective. American Psychologist, 47, 723–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toman, W. (1993). Family constellation: Its effects on personality and social behavior. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usher, E. L. (2007). Tracing the origins of confidence: A mixed methods exploration of the sources of self-efficacy beliefs in math. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

  • Usher, E. L. (2009). Sources of middle school students’ self-efficacy in mathematics: A qualitative investigation. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 275–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). Sources of self-efficacy in school: Critical review of the literature and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 78, 751–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L., & Cooper, H. (2005). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 39, 111–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., Leichtman, M. D., & White, S. H. (1998). Childhood memory and self-description in young Chinese adults: The impact of growing up an only child. Cognition, 69, 73–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidner, M. (2007). Test anxiety in educational contexts: Concepts, findings and future directions. In G. D. Phye, P. Schutz, & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 165–184). New York: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Goal setting: A key proactive source of academic self-regulation. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 367–395). New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zusho, A., Pintrich, P. R., & Cortina, K. S. (2005). Motives, goals, and adaptive patterns of performance in Asian American and Anglo American students. Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to acknowledge members of Shengjie Lin’s thesis committee Diane L. Schallert and Toni Falbo for helpful comments regarding the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shengjie Lin.

Additional information

This article is based on the master’s thesis work of Shengjie Lin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, S., Fong, C.J. & Wang, Y. Chinese undergraduates’ sources of self-efficacy differ by sibling status, achievement, and fear of failure along two pathways. Soc Psychol Educ 20, 361–386 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9367-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9367-0

Keywords

Navigation