Informal home education occurs without much that is generally considered essential for formal education—including curriculum, learning plans, assessments, age related targets or planned and deliberate teaching. Our research into families conducting this kind of education enables us to consider learning away from such imposed structures and to explore how children go about learning for themselves within the context of their own socio-cultural setting. In this paper we consider what and how children learn when no educational agenda is arranged for them and we link this manner of learning to the Deweyan ideas of learning as transactional and learning-in-context. We also use our empirical evidence to explore the notion of ZPD with regard to informal learning and to consider how children, without specific guidance, go about charting a course of learning through the ZPD. We consider the quality of informal learning particularly with regard to the educational aim of developing reflective and critical thinking, showing how these are integral to informal learning. We suggest that a much wider conception of what learning is and how it happens is needed, away from the confines of formal educational structures.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Our interest here lies not with judging the desirability of competing values, ethics and world views as they may be handed on to children within families. Whilst these matters may be considered integral to serious debates about mainstream education they stand on different ground in home education, abutting as they do with questions of civil liberties and the integrity of family life. In any case, this lies outside the scope of this paper in which we concentrate on the acquisition of knowledge, of certain capabilities and understandings.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2006). Beyond learning: Democratic education for a human future. Boulder, Co: Paradigm Publishers.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2009). Pragmatism’s contribution to understanding learning-in-context. In R. G. Edwards, G. J. J. Biesta, & M. Thorpe (Eds.), Rethinking contexts for learning and teaching: Communities, activities and networks (pp. 61–73). London: Routledge.
Brown, K. (1998). Education, culture and critical thinking. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
Carraher, T. N., Carraher, D. W., & Schliemann, A. D. (1985). Mathematics in the streets and in the schools. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3(1), 21–29.
Cole, M. (1998). Culture in development. In M. Woodhead, D. Faulkener, & K. Littleton (Eds.), Cultural worlds of early childhood (pp. 11–33). London: Routledge.
Eberhardt, N. (1979). Towards a cognitive approach to the study of culture acquisition. Washington, DC: Educational Resources Information Centre. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED172908).
Gauvain, M. (2001). The social context of cognitive development. New York: Guilford Press.
Hodkinson, P., Biesta, G. J. J., & James, D. (2008). Understanding learning culturally: Overcoming the dualism between social and individual views of learning. Vocations and Learning, 1(1), 27–47.
Ireson, J., & Blay, J. (1999). Constructing activity: Participation by adults and children. Learning and Instruction, 9(1), 19–36.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lines, P. M. (2001). Homeschooling. Eric Digest 151, September 2001. Retrieved February 18, 2011 from http://www.discovery.org/a/1068.
McCowan, T. (2009). A ‘seamless enactment’ of citizenship education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 43(1), 85–99.
Meighan, R. (1995). Home-based education effectiveness research and some of its implications. Educational Review, 47(3), 275–287.
Mitra, S., Dangwal, R., Chatterjee, S., Jha, S., Bisht, R. S., & Kapur, P. (2005). Acquisition of computer literacy on shared public computers: Children and the “hole in the wall”. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(3), 407–426.
Osberg, D. (2009). Enlarging the space of the possible” around what it means to educate and to be educated. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 6(1), iii–x.
Osberg, D., Biesta, G., & Cilliers, P. (2008). From representation to emergence: Complexity’s challenge to the epistemology of schooling. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 213–227.
Peim, N., & Flint, K. (2009). Testing times: Questions concerning assessment for school improvement. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41(3), 342–361.
Princiotta, D., & Bielick, S. (2006). Homeschooling in the United States: 2003 statistical analysis report (NCES 2006–042). Washington, DC: US Department of Education National Center for Educational Statistics.
Rothermel, P. (2004). Home education comparison of home and school educated children on PIPS baseline assessments. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 2(3), 273–299.
Rothermel, P. (2005). Can we classify motives for home education? Evaluation and Research in Education, 17(2–3), 74–89.
Standish, P. (1999). Education without aims? In R. Marples (Ed.), The aims of education (pp. 35–49). London: Routledge.
Super, C. M., & Harkness, S. (1998). The development of affect in infancy and early childhood. In M. Woodhead, D. Faulkener, & K. Littleton (Eds.), Cultural worlds of early childhood (pp. 34–47). London: Routledge.
Thomas, A. (1992). Individualised teaching. Oxford Review of Education, 18(1), 59–74.
Thomas, A. (1994). Conversational learning. Oxford Review of Education, 20(1), 131–142.
Thomas, A. (1998). Educating children at home. London: Continuum.
Thomas, A., & Pattison, H. (2008). How children learn at home. London: Continuum.
Tizard, B., & Hughes, M. (1984). Young children learning at home and in school. London: Fontana.
Trevarthen, C. (1995). The child’s need to learn a culture. In M. Woodhead, D. Faulkener, & K. Littleton (Eds.), Cultural worlds of early childhood (pp. 87–100). London: Routledge.
Ulmer, G. L. (1985). Applied grammatology: Post (e) pedagogy from Jacques Derrida to Joseph Beuys. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Wood, D. J., Wood, H. A., & Middleton, D. J. (1978). An experimental evaluation of four face-to-face teaching strategies. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 1(2), 131–147.
About this article
Cite this article
Thomas, A., Pattison, H. Informal Home Education: Philosophical Aspirations put into Practice. Stud Philos Educ 32, 141–154 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-012-9299-2
- Autonomous education
- Home education
- Informal learning