Studies in Philosophy and Education

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 53–66 | Cite as

Know Thyself: Macrocosm and Microcosm

  • Nigel TubbsEmail author


There was a time when, in the Liberal Arts, philosophy and education enjoyed the most intimate and productive relationship. Drawing together philosophy and nature they sought to understand the greatest of human mysteries. This meant thinking about both the macrocosm and the microcosm and especially the relation between them. In this relation lies the most fundamental vocation of Liberal Arts education—Know Thyself. In my article I attempt to retrieve the philosophical education that lies between the individual and the universe. I explore the macrocosm through Newton and Einstein, the microcosm through Heisenberg and Zizek, and the relation between them in the structure of the modern Kant/Hegel philosophical experience. The result—only relatively overambitious—is an educational theory of the uncertainty of the universe and everything in it.


Know thyself Hegel Liberal arts Nature 


  1. Abbinnett, R. (2010) ‘Review of Education in Hegel’ in Studies in Philosophy and Education, Volume 29, No. 1 January.Google Scholar
  2. Adorno, T. W. (1991). ‘Why Philosophy?’. In David Ingram & Julia Simon-Ingram (Eds.), Critical theory, the essential readings (eds ed.). New York: Paragon House.Google Scholar
  3. Aristotle, (1984) The Complete Works of Aristotle volume 1, ed. J. Barnes, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Hawking, S. (2005). A briefer history of time. London: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  5. Hegel, G. W. F. (1969). Science of logic. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  6. Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). Phenomenology of spirit. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Heisenberg, W. (1974). Across the frontiers. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  8. Heisenberg, W. (2000). Physics and philosophy. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  9. Kant, I. (1968). Critique of pure reason. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Newton, I. (2002). Principia. Philadelphia: Running Press.Google Scholar
  11. Sokal, A. (1996) ‘Transgressing the boundaries: Towards a transformative hermeneutics of quantum gravity,’ Social Text, Spring/Summer pp. 217–252; reprinted with annotations in Sokal (2008) Beyond the Hoax, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Tubbs, N. (2008). Education in Hegel. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  13. Tubbs, N. (2009). History of western philosophy. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wilbur, K. (2001). Quantum questions. Boston: Shambhala.Google Scholar
  15. Zizek, S. (1996). The indivisible remainder. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  16. Zizek, S. (1999). The ticklish subject. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationUniversity of WinchesterWinchesterUK

Personalised recommendations