Time category in Anton Chekhov’s deep poetics

Abstract

The paper suggests that the birth of an artwork (artistic world, image) as an open dynamic system can be described through the axiomatics of the theory of metabolic time. Alexander Levich’s theory of metabolic time and Nikolai Kozyrev’s theory of generated time flows, describing universal laws of the birth of the new, allow for the rethinking of the main categories of literature and aesthetics (time, space, traditions, rhythm, psychology of creativity and perception, etc.). The paper takes the rhythmic fractal as a natural referential unit of time in literature, as well as the analogue of the generating fluent in arts. The first part of the paper introduces Chekhov’s “depth poetics” through a body of research, addressing the problems of artistic creativity and the genesis of an artistic work as a new integral space–time unit. The second part of the paper brings “depth poetics” into a larger theoretical context: the theory of artistic creativity by Gej (Hudozhestvennost’ literatury. Poetika. Stil’. [The artistic quality in literature. Poetics. Style], Nauka Publ., Moscow, 1975) and the theory of metabolic time by Alexander Levich. The final part of the paper, “Rhythmic fractals,” draws the conclusion concerning the perspective of studying the wave nature of “generating fluent.” Using Chekhov’s play The Cherry Orchard as an illustrative example, the rhythmic fractal—“the sound of a burst string”—is considered. In Kozyrev’s formulation, it is the “compression of the flow.” The rhythmic source itself (standard fluent) is beyond the limits of the play and can only be found through an in-depth analysis of the neo-mythological structure of the Hamlet–Macbeth code.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    About the antinomy of art Gej wrote: “The imagined is not equal to the expressed, as the functions and qualities of figurative development of the world differ, but one thing necessarily needs the other” (Gej 1975, p. 156).

References

  1. Arkadyev, M. A. (1994). Kreativnoye vremya, ‘arkhepismo’ i opyt ‘Nichto’ [Creative time, ‘arche-writing’ and the experience of Nothing] Resource document. The Institute for Time Nature Explorations. http://www.chronos.msu.ru/old/RREPORTS/arkadyev_creatif.htm. Accessed 1 June 2020.

  2. Chekhov, A. P. (1977) Polnoe sobranie sochinenii i pisem: v 30 tomah. Pis’ma v 12 t. [Complete works and letters: In 30 vv. Letters: In 12 vv.]. Pis’ma [Letters] Vol. 5. Moskow: Nauka Publ.

  3. Chekhov, A. P. (1978). Polnoe sobranie sochinenii i pisem: v 30 tomah. Sochineniya [Complete works and letters: In 30 vv. Works: in 18 vv.]. Vol. 13 P’esy [Plays]. 1895–1904. Moskow: Nauka Publ.

  4. Chudakov, A. P. (1986). Mir Chekhova: Vozniknoveniye i utverzhdeniye. [Chekhov’s World: The emergence and the affirmation]. Moscow: Sovetskij pisatel Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Derman, A. B. (1959). O masterstve CHekhova. [On the mastery of Chekhov]. Moscow: Sovetskij pisatel’Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frye, N. (1971). Anatomy of criticism: Four essays. 1957. Princeton UP: Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gej, N. K. (1975). Hudozhestvennost’ literatury. Poetika. Stil’. [The artistic quality in literature. Poetics. Style]. Moscow: Nauka Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Girshman, M. M. (2017). Literaturnoe proizvedenie: teoriya hudozhestvennoj celostnosti. [Literary work: A theory of artistic value]. Moscow: Litres Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Heidegger, M. (1998). Prolegomeny k istorii ponyatiya vremeni. [History of the Concept of Time: Prolegomena]. http://society.polbu.ru/hajdegger_timeconcept/ch15_all.html. Accessed 1 June 2020.

  10. Kataev, V. B. (2002). Burevestnik Solenyj i dramaticheskie rifmy v “Trekh sestrakh” [Burevestnik Solenyi and dramatic rhymes in “Three sisters”]. In Chekhoviana: “Tri sestry”100 let [Chekhoviana: “Three sisters”—100 years] (pp. 120–128). Moscow: Nauka Publ.

  11. Kozyrev, N. A. (1971). On the possibility of experimental investigation of the properties of time. In Time in science and philosophy (pp. 111–132). Prague.

  12. Levich, A. P. (1996). Substitutional time of natural systems. Voprosy filosofii, 1, 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Levich, A. P. (1998). Vremya—substanciya ili relyaciya? Otkaz ot protivopostavleniya koncepcij [Is time a substance or a relation? Rejection of contrasting concepts. Filosofskie issledovaniya, (1):6–23.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Levich, A. P. (2008). O modelirovanii “potoka vremeni” [About ‘time flow’ modeling] In Vremya i zvezdy [Time and stars: to the 100th anniversary of N. A. Kozyrev] (pp. 489–544). St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya Publ.

  15. Lotman, Yu. M. (1998). Struktura hudozhestvennogo teksta [The structure of the literary text]. In Yu. M. Lotman (Ed.), Ob iskusstve [About art] (pp. 14–285). Saint-Petersburg: Art-SPb. Publ.

  16. Odesskaya, M. M. (2005). SHekspirovskie obrazy v “Vishnevom sade”” [Shakespeare’s images in “Cherry orchard”]. In CHekhoviana “Zvuk lopnuvshei struny”: k 100-letiiu p’esy “Vishnevyi sad” [Chekhoviana: “The Sound of a burst string”: The 100th anniversary of the play “Cherry orchard”] (pp. 494–505) Moscow: Nauka Publ.

  17. Pasternak B. L. (1990). Sobranie sochinenij. V 5-ti tomakh [Complete work in 5 vv.] Vol. 3. Doktor Zhivago: Novel. Moscow: KHudozhestvennaya literatura Publ.

  18. Peace, R. A. (1983). Chekhov. A study of the four major plays. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Podoroga, V. A. (1995). Fenomenologiya tela. Vvedenie v filosofskuyu antropologiyu [Phenomenology of the body. Introduction to philosophical anthropology. Materials of lecture courses 1992–1994]. Moscow: Ad Marginem Publ.

  20. Rzepka, C. J. (1984). Chekhov’s “The Three Sisters,” lear’s daughters, and the weird sisters: The Arcana of archetypal influence. Modern Language Studies. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3194348.

  21. Shakespeare, W., & Kroneberg, A. I. (1844). Makbet: Tragediia v piati deistviiakh. http://www.azlib.ru/k/kroneberg_a_i/text_0050oldorfo.shtml. Accessed 1 June 2020.

  22. Shalygina, O. V. (2010). Poetika. Kompoziciya. Vremya. [Poetics. Composition. Time. Moscow: Obrazovanie Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shalygina, O. V. (2016). Kino kak postizhenie literatury (“Kamen” A. Sokurova i khudozhestvennyi mir A.P. Chekhova). [Cinema as a comprehension of literature (“Stone” of A. Sokurov and artistic world of A. P. Chekhov)]. Vestnik slavianskikh kul’tur, 42(4), 163–173.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shalygina, O. V. (2019). Shakespeare’s codes in poetic prose. Transcultural Studies. https://doi.org/10.1163/23751606-01502006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shalygina, O. V. (2020). Makbetovskiy kod pozdnikh pyes Chekhova [Macbeth’s Code in Later plays by Anton Chekhov]. Vestnik slavianskikh kul’tur, (56):115–120. https://doi.org/10.37816/2073-9567-2020-56-115-120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vol’kenshtejn, V. M. (1929). Dramaturgiya: metod issledovaniya dramaticheskih proizvedenij. [Dramatic theory: Methods for studying dramatic pieces. Moscow: Federatsiya Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Winner, T. G. (1963). Myth as a device in the works of Chekhov. In: Frye, N., & Midwest Modern Language Association. (Eds.), Myth and symbol: Critical approaches and applications essays by N. Frye. (Vol. 141, pp. 71–73). University of Nebraska.

  28. Zelenskij V. V. (2009). Zdravstvuy, dusha! [Hello, soul! Works of various years]. Moscow: Cogito-Tsentr Publ. https://psy.wikireading.ru/25102. Accessed 24 May 2020.

Download references

Funding

The investigation was conducted at the A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences with the financial support of the Russian Science Foundation (RSF, the project № 17-18-01432-П).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olga Shalygina.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shalygina, O. Time category in Anton Chekhov’s deep poetics. Stud East Eur Thought 72, 253–267 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-020-09390-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Depth poetics
  • Ontology of the artistic rhythm
  • Theory of metabolic time
  • Methodology of interdisciplinary research