Abstract
The paper argues that Nikolai Berdyaev’s doctrine of theurgy has remained relevant in today’s cultural-historical context because it highlights a continuing problem in the philosophy of art. The problem is the misunderstanding of the ludic nature of art, its role in the evolution of consciousness and transformation of reality. The author questions the idea that artistic play is deficient compared with religious expression. As a result of this critique, he proposes that the theurgic quest for a radically new form of creativity was misguided and that the true meaning of the aspiration behind it is the need to comprehend culture as a dialectically articulated integral system of the cultural forms that constitute it.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Ilya Kabakov, The Man Who Flew into Space from his Apartment, see “Appendix”.
Solovyov’s aesthetic essays of the 1890s on “The General Meaning of Art” and “The First Step towards a Positive Aesthetic” (cf. Solovyov 1991, 73–89).
Danto spoke of the two belonging to distinct “logical orders” (Danto 1981, 84).
Bakhtin developed the theory of the fully independent voices of Dostoevsky’s characters in his 1929 essay Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics (Bakhtin 1984), where he advanced his interpretation of the writer as the creator of the polyphonic novel.
Hegel discusses Schiller in his Aesthetics (Hegel 1975, 1: 61–62), without any reference to play.
Danto argued that the great accomplishment of the late twentieth-century avant-garde consisted in bringing to light the fact that art’s essence was purely philosophical, i.e., unrelated to what Hegel called “the realization of the Idea in a sensuous medium” (cf. “The Art World Revisited,” in Danto 1992, 33–53).
For an analysis of Losev’s doctrine in the Problema simvola see Marchenkov (2018), 77–92.
References
Bakhtin, M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics, translated by C. Emerson. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies, translated by A. Lavers. New York: Nill and Wang.
Berdyaev, N. (1962). The meaning of the creative act, translated by D. A. Lowrie. New York: Collier Books.
Bychkov, V. (2007). Russkaia teurgicheskaia estetika [Russian Theurgic Aesthetics]. Moscow: Ladomir.
Danto, A. C. (1981). The transfiguration of the commonplace: A philosophy of art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Danto, A. C. (1992). Beyond the Brillo box: The visual arts in post-historical perspective. New York: Farrar, Straus, Grioux.
Dostoevsky, F. (1971–1990). Polnoe sobranie sochinenii [Complete Collected Works] (Vol. 30). Leningrad: Nauka, Leningradskoe otdelenie.
Evlampiev, I. (2017). Russkaia filosofiia v evropeiskom kontekste [Russian Philosophy in the European Context]. St. Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo RKhGA.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1975). Aesthetics: Lectures on fine arts (T. M. Knox, Trans.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). Phenomenology of spirit (A. V. Miller, Trans.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Losev, A. F. (1990). Vladimir Solovyov i ego vremia [Vladimir Solovyov and His Time]. Moscow: Progress.
Losev, A. F. (2003). The dialectics of myth (V. Marchenkov, Trans.). London: Routledge.
Losev, A. F. (2014). Problema simvola i realisticheskoe iskusstvo [The Problem of the Symbol and Realist Art], edited by A. A. Takho-Godi & V. P. Troitskii. Moscow: Russkii Mir.
Marchenkov, V. (2018). The continuing relevance of symbolist thought: The case of Clifford Geertz and Aleksei Losev. Slavic and East European Journal, 62(1), 77–92.
Marchenkov, V. (2019). Nikolai Berdyaev’s philosophy of creativity as a revolt against the modern worldview. In M. F. Bykova, L. Steiner, & M. N. Forster (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of Russian thought. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, (forthcoming)
Schiller, F. (1965). On the aesthetic education of man in a series of letters, translated by R. Snell. New York: Frederick Ungar Publ. Co.
Solovyov, V. (1991). Filosofiia iskusstva i literaturnaia Kritika [Philosophy of Art and Literary Criticism]. Moscow: Iskusstvo.
Zenkovsky, V. (2003). A history of Russian philosophy (Vol. 2), translated by G. Kline. London and New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.