Social Justice Research

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 122–139 | Cite as

Wild Justice Redux: What We Know About Social Justice in Animals and Why It Matters

Article

Abstract

Social justice in animals is beginning to attract interest in a broad range of academic disciplines. Justice is an important area of study because it may help explain social dynamics among individuals living in tightly-knit groups, as well as social interactions among individuals who only occasionally meet. In this paper, we provide an overview of what is currently known about social justice in animals and offer an agenda for further research. We provide working definitions of key terms, outline some central research questions, and explore some of the challenges of studying social justice in animals, as well as the promise of the work we're proposing. Finally, we suggest why continued research into animal cognition and social behavior has significant ethical implications for our treatment of nonhuman animals.

Keywords

Social justice Animals Wild justice Play Prosocial, captive Fairness Inequity aversion Ethics Empathy Cooperation Morality Primates Canids Cognitive ethology 

References

  1. Allen, C., & Bekoff, M. (1997). Species of mind: The philosophy and biology of cognitive ethology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ayala, F. (2010). The difference of being human: Morality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(Suppl 2), 9015–9022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bekoff, Marc. (1995). Play signals as punctuation: The structure of social play in canids. Behaviour, 132, 419–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bekoff, M. (1996). Cognitive ethology, vigilance, information gathering, and representation: Who might know what and why? Behavioural Processes, 35, 225–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bekoff, M. (2006). The public lives of animals: A troubled scientist, pissy baboons, angry elephants, and happy hounds. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 13, 115–131.Google Scholar
  6. Bekoff, M. (2007). The emotional lives of animals: A leading scientist explores animal joy, sorrow, and empathy, and why they matter. Novato, CA: New World Library.Google Scholar
  7. Bekoff, M. (2010). The animal manifesto: Six reasons for expanding our compassion footprint. Novato, CA: New World Library.Google Scholar
  8. Bekoff, M., & Byers, J. A. (1981). A critical reanalysis of the ontogeny and phylogeny of mammalian social and locomotor play: An ethological hornet’s nest. In K. Immelmann, G. Barlow, M. Main, & L. Petrinovich (Eds.), Behavioral development: The Bielefeld interdisciplinary project (pp. 296–337). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bekoff, M., & Byers, J. A. (Eds.). (1998). Animal play: Evolutionary, comparative and ecological perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bekoff, M., & Pierce, J. (2009). Wild justice: The moral lives of animals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ben-Ami Bartal, I., Decety, J., & Mason, P. (2011). Empathy and pro-social behavior in rats. Science, 334, 1427–1430.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bernstein, I. S. (1981). Dominance: The baby and the bathwater. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 4, 419–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bräuer, J., & Hanus, D. (2012). Social Justice Research (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  14. Brosnan, S. F. (2006). Nonhuman species’ reactions to inequity and their implications for fairness. Social Justice Research, 19(2), 153–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brosnan, S. F., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2003). Monkeys reject equal pay. Nature, 425, 297–299.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brosnan, S. F., Houser, D., Leimgruber, K., Xiao, E., Chen, T., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2010a). Competing demands of prosociality and equity in monkeys. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(4), 279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brosnan, S. F., Schiff, H., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2004). Tolerance for inequity may increase with social closeness in chimpanzees. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 1560, 253–258.Google Scholar
  18. Brosnan, S. F., Talbot, C., Ahlgren, M., Lambeth, S., & Shapiro, S. (2010). Mechanisms underlying responses to inequitable outcomes in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes. Animal Behaviour. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.02.019.
  19. Burghardt, G. (2005). The genesis of animal play: Testing the limits. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.Google Scholar
  20. Chen, J., & Houser, D. (2012). Social Justice Research (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  21. Christen, M., & Glock, H. (2012). Social Justice Research (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  22. Churchland, P. (2011). Braintrust. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Corning, P. (2011). The fair society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  25. Damasio, A. (2003). Looking for Spinoza: Joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  26. Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Dawkins, M. S. (2004). Using behaviour to assess animal welfare. Animal Welfare, 13, 51–57.Google Scholar
  28. Fagen, R. (1981). Animal play behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Gazzaniga, M. (2005). The ethical brain. New York: Dana Press.Google Scholar
  30. Greene, J., & Haidt, J. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 517–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316, 998–1002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hare, B. (2012, in preparation). A culture of compassion relies on a preference based approach to animal welfare. http://www.friendsofbonobos.org/research.htm.
  33. Hare, B., Rosati, A., Kaminski, J., Brauer, J., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2010). The domestication hypothesis for dogs’ skills with human communication: A response to Udell et al. (2008) and Wynne et al. (2008). Animal Behaviour, 79, e1–e6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Heinrich, B. (1999). Mind of the raven: Investigations and adventures with wolf-birds. New York: Cliff Street Books.Google Scholar
  35. Hinde, R. A. (2002). Why good is good: The sources of morality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Horowitz, A. (2012). Fair is fine, but more is better: Limits to inequity aversion in the domestic dog. Social Justice Research, 25(2). doi:10.1007/s11211-012-0158-7.
  37. Jensen, K., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Chimpanzees are rational maximizers in an ultimatum game. Science, 318, 107–109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Langford, D. J., Crager, S. E., Shehzad, Z., Smith, S. B., Sotocinal, S. G., Levenstadt, J. S., et al. (2006). Social modulation of pain is evidence of empathy in mice. Science, 312, 1967–1970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lehner, P. N. (1996). Handbook of ethological methods (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Miklosi, A. (2009). Dog behaviour, evolution, and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Montgomery, S. (2011, November/December). Deep intellect. Orion. (http://www.orionmagazine.org/index.php/articles/article/6474/).
  42. Neiworth, J. J., Johnson, E., Whillock, K., Greenberg, J., & Brown, V. (2009). Is a sense of inequity an ancestral primate trait? Testing social inequity in cotton top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 123(1), 10–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Olson, K. (2012). Social Justice Research (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  44. Peterson, D. (2011). The moral lives of animals. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
  45. Pierce, J., & Bekoff, M. (2012). Wild justice redux: What we know about social justice in animals and why it matters. Social Justice Research, 25(2). doi:10.1007/s11211-012-0154-y.
  46. Price, S. A., & Brosnan, S. F. (2012). To each according to his need? Variability in the responses to inequity in non-human primates. Social Justice Research, 25(2). doi:10.1007/s11211-012-0153-z.
  47. Raihani, N. J. & McAuliffe, K. (2012). Does inequity aversion motivate punishment? Cleaner fish as a model system. Social Justice Research, 25(2). doi:10.1007/s11211-012-0157-8.
  48. Range, F., Horn, L., Viranyi, Z., & Huber, L. (2008). The absence of reward induces inequity aversion in dogs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0810957105.
  49. Range, F., Leitner, K., & Virányi, Z. (2012). The influence of the relationship and motivation on inequity aversion in dogs. Social Justice Research, 25(2). doi:10.1007/s11211-012-0155-x.
  50. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Schaller, G. B., & Lowther, G. R. (1969). The relevance of carnivore behavior to the study of early hominids. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 25, 307–341.Google Scholar
  52. Skitka, L. (2012). Social Justice Research (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  53. Sussman, R. W., & Cloninger, C. R. (Eds.). (2011). Origins of altruism and cooperation. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  54. Sussman, R. W., Garber, P. A., & Cheverud, J. M. (2005). Importance of cooperation and affiliation in the evolution of primate sociality. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 128, 84–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Talbot, C. F., Freeman, H. D., Williams, L. E., & Brosnan, S. F. (2011). Squirrel monkeys’ response to inequitable outcomes indicates a behavioural convergence with the primates. Biology Letters, 7, 680–682.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thompson, P. R. (1975). A cross-species analysis of carnivore, primate, and hominid behaviour. Journal of Human Evolution, 4, 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tinbergen, N. (1972). The spotted hyena in Hans Kruuk. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  58. Tomasello, M., & Call, J. (2011). Methodological challenges in the study of primate cognition. Science, 334, 1227–1228.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. van Wolkenten, M., Brosnan, S. F., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2007). Inequity responses of monkeys modified by effort. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(47), 18854–18859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yamamoto, S., & Takimoto, A. (2012). Social Justice Research (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Bioethics and HumanitiesUniversity of Colorado Health SciencesDenverUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyThe University of ColoradoBoulderUSA
  3. 3.LyonsUSA

Personalised recommendations