The impact of social capital on individuals’ giving behavior has been widely studied, however, most of the existing literature considers charitable giving to be one form of prosocial behavior without further exploring donations to various charitable causes and fails to capture the shaping role of the state on individuals’ giving preferences. We draw on social capital literature and deploy the 2012 wave of the Chinese General Social Survey to examine to what extent the key social capital correlates, including social networks, norms of generalized reciprocity and trust affect individuals’ giving preferences and the amount given to six specific causes. Results indicate that the effect of social network on giving varies across causes greatly. Attending religious group has the highest explanatory power of giving to Religious cause. Being any associational membership are likely to give to Poverty cause, and individuals holding higher institutional trust give more , the charitable cause prioritized by the state’s political agenda and where donation is predominantly channeled through the state. Norm of generalized reciprocity is an important predictor of the decision to give to Neighborhood. Except for individuals attending community-based association donate higher amounts, others are relatively less likely to donate to the domain of Environmental issues, the newly emerged causes whereas still suppressed by the state. This study contributes a better understanding that individuals’ giving preferences are not only driven by social capital correlates, but shaped by the state’ structural intervention in various charitable domains, which also sheds lights on future studies that explore giving behaviors in other authoritarian regimes.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
With an exception of the period of Culture Revolution.
The first charitable foundation, the China Children and Teenagers’ Fund, was founded in 1981.
It worth noting that in the CGSS 2012 questionnaire there are nine types of associations, including (a) political association, (b) community association, (c) public association (voluntary association or nonprofit association), (d) entertainment club, (e) citizen’s movement association, (f) religious association, (g) alumni association, (h) labor union, and (i) professional association. For this study, we only include four types of associations.
By law, men retire at 60 while women retire at 50 in China. We use the mean retire age (= 55) as the second threshold of age categories in the analysis.
(1949a) Changzhi ganbu qunzhong juanqian zhumi jiuji yubei zaibao [Changzhi cadres and the public donate to help save rice and to aid the needy in the northern Henan] People’s Daily.
(1949b) Hebei guangda chengxiang pubian kaizhan jieyue jiuzai anzhi zaimin gongzuo zheng tuoshan jinxing [The vast urban and rural areas in Hebei province have carried out conservation and disaster relief, the resettlement of the victimes is being properly carried out]. People’s Daily.
(1950) Jiuzhu wanbei subei hebei henan zaimin hanyi quanmu zonghui chengli [Rescuing the victims of north Jiangsu, Hebei, Henan, the cold cloths fundraising group is being founded]. People’s Daily.
(1953) Summary of readers’ letters. People’s Daily.
AFP (2010) Charitable giving by type of community: Comparing donation patterns of rural and urban donors. Indiana University.
Andreoni, J., & Vesterlund, L. (2001). Which is the fair sex? Gender differences in Altruism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 293–312.
Andrews, R. (2009). Civic engagement, ethnic heterogeneity, and social capital in urban areas: Evidence from England. Urban Affairs Review, 44(3), 428–440.
Bekkers, R. (2003). Trust, accreditation, and philanthropy in the Netherlands. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(4), 596–615.
Bekkers R (2006) Traditional and Health-Related Philanthropy: The Role of Resources and Personality. Social Psychology Quarterly 68(4).
Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2011). Who gives? A literature review of predictors of charitable giving part one: Religion, education, age and socialisation. Voluntary Sector Review, 2(3), 337–365.
Bi, X., Jin, J., Ma, M., et al. (2010). The reach of Danwei mobilization: An analysis on urban residents’ charitable giving to Project Hope. Sociological Studies, 6, 149–177. (in Chinese).
Bian, Y., & Li, L. (2012). The Chinese general social survey (2003–8). Chinese Sociological Review, 45(1), 70–97.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood: New York, NY.
Brooks, A. (2006). Who really cares? The surprising truth about compassionate conservatism. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Brooks, A. C., & Lewis, G. B. (2001). Giving, volunteering, and mistrusting government. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20(4), 765–769.
Brown, E., & Ferris, J. M. (2007). Social capital and philanthropy: An analysis of the impact of social capital on individual giving and volunteering. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(1), 85–99.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.
Cox, J., Oh, E. Y., Simmons, B., et al. (2018). Getting connected: An empirical investigation of the relationship between social capital and philanthropy among online volunteers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly., 48(2_suppl), 151S–173S.
Cragg, J. G. (1971). Some statistical models for limited dependent variables with application to the demand for durable goods. Econometrica, 39(5), 829–844.
Deng, G. (2015). The influence of elite philanthropy on NGO development in China. Asian Studies Review, 39(4), 554–570.
Diop, A., Johnston, T., Le, K. T., et al. (2018). Donating time or money? The effects of religiosity and social capital on civic engagement in Qatar. Social Indicators Research, 138, 297–315.
Evers, A., & Gesthuizen, M. (2011). The impact of generalized and institutional trust on donating to activist, leisure, and interest organizations: individual and contextual effects. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 16, 381–392.
Fan, X. (2019). Discrimination experience, family relations, and generalized trust in China. Social Science Research, 77, 115–129.
Farrell, H., & Knight, J. (2003). Trust, institutions and institutional evolution: Industrial districts and the social capital hypothesis. Politics and Society, 31, 537–556.
FL4C (2011). Mianfei wucan [Free Lunch for Children]. Available at: http://www.mianfeiwucan.org/donate/charity-desktop/ (Accessed July).
Forbes, K. F., & Zampelli, E. M. (2010). An assessment of alternative structural models of philanthropic behavior. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(6), 1148–1167.
Garcia, B., & Williamsburg, V. (2013). Implementation of a double-hurdle model. The Stata Journal, 13(4), 776–794.
Gittell, R. & Tebaldi, E. (2006). Charitable giving: Factors influencing giving in U.S. States. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(4): 721–736.
Glanville, J. L., Paxton, P., & Wang, Y. (2015). Social capital and generosity: A multilevel analysis. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(3).
Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161.
Herzog, P. S., & Yang, S. (2018). Social networks and charitable giving: trusting, doing, asking, and alter primacy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(2), 376–394.
Ho, P. (2001). Greening without conflict? Environmentalism, NGOs and civil society in China. Development and Change, 32(5), 893–921.
Howell, J. (2007). Civil society in China: Chipping away at the edges. Development, 50, 17–23.
Hsu, C. L. (2009). ‘Rehabilitating Charity’ in China: The case of project hope and the rise of non-profit organizations. Journal of Civil Society, 4(2), 81–96.
Hustinx, L., Handy, F., Cnaan, R. A., et al. (2010). Social and cultural origins of motivations to volunteer–a comparison of university students in Six Countries. International Sociology, 25(3), 349–382.
Hustinx, L., Handy, F., & Cnaan, R. (2012). Student volunteering in China and Canada: Comparative perspectives. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 37, 55–83.
Irwin, K. (2009). Prosocial behavior across cultures: The effects of institutional versus generalized trust. In S. R. Thye & E. J. Lawler (Eds.), Altruism and prosocial behavior in groups (Advances in group processes volunme 26). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Jackson, E. F., Bachmeier, M. D., Wood, J. R., et al. (1995). Volunteering and charitable giving: Do religious and associational ties promote helping behavior? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 24(1), 59–78.
Johnson, P. D. & Saich, T. (2017) Values and vision: Perspectives on philanthropy in 21st century China. Reportno. Report Number, Date. Place Published: Institution.
Kang, X., & Han, H. (2008). Graduated controls—the state-society relationship in contemporary China. Modern China, 34(1), 36–55.
Leigh, A. (2006). Trust, inequality and ethnic heterogeneity. Economic Record, 82(258), 268–280.
Lelieveldt, H. (2004). Helping citizens help themseleves neighborhood improvement programs and the impact of social networks, trust, and norms on neighborhood-oriented forms of participation. Urban Affairs Review, 39(5), 531–551.
Lin, T.-C. (2007). Environmental NGOs and the anti-dam movements in China: a social movement with Chinese characteristics. Issues and Studies-English Edition, 43(4), 149.
Lin, W. (2019). Social capital and individual charitable behaviours in China. Applied Research in Quality of Life. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-019-09760-x.
Liu, C.-J. (2018). Expectation, commitment and charitable giving: The mediating role of trust and the moderating role of social status. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30, 754–767.
Liu, F., & Lu, W. (2013). Influence of social economical status upon charity donation behavior. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Science), 3, 113–120. (in Chinese).
Liu, L., & Ruan, R. (2018). Does religion make people more generous? Sourth China Journal of Economics, 11, 103–120. (in Chinese).
Lu, Y., Jung, J. H., & Bauldry, S. (2019). Explaining the cross-national variation in the relationship between religious organization membership and civic organization participation. Social Science Research, 83, 102310.
Lyons, B. R. (1994). Contracts and specific investment: An empirical test of transaction cost theory. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 3(2), 257–278.
Marsden, P. V., & Friedkin, N. E. (1993). Network Studies of Social Influence. Sociological Methods and Research, 22(1), 127–151.
McCarthy, S. K. (2013). Serving society, repurposing the state: Religious charity and resistance in China. The China Journal, 70, 48–72.
McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., & Chervany, N. L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 473–490.
Nieminen, T., Martelin, T., Koskinen, S., et al. (2008). Measurement and socio-demographic variation of social capital in a large population-based survey. Social Indicators Research, 85, 405–423.
Paxton, P. (1999). Is social capital declining in the United States? A Multiple Indicator Assessment American Journal of Sociology, 105(1), 88–127.
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65–78.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of american community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Read, B. L. (2008). Assessing variation in civil society organizations: China’s homeowner associations in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 41(9), 1240–1265.
Ren, Q., & Ye, M. (2017). Donation make people happier: Evidence from the Wenchuan Earthquake. Social Indicators Research, 132, 517–536.
Ryan, J., Chen, L. C., & Saich, T. (2014). Philanthropy for Health in China: Distinctive roots and future prospects. In J. Ryan, L. C. Chen, & T. Saich (Eds.), Philanthropy for Health in China (pp. 1–15). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Schervish, P. G., & Havens, J. J. (1997). Social participation and charitable giving: a multivariate analysis. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 8(3), 235–260.
Slyke, D. M. V., & Brooks, A. C. (2005). Why do people give? New evidence and strategies for nonprofit managers. American Review of Public Administration, 35(3), 199–222.
Spires, A. J. (2011). Contingent symbiosis and civil society in an authoritarian state: understanding the survival of China’s grassroots NGOs. American Journal of Sociology, 117(1), 1–45.
Steinhardt, H. C. (2012). How is high trust in China possible? Comparing the origins of generalized trust in three Chinese sociesties. Political Studies, 60, 4344–4454.
Tan, S. J., & Tamnyah, S. K. (2011). Generalized trust and trust in institutions in confucian Asia. Social Indicators Research, 103, 357–377.
Taniguchi, H., & Marshall, G. A. (2012). The effects of social trust and institutional trust on formal volunteering and charitable giving in Japan. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25, 150–175.
Tomba, L. (2014). The government next doo: Neighborhood politics in Urban China. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Vamstad, J., & Jv, E. (2012). Charitable giving in a universal welfare state—charity and social rights in Sweden. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(2), 285–301.
Wang, L., & Graddy, E. (2008). Social capital, volunteering and charitable giving. Volunta: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 19, 23–42.
Wang, L., & Handy, F. (2013). Religious and secular voluntary participation by immigrants in Canada: How trust and social networks affect decision to participate. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9428-8.
Wang, X., Liu, F., Nan, F., et al. (2015). Giving in China: An emerging nonprofit sector embedded within a strong state. In P. Wiepking & F. Handy (Eds.), The palgrave handbook of global philanthropy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wiepking, P. (2010). Democrats support international relief and the upper class donates to art? How opportunity, incentives and confidence affect donations to different types of charitable organizations. Social Science Research, 39(6), 1073–1087.
Wiepking, P., & Maas, I. (2009). Resources that make you generous: effects of social and human resources on charitable giving. Social Forces, 87(4), 1973–1995.
Willer, R., Wimer, C., & Owens, L. A. (2015). What drives the gender gap in charitable giving? Lower empathy leads men to give less to poverty relief. Social Science Research, 52, 83–98.
Wong, L. (1994). Privatization of Social Welfare in Post-Mao China. Asian Survey, 34(4), 307–325.
Wu, S.-Y., Huang, J.-T., & Kao, A.-P. (2004). An analysis of the peer effects in charitable giving: The case of Taiwan. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 25(4), 483–505.
Wu, X. (2013). Redrawing the boundaries: Work units and social stratification in urban China. Chinese Sociological Review, 45(4), 6–28.
Wu, Z., Zhao, R., Zhang, X., et al. (2018). The impact of social capital on volunteering giving: Evidence from urban China. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764018784761.
Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United State and Japn. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 129–166.
Yan, M. C., Huang, X., Foster, K., et al. (2007). Charity development in China an overview. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 17(1), 79–94.
Zhao, R., Wu, Z., & Tao, C. (2016). Understanding Service Contracting and Its Impact on NGO Development in China. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27, 2229–2251.
Zhou, Q., & Zeng, G. (2006). Zhongguo Cishan Jianshi [A brief history of philanthropy in China]. Beijing: Renmin Publisher.
The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and thoughtful suggestions.
This work was supported by the Key Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of the People’s Republic of China “Research on Organization and Model of Modern Social Governance” (71533002)and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University (63202006).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Gong, X., Ye, S. Social Capital, the State’s Structural Intervention and Donors’ Choice Among Charitable Causes: Evidence from China. Soc Indic Res (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02609-7
- Charitable giving
- Individuals’ preference to give
- Charitable causes
- Social capital
- Structural intervention by the state