Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Revisiting Declines in Social Capital: Evidence from a New Measure

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the late twentieth century, researchers began calling attention to declining social capital in America and the potential consequences of this trend for a healthy society. While researchers empirically assessed the decline in social capital from the mid-1900s onward, this line of research diminished when the major source of data, the General Social Survey, stopped fielding critical questions in 2004. We do not know, therefore, whether social capital, especially associational social capital, has declined, stabilized, or even increased in a twentyfirst century America. In this paper, we develop a new measure of associational social capital using a confirmatory factor analysis of six indicators from the Civic Engagement Supplement to the Current Population Survey for 2008–2011 and 2013. Our findings support previous research suggesting that associational social capital does not seem to be declining over time. However, we do find evidence of a nonlinear decrease in associating during the Great Recession years. Across the entire time period, though, membership in groups has not declined and there has been little practical change in the amount of time that individuals spend with neighbors. Our analysis of the variance of social capital also shows no general change in the national dispersion of social capital from 2008 to 2013. The paper advances the measurement of social capital and updates our understanding of its possible decline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Measures in Europe tend to use the World Values Survey and the European Values Survey (e.g., Sarracino and Mikucka 2017; Bjørnskov and Sønderskov 2013).

  2. Unfortunately, questions on generalized trust were not available in the Current Population Survey. Single years have questions on trust in neighbors and confidence in a few institutions (corporations, the media, and public schools) but these are not available in 2008, 2009 and 2010. So we are unable to include an additional factor to measure trust or analyze recent trends in trust.

  3. We use modification indices to assess if the fit of our model would improve by correlating the errors between any pair of measured variables. Results demonstrate that including any additional correlations beyond those already present does not substantially improve model fit.

  4. The study of trends in social capital is not solely confined to the American context (e.g., Sarracino and Mikucka 2017).We argue, however, that sustained interest in declines in social capital in the United States is a good justification for choosing it as a focal country in the exploration of our new measure. Future research in other countries should similarly take up the call to investigate trends in associational social capital along with other dimensions of social capital. An international and comparative approach would contribute significantly to general theories on how macro-level institutional contexts can help or hinder the growth of associational social capital while controlling for cultural differences.

References

  • Adger, W. N. (2003). Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change. Economic Geography, 79(4), 387–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, D. P., & Meyer, M. A. (2015). Social capital and community resilience. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(2), 254–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2000). Participation in heterogeneous communities. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 847–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arezzo, M. F. (2014). Social capital and undeclared work: An empirical analysis in Italy from 1998 to 2008. Social Indicators Research, 118(2), 695–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arezzo, M. F., & Giudici, C. (2017). The effect of social capital on health among European older adults: An instrumental variable approach. Social Indicators Research, 134(1), 153–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becchetti, L., Pelloni, A., & Rossetti, F. (2008). Relational goods, sociability and happiness. Kyklos, 61(3), 343–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørnskov, C. (2006). The multiple facets of social capital. European Journal of Political Economy, 22(1), 22–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørnskov, C., & Sønderskov, K. M. (2013). Is social capital a good concept? Social Indicators Research, 114(3), 1225–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). Forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 999–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. A. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpiano, R. M. (2007). Neighborhood social capital and adult health: an empirical test of a Bourdieu-based model. Health Place, 13(3), 639–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpiano, R. M. (2008). Actual or potential neighborhood resources and access to them: Testing Hypotheses of social capital for the health of female caregivers. Social Science and Medicine, 67(4), 568–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. K. (2015). Rethinking the decline in social capital. American Politics Research, 43(4), 569–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. K., & Eisenstein, M. A. (2013). Interpersonal trust: An age–period–cohort analysis revisited. Social Science Research, 42(2), 361–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS). (2017). Volunteering and civic life in America. Retrieved July 1, 2018, from https://cncs.data.socrata.com/Volunteering-and-Civic-Engagement/Volunteering-and-Civic-Life-in-America/spx3-tt2b.

  • Costa, D. L., & Kahn, M. E. (2003). Civic engagement and community heterogeneity: An economist’s perspective. Perspectives on Politics, 1(1), 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Tocqueville, A. (1835). Democracy in America. London: Saunders and Otley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichstaedt, J. C., Schwartz, H. A., Kern, M. L., Park, G., Labarthe, D. R., Merchant, R. M., et al. (2015). Psychological language on Twitter predicts county-level heart disease mortality. Psychological Science, 26(2), 159–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engbers, T. A., Thompson, M. F., & Slaper, T. F. (2017). Theory and measurement in social capital research. Social Indicators Research, 132, 537–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flood, S., King, M., Ruggles, S., & Warren, R. J. (2017). Integrated public use microdata series, Current Population Survey: Verzion 5.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota. https://doi.org/10.18128/D030.V5.0.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guagnano, G., Santarelli, E., & Santini, I. (2016). Can social capital affect subjective poverty in Europe? An empirical analysis based on a generalized ordered logit model. Social Indicators Research, 128(2), 881–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, C., Tappeiner, G., & Walde, J. (2007). The learning region: The impact of social capital and weak ties on innovation. Regional Studies, 41(1), 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joint Economic Committee. (2017). What we do together: The State of Associational Life in America. Retrieved July 1, 2018, from https://www.lee.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/b5f224ce-98f7-40f6-a814-8602696714d8/what-we-do-together.pdf.

  • Kaasa, A. (2009). Effects of different dimensions of social capital on innovative activity: Evidence from Europe at the regional level. Technovation, 29(3), 218–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. The Quarterly Journal of eEonomics, 112(4), 1251–1288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, E. C. (1996). The data just don’t show erosion of America’s social capital. Public Perspective, 7(4), 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, E. W. (1987). The crisis of political legitimacy: What is it; Who’s got it; Who needs it. Research in Political Sociology, 3(1), 203–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Yuval. (2016). The fractured republic: Renewing America’s social contract in the age of individualism. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. (2002). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M., & Schneider, W. (1983). The confidence gap. Commentary, 76(4), 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B. O. (1989). Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous populations. Psychometrika, 54(4), 557–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Painter, M. A., & Paxton, P. (2014). Checkbooks in the Heartland: Change over time in voluntary association membership. Sociological Forum, 29(2), 408–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paxton, P. (1999). Is social capital declining in the United States? A multiple indicator assessment. American Journal of Sociology, 105(1), 88–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paxton, P. (2002). Social capital and democracy: An interdependent relationship. American Sociological Review, 67(2), 254–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paxton, P. (2007). Association memberships and generalized trust: A multilevel model across 31 countries. Social Forces, 86(1), 47–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pichler, F., & Wallace, C. (2007). Patterns of formal and informal social capital in Europe. European Sociological Review, 23(4), 423–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portela, M., Niera, I., & del Mar Salinas-Jiménez, M. (2013). Social capital and subjective wellbeing in Europe: A new approach on social capital. Social Indicators Research, 114(2), 493–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prewitt, K., Mackie, C. D., & Habermann, H. (Eds.). (2014). Civic engagement and social cohesion: Measuring dimensions of social capital to inform policy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puntscher, S., Hauser, C., Walde, J., & Tappeiner, G. (2015). The impact of social capital on subjective well-being: A regional perspective. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(5), 1231–1246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D., & Campbell, D. E. (2010). American grace: How religion unites and divides us. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. (2011). Toward a political theory of philanthropy. Giving well: The ethic of philanthropy (pp. 177–195). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rocco, L., & Suhrcke, M. (2012). Is social capital good for health? A European perspective (p. 16). Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rönnerstrand, B. (2014). Social capital and immunization against the 2009 A(H1N1) pandemic in the American States. Public Health, 128(8), 709–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotolo, T. (1999). Trends in voluntary association participation. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(2), 199–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupasingha, A., Goetz, S. J., & Freshwater, D. (2006). The production of social capital in US counties. Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(1), 83–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarracino, F., & Mikucka, M. (2017). Social capital in Europe from 1990 to 2012: Trends and convergence. Social Indicators Research, 131(1), 407–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satora, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference Chi square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwadel, P., & Stout, M. (2012). Age, period and cohort effects on social capital. Social Forces, 91(1), 233–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scrivens, K., & Smith, C. (2013). Four interpretations of social capital: An agenda for measurement. OECD Statistical Working Papers 2013(06). Paris: OECD Publishing.

  • Seminar, S. (2001). Social capital community benchmark survey: Executive summary. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). The measurement of economic performance and social progress revisited: reflections and overview. Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, Paris.

  • Shaker, L. (2014). Dead newspapers and citizens’ civic engagement. Political Communication, 31(1), 131–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1903). The metropolis and mental life. In The sociology of Georg Simmel (trans: Wolff, K. H.) (pp. 409–424). New York: Free Press.

  • Skocpol, T. (1999). Advocates without members: The recent transformation of American civic life. Civic Engagement in American Democracy, 461, 498–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smidt, C. E. (Ed.). (2003). Religion as social capital: Producing the common good. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J. H. (1980). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA, May 1980.‏

  • Stein, M. (1960). The eclipse of community. An interpretation of American studies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, J. S. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R., & Plewes, T. J. (2013). Nonresponse in social science surveys: A research agenda. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18293.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J. M., Campbell, W. K., & Carter, N. T. (2014). Declines in trust in others and confidence in institutions among American adults and late adolescents, 1972–2012. Psychological Science, 25(10), 1914–1923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oorschot, W., & Arts, W. (2005). The social capital of European welfare states: The crowding out hypothesis revisited. Journal of European Social Policy, 15(1), 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B., Carrington, P. J., & Hall, A. (1997). Networks as personal communities. Contemporary Studies in Sociology, 15, 130–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteley, P. F. (2000). Economic growth and social capital. Political Studies, 48(3), 443–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes, R. (2011). Re-thinking the decline in trust: A comparison of black and white Americans. Social Science Research, 40(6), 1596–1610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, L. (1938). Urbanism as a way of life. American Journal of Sociology, 44(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, J. (1999). Communities, networks, and the future of philanthropy. In C. T. Clotfelter & T. Ehrlich (Eds.), Philanthropy and the nonprofit sector in a changing America (pp. 229–247). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, R. (2004). Saving America? Faith-based services and the future of civil society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support of grants from the Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS) (201502185 PI: Paxton) and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24 HD42849, PI: Mark Hayward; T32 HD007081-35, PI: R. Kelly Raley) to the Population Research Center at the University of Texas at Austin.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Population Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin, 305 E 23rd St, A1700, CLA 3.306, Austin, TX, 78712-1086, USA

    Inbar Weiss, Pamela Paxton, Kristopher Velasco & Robert W. Ressler

Authors
  1. Inbar Weiss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pamela Paxton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kristopher Velasco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Robert W. Ressler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Inbar Weiss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weiss, I., Paxton, P., Velasco, K. et al. Revisiting Declines in Social Capital: Evidence from a New Measure. Soc Indic Res 142, 1015–1029 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1956-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1956-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation