Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Application of Big Data and Analytic Network Process for the Adaptive Reuse Strategies of School Land

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most recent discussion of the adaptive reuse of school land has focused almost exclusively on repurposing or redeploying vacant school space rather than comprehensively re-planning and constructing the entire school land for the overall needs of society and urban development. The relevant government agencies for school land reuse in Taiwan, such as the Ministry of Education and municipal governments, mostly provide subjective regulations or revitalization provisions for the sustainable development of school resources; however, no specific scientific assessment or a planning procedure has been proposed to revitalize school land. Therefore, constructing a scientific, quantitative, and objective planning framework and procedure is necessary for the adaptive reuse of school land based on the needs of overall society and urban development in order to replace the existing and outdated planning philosophy and to correct prominent shortcomings of past planning operations that were solely in accordance with the qualitative judgment and decision making of official agencies. In this study, we mainly adopted the analytic network process (ANP) and big data, including demographics, facility usage, and social welfare indicators, to assist the Taipei City government to construct or reform land reuse strategies for junior high and elementary schools facing immediate or future closure, consolidation, or downsizing. To take a more realistic approach to improve final decision making, the investigation of expert questionnaires through the ANP was based on the consideration of future trends that were objectively evaluated by big datasets. The novel planning philosophy and concise decision framework for reuse strategies we designed are expected to improve public decision-making transparency, adaptive reuse effectiveness, and quality of urban life. Ultimately, our proposed strategies and suggestions can not only assist local public sectors to promote the policy of adaptive reuse of surplus school lands but also serve as an appropriate blueprint of urban sustainability for the central government in the near future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aravot, I. (1996). Integration of future users’ evaluations into the process of urban revitalization. Evaluation and Program Planning, 19(1), 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asosheh, A., Nalchigar, S., & Jamporazmey, M. (2010). Information technology project evaluation: An integrated data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(8), 5931–5938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badri, M. A., Davis, D., & Davis, D. (2001). A comprehensive 0–1 goal programming model for project selection. International Journal of Project Management, 19(4), 243–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M. (2012). Building a science of cities. Cities, 29, S9–S16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M. (2013). Big data, smart cities and city planning. Dialogues in Human Geography, 3(3), 274–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biørn, E. (2017). Econometrics of Panel Data: Methods and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Börjeson, L., Höjer, M., Dreborg, K.-H., Ekvall, T., & Finnveden, G. (2006). Scenario types and techniques: Towards a user’s guide. Futures, 38(7), 723–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullen, P. A., & Love, P. E. (2010). The rhetoric of adaptive reuse or reality of demolition: Views from the field. Cities, 27(4), 215–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buttoud, G. (2000). How can policy take into consideration the “full value” of forests? Land Use Policy, 17(3), 169–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çevik, S., Vural, S., Tavşan, F., & Aşık, Ö. (2008). An example to renovation–revitalization works in historical city centres: Kunduracılar Street/Trabzon-Turkey. Building and Environment, 43(5), 950–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y.-H., Wey, W.-M., & Tseng, H.-Y. (2009). Using ANP priorities with goal programming for revitalization strategies in historic transport: A case study of the Alishan Forest Railway. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 8682–8690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapple, K., Jackson, S., & Martin, A. J. (2010). Concentrating creativity: The planning of formal and informal arts districts. City, Culture and Society, 1(4), 225–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, K.-T., & Kwon, C.-S. (2004). Hierarchies with dependence of technological alternatives: A cross-impact hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 420–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couch, C., & Dennemann, A. (2000). Urban regeneration and sustainable development in Britain: The example of the Liverpool Ropewalks Partnership. Cities, 17(2), 137–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, J. (1989). Introduction to grey system theory. The Journal of Grey System, 1, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, J. (2010). Introduction to grey mathematical resource science. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science & Technology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, M., Banerjee, S., & Husain, Z. (2007). Untapped demand for heritage: A contingent valuation study of Prinsep Ghat. Calcutta. Tourism Management, 28(1), 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. (2012). Big data and their epistemological challenge. Philosophy & Technology, 25(4), 435–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francesco, T., & Pierluigi, M. (2017). Evaluation of vacant and redundant public properties and risk control: A model for the definition of the optimal mix of eligible functions. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 35(1), 75–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, E. D. G., Dougill, A. J., Mabee, W. E., Reed, M., & McAlpine, P. (2006). Bottom up and top down: Analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 78(2), 114–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helleman, G., & Wassenberg, F. (2004). The renewal of what was tomorrow’s idealistic city. Amsterdam’s Bijlmermeer high-rise. Cities, 21(1), 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, M., & Kuk, G. (2016). The challenges and limits of big data algorithms in technocratic governance. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 371–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, J., & Zhao, H. (2012). Application of improved grey model in long-term load forecasting of power engineering. Systems Engineering Procedia, 3, 85–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayacan, E., Ulutas, B., & Kaynak, O. (2010). Grey system theory-based models in time series prediction. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(2), 1784–1789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchin, R. (2013). Big data and human geography opportunities, challenges and risks. Dialogues in human geography, 3(3), 262–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchin, R. (2014). The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal, 79(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchin, R., Lauriault, T. P., & McArdle, G. (2015). Knowing and governing cities through urban indicators, city benchmarking and real-time dashboards. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2(1), 6–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleine, A. (2004). A general model framework for DEA. Omega, 32(1), 17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, J. K., Kuo, C. J., & Cheng, H. Y. (2007). A study of developing rural tourism as a strategy for local revitalization. Journal of Tourism Studies, 13(1), 23–45. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyparisis, G. J., Gupta, S. K., & Ip, C.-M. (1996). Project selection with discounted returns and multiple constraints. European Journal of Operational Research, 94(1), 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, S.-K., & Huang, J.-Y. (2017). Theoretical foundation of a decision network for urban development. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 18(8), 1033–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, M., & Gregory, M. (1997). Industrial concerns in technology selection. In Proceedings of the Portland international conference on management of engineering and technology.

  • Langston, C., Wong, F. K., Hui, E. C., & Shen, L. Y. (2009). Strategic assessment of building adaptive reuse opportunities in Hong Kong. Building and Environment, 43(10), 1709–1718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y.-H., Tsai, K.-M., Shiang, W.-J., Kuo, T.-C., & Tsai, C.-H. (2009). Research on using ANP to establish a performance assessment model for business intelligence systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 4135–4146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S., & Lin, Y. (2006). Grey information: Theory and practical applications. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S., & Lin, Y. (2010). Grey systems: Theory and applications. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Peng, H., Bai, Y., Zhu, Y., & Liao, L. (2014). Tourism flows prediction based on an improved grey GM(1,1) Model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 138, 767–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S., Yang, Y., & Forrest, J. (2017). Grey data analysis: Methods, models and applications. Singapore: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maclaren, V. W. (1996). Urban Sustainability Reporting. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(2), 184–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. (1998). Automatic neighbourhood identification from population surfaces. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 22(2), 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins, M. J. F., Puckett, T. M., Lockwood, R., Swaddle, J. P., & Hunt, G. (2018). High male sexual investment as a driver of extinction in fossil ostracods. Nature, 556(7701), 366–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCool, S. F., & Martin, S. R. (1994). Community attachment and attitudes toward tourism development. Journal of Travel Research, 32(3), 29–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mese, M. (1998). Rural community revitalization by using regional resources and development of participatory planning method (SS method). Okayama University Scientific Reports of the Faculty of Agriculture, 87, 215–225. (In Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, H. (2009). Policy analytical capacity and evidence-based policy-making: Lessons from Canada. Canadian Public Administration, 52(2), 153–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, M., & Dalkmann, H. (2001). Decision making and strategic environmental assessment. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 03(03), 305–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. L. (2004). Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 40(7), 721–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phipps, A. G. (2008). Reuses of closed schools in Windsor, Ontario. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 42(1), 18–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raco, M. (2003). Assessing the discourses and practices of urban regeneration in a growing region. Geoforum, 34(1), 37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razzu, G. (2005). Urban redevelopment, cultural heritage, poverty and redistribution: the case of Old Accra and Adawso House. Habitat International, 29(3), 399–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (2005). Theory and applications of the analytic network process: Decision making with benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks. Pittsburgh: RWS publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (2007). Time dependent decision-making; dynamic priorities in the AHP/ANP: Generalizing from points to functions and from real to complex variables. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(7), 860–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (2013). Analytic network process. In S. I. Gass & M. C. Fu (Eds.), Encyclopedia of operations research and management science (pp. 64–72). Boston: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L., & Ozdemir, M. (2003). Negative priorities in the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 37(9), 1063–1075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L., & Sodenkamp, M. (2010). The analytic hierarchy and analytic network measurement processes: The measurement of intangibles. In C. Zopounidis & P. M. Pardalos (Eds.), Handbook of multicriteria analysis (pp. 91–166). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L., & Takizawa, M. (1986). Dependence and independence: From linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks. European Journal of Operational Research, 26(2), 229–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sairinen, R., & Kumpulainen, S. (2006). Assessing social impacts in urban waterfront regeneration. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26(1), 120–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steigenberger, N., Lübcke, T., Fiala, H., & Riebschläger, A. (2017). Decision modes in complex task environments. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Turkoglu, H. (2015). sustainable development and quality of urban life. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 202, 10–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ünlü, A. (2010). Urban regeneration, renewal or rehabilitation what for and for whom? Open House International, 35(4), 51–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, F. W., Joder, T. E., & Mumphrey, A. J. (Eds.). (1995). Urban revitalization: Policies and programs. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W.-M., Lee, A. H. I., & Chang, D.-T. (2010). An integrated FDM–ANP evaluation model for sustainable development of housing community. Optimization Letters, 4(2), 239–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W. M. & Wu, Z. L. (2008). A Preliminary Exploration for the assessment modeling of revitalizing and regenerating alternatives on the region with historical heritage. In Proceedings of the 2008 conference on science technology & society (In Chinese).

  • Wedding, G. C., & Crawford-Brown, D. (2007). Measuring site-level success in brownfield redevelopments: A focus on sustainability and green building. Journal of Environmental Management, 85(2), 483–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, G. (2017). Scale: The universal laws of growth, innovation, sustainability, and the pace of life in organisms, cities, economies, and companies. New York: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wey, W.-M., & Wu, K.-Y. (2007). Using ANP priorities with goal programming in resource allocation in transportation. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(7), 985–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijnmalen, D. J. D. (2007). Analysis of benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks (BOCR) with the AHP–ANP: A critical validation. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(7), 892–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M. C. (2002). Local cultural industry and local revitalization, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Graduate Institute of Urban Planning in National Taipei University, Taipei. (In Chinese)

  • Yu, J.-H., & Kwon, H.-R. (2011). Critical success factors for urban regeneration projects in Korea. International Journal of Project Management, 29(7), 889–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoffer, J., Bahurmoz, A., Hamid, M. K., Minutolo, M., & Saaty, T. (2008). Synthesis of complex criteria decision making: A case towards a consensus agreement for a middle east conflict resolution. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17(5), 363–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank anonymous referees and the Editor of the journal for constructive comments and suggestions. The authors also wish to acknowledge Jun-Hui Xie for his participation in data collection and analysis activities. Finally, the authors would like to express their appreciations to Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) of Taiwan and National Taipei University (NTPU) for the support of the projects: MOST 104-2410-H-305-077-MY3, MOST 106-2811-H-305-004, and 107-NTPU_A-H&E-143-001. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not represent the official policy or positions of the MOST and NTPU.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wann-Ming Wey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, JY., Wey, WM. Application of Big Data and Analytic Network Process for the Adaptive Reuse Strategies of School Land. Soc Indic Res 142, 1075–1102 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1951-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1951-y

Keywords

Navigation