Skip to main content
Log in

Cross-Country Assessment of Systemic Risk in the European Stock Market: Evidence from a CoVaR Analysis

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work is intended to assess the contribution to systemic risk of major companies in the European stock market on a geographical basis. We use the EuroStoxx 50 Index as a proxy for the financial system and we rely on the CoVaR and \(\varDelta\)-CoVaR risk measures to estimate the contribution of each European country belonging to the index to systemic risk. We also conduct the significance and dominance test to evaluate whether the systemic relevance of considered countries is statistically significant and to determine which nation exerts the greatest influence on the spreading of negative spillover effects on the entire economy. Our empirical results show that, for the period ranging from 2008 to 2017, all countries contribute significantly to systemic risk, especially in times of crisis and high volatility in the markets. Moreover, it emerges that France is the systemically riskiest country, followed by Germany, Italy, Spain and Netherlands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abadie, A. (2002). Bootstrap tests for distributional treatment effects in instrumental variable models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97(457), 284–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acharya, V. V., Pedersen, L. H., Philippon, T., & Richardson, M. (2017). Measuring systemic risk. The Review of Financial Studies, 30(1), 2–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adrian, T., & Brunnermeier, M. K. (2016). CoVaR. The American Economic Review, 106(7), 1705–1741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Algieri, B., & Leccadito, A. (2017). Assessing contagion risk from energy and non-energy commodity markets. Energy Economics, 62, 312–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, A. (2016). Systemic importance of insurance companies–An empirical analysis. Social Science Research Network. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2741068.

  • Bernal, O., Gnabo, J. Y., & Guilmin, G. (2014). Assessing the contribution of banks, insurance and other financial services to systemic risk. Journal of Banking and Finance, 47, 270–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardi, M., Gayraud, G., Petrella, L., et al. (2015). Bayesian tail risk interdependence using quantile regression. Bayesian Analysis, 10(3), 553–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardi, M., Durante, F., Jaworski, P., Petrella, L., & Salvadori, G. (2018). Conditional risk based on multivariate hazard scenarios. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 32(1), 203–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardi, M., Maruotti, A., & Petrella, L. (2017). Multiple risk measures for multivariate dynamic heavy-tailed models. Journal of Empirical Finance, 43, 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownlees, CT., & Engle, RF. (2012). Volatility, correlation and tails for systemic risk measurement. Social Science Research Network. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1611229.

  • Castro, C., & Ferrari, S. (2014). Measuring and testing for the systemically important financial institutions. Journal of Empirical Finance, 25, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, S. K., Härdle, W. K., & Wang, W. (2015). Quantile regression in risk calibration. In Handbook of financial econometrics and statistics, Berlin: Springer (pp 1467–1489).

  • Gauthier, C., Lehar, A., & Souissi, M. (2012). Macroprudential capital requirements and systemic risk. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 21(4), 594–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girardi, G., & Ergün, A. T. (2013). Systemic risk measurement: Multivariate GARCH estimation of CoVaR. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(8), 3169–3180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenker, R. (2005). Quantile Regression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koenker, R., & Bassett, G. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 46(1), 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B. Y., Ji, Q., & Fan, Y. (2017). Dynamic return-volatility dependence and risk measure of covar in the oil market: A time-varying mixed copula model. Energy Economics, 68, 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Espinosa, G., Moreno, A., Rubia, A., & Valderrama, L. (2012). Short-term wholesale funding and systemic risk: A global CoVaR approach. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36(12), 3150–3162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lum, K., Gelfand, A. E., et al. (2012). Spatial quantile multiple regression using the asymmetric laplace process. Bayesian Analysis, 7(2), 235–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lea Petrella.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Petrella, L., Laporta, A.G. & Merlo, L. Cross-Country Assessment of Systemic Risk in the European Stock Market: Evidence from a CoVaR Analysis. Soc Indic Res 146, 169–186 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1881-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1881-8

Keywords

Navigation