Advertisement

Economic Growth, Inequality and Poverty in the EU

  • Anton Michálek
  • Ján Výbošťok
Article
  • 315 Downloads

Abstract

A country’s poverty rate is influenced by numerous factors, including economic growth and the distribution of its effects. This article aims to classify European Union (EU) member states in terms of their ability to handle the economic challenges of the past decade. A country’s ability to negotiate global challenges in conjunction with their respective social and economic growth, as well as that of the EU, represents a key classification attribute. In this article, classification is based on an analysis of changes in economic growth, inequality and poverty across all 28 EU member states. The classification emerges from monitoring trends in economic growth and inequality, and their interconnections with poverty across the different countries. In order to analyse these interactions, this investigates uses the Bourguignon model (Poverty-Growth-Inequality Triangle–PGI) and the Growth Incidence Curve. The article reveals that economic growth is connected with a decrease in poverty. However, as inequalities in income increase, poverty also increases. Nevertheless, rates of development differ across countries. Four broad categories of country sharing similar attributes are defined, and an additional, special category assigned to Greece owing to its distinctive attributes. These partial classifications facilitated the complex classification of the EU member states, by which different development tendencies across the countries in the period 2005–2015 might be deciphered. By analysing the relationships between gross domestic product, income distribution and poverty rates, and by developing a system by which to classify countries, essential information regarding individual countries’ economic and social development is revealed, with implications for their distinctive challenges in reducing inequality and poverty. The article also highlights considerable diversity in countries’ relative abilities to handle a range of unfavourable global trends, such as the recent global financial crisis. In general, countries with strong economies are better able to weather challenges such as inequality and poverty during a period of crisis.

Keywords

European Union Economic growth Inequalities Poverty Bourguignon model 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The article was created with the support of the scientific project no. 2/0009/18, financed by the VEGA grant agency.

References

  1. Adams, R. H. (2004). Economic growth, inequality and poverty: Estimating the growth elasticity of poverty. World Development, 32(12), 1989–2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azpitarte, F. (2014). Was pro-poor economic growth in Australia for the income-poor? And for the multidimensionally-poor? Social Indicators Research, 117(3), 71–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bourguignon, F. (2004). The poverty-growth-inequality triangle. The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper (28102). http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPGI/Resources/342674-1206111890151/15185_ICRIER_paper-final.pdf. Accessed 21 November 2016.
  4. Chemli, L., & Smida, M. (2013). Interaction between poverty, growth, and inequality during the crisis: A panel data study. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 5(5), 120–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2002). Growth is good for the poor. Journal of Economic Growth, 7(3), 195–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Duclos, J. Y. (2009) What is “pro-poor”? Social Choice and Welfare.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-008-0308-x Accessed 26 January 2018.
  7. European Commission (2010). Communication from the Commission—Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52010DC2020&from=en. Accessed 16 January 2017.
  8. European Commission (2011). Cohesion Policy 2014–2020— Investing in growth and jobs. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/regulation/pdf/2014/proposals/regulation2014_leaflet.pdf. Accessed 16 January 2017.
  9. European Commission (2017). Commission presents White Paper on the Future of Europe. Brussels. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/news/commission-presents-white-paper-future-europe-2017-mar-01_en. Accessed 9 October 2017.
  10. Eurostat (2017). Database. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/ database. Accessed 9 February 2017.
  11. Ferreira, F. (2012). Distributions in motion: Economic growth, inequality, and poverty dynamics. In P. N. Jefferson (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Poverty (pp. 427–462). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Finweb (2016). Ekonomiky strednej a východnej Európy čaká rast (The economies of Central and Eastern Europe are expecting a growth). http://finweb.hnonline.sk/financie-a-burzy/661337-ekonomiky-strednej-a-vychodnej-europy-caka-rast. Accessed 6 October 2017.
  13. Funke, M., & Strulik, H. (1999). Regional growth in West Germany: Convergence or divergence? Economic Modelling, 16(4), 489–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Iradian, G. (2005). Inequality, poverty, and growth: Cross-country evidence. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2005/wp0528.pdf. Accessed 9 October 2017.
  15. Khan, M. A., Khan, M. Z., Zaman, K., & Hassan, U. (2013). Global estimates of Growth-Inequality-Poverty (GIP) Triangle: Evidence from the World Bank’s classification countries. Quality & Quantity, 48(5), 2631–2646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leitner, S., & Stehrer, R. (2014). Drivers of inequality and poverty in the CEE and other EU member states. A Shapley value decomposition analysis. https://www.wiiw.ac.at/drivers-of-inequality-and-poverty-in-the-cee-and-other-eu-member-states-dlp-3431.pdf. Accessed 10 October 2017.
  17. Michálek, A., & Podolák, P. (2004). Enlargement of the EU: Comparison of the member and accession countries from the point of view of selected demographic and socio-economic characteristics. Problemi na geografijata, 3–4, 3–21.Google Scholar
  18. Pravda (2017). Slovensko si udržiava vysoký rast nad tromi percentami (Slovakia keeps a high growth of more than three percent). https://spravy.pravda.sk/ekonomika/clanok/438439-slovensko-si-udrziava-rychly-rast-nad-tromi-percentami/. Accessed 6 October 2017.
  19. Ravallion, M., & Chen, S. (2001). Measuring pro-poor growth. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/747531468746709289/pdf/multi0page.pdf. Accessed 22 November 2016.
  20. Tebaldi, E., & Kim, J. (2015). Is income growth in the United States pro-poor? A state-level analysis. Eastern Economic Journal, 41(2), 251–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zeman, K., & Shamsuddin, S. (2017). Linear and non-linear relationships between growth, inequality, and poverty in a panel of Latin America and the Caribbean countries: A new evidence of pro-poor growth. Social Indicators Research.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1581-9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Geography of the Slovak Academy of SciencesBratislavaSlovakia

Personalised recommendations