Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Relationship Level and Customer Response to Service Recovery

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Service failure is inevitable. A better understanding of how relationship level (RL) influences a consumer’s response to service failure and recovery is an important topic for academics and practitioners. This study investigates the connections among consumer RL, failure attributions (i.e., stability and controllability), service failure severity, perceived equity (PE), compensation, and consumers’ future behavior in the context of restaurant service and online shopping. Using equity theory, this study explored the importance of consumers’ entire history of shared interactions with service organizations. Specifically, the study empirically tested the different consequences of compensation by manipulating consumer RL. Consumer RL motivates consumers to follow a different attribution process to judge the severity of service failure and determines consumers’ PE. Moreover, consumers’ PE could then influence their future behavioral intentions, especially how they continue the relationship with the service organization. Findings from the two studies indicate that when additional compensation is offered after a service failure, PE increased regardless of consumer RL. The influence of compensation on PE thus varies as a function of RL. Consumers with a low RL are more sensitive to compensation. Furthermore, enhanced equity perception automatically means that corresponding future relationship continuity is also enhanced. The results further demonstrate that controllability attribution influences service failure severity, which has a negative impact on the PE of the exchange and mediates the effectiveness of compensation as a recovery effort.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreassen, T. W. (2000). Antecedents to satisfaction with service recovery. European Journal of Marketing, 34(1/2), 156–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreassen, T. W., & Lervik, L. (1999). Perceived relative attractiveness today and tomorrow as predictors of future repurchase intention. Journal of Service Research, 2(2), 164–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendapudi, N., & Berry, L. (1997). Customers’ motivations for maintaining relationships with service providers. Journal of Retailing, 73(1), 15–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, L. L. (1995). Relationship marketing of services growing interest, emerging perspectives. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 236–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitner, M. J. (1990). Evaluating service encounters: The effects of physical surroundings and employee responses. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, M. K., Cronin, J. J., Jr., Fox, G. L., & Roehmb, M. L. (2008). Strategies to offset performance failures: The role of brand equity. Journal of Retailing, 84(2), 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cambra-Fierro, J., Melero-Polo, I., & Sese, J. (2015). Does the nature of the relationship really matter? An analysis of the roles of loyalty and involvement in service recovery processes. Service Business, 9(2), 297–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casidy, R., & Shin, H. (2015). The effects of harm directions and service recovery strategies on customer forgiveness and negative word-of-mouth intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 27, 103–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, W. C., Kirk, R. K., & Janis, L. M. (2004). The effects of severity of failure and customer loyalty on service recovery strategies. Production and Operations Management, 13, 307–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wulf, K., Odekerken-Schroder, G., & Lacobucci, D. (2001). Investment in consumer relationships: A cross-country and cross-industry exploration. Journal of Marketing, 65(4), 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeRuyter, K., & Wetzels, M. (2000). Customer equity considerations in service recovery: A cross-industry perspective. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 11(1), 91–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folkes, V. S. (1984). Consumer reactions to product failure: An attributional approach. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(4), 398–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, H., Wu, D. C., Huang, S., Song, H., & Gong, J. (2015). Monetary or nonmonetary compensation for service failure? A study of customer preferences under various loci of causality. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 46, 55–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garbarino, E., & Johnson, M. S. (1999). The different roles of satisfaction, trust and commitment in customer relationships. Journal of Marketing, 63(2), 70–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C., & Ross, I. (1992). Consumer responses to service failure: Influence of procedural and interactional fairness perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 25(2), 149–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grégoire, Y., Tripp, T. M., & Legoux, R. (2009). When customers love turns into lasting hate: The effects of relationship strength and time on customer revenge and avoidance. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 18–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal, D., Roggeveen, A. L., & Tsiros, M. (2008). The effect of compensation on repurchase intentions in service recovery. Journal of Retailing, 84(4), 424–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gümmesson, E. (2002). Relationship marketing in the new economy. Journal of Relationship Marketing, 1(1), 37–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ha, J., & Jang, S. (2009). Perceived justice in service recovery and behavioral intentions: The role of relationship quality. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 28(3), 319–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heskett, J. L., Sasser, W. E., Jr., & Schlesinger, L. A. (1997). The service profit chain: How leading companies link profit to loyalty, satisfaction, and value. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, R. L., Ganesan, S., & Klein, N. M. (2003). Service failure and recovery: The impact of relationship factors on customer satisfaction. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(2), 127–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, K. D., & Kelley, S. W. (2000). Perceived justice needs and recovery evaluation: A contingency approach. European Journal of Marketing, 34(3/4), 418–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hur, J. Y., & Jang, S. C. (2016). Toward service recovery strategies: The role of consumer-organization relationship norms. Journal of Services Marketing, 30(7), 724–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, S. W., & Davis, M. A. (1994). Antecedents to customer expectations for service recovery. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22(1), 52–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, S. W., Hoffman, K. D., & Davis, M. A. (1993). A typology of retail failures and recoveries. Journal of Retailing, 69(4), 429–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W. G., & Cha, Y. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of relationship quality in hotel industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 21(4), 321–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, S. Y., & Jang, S. C. (2012). Effects of compensation for service recovery: From the equity theory perspective. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31, 1235–1243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leone, R. P., Rao, V. R., Keller, K. L., Luo, A. M., McAlister, L., & Srivastava, R. (2006). Linking brand equity to customer equity. Journal of Service Research, 9(2), 125–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, C. Y., & Fang, Y. H. (2016). How online service recovery approaches bolster recovery performance? A multi-level perspective. Service Business, 10(1), 179–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2006). Service-dominant logic: Reactions, reflections, and refinements. Marketing Theory, 6(3), 281–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattila, A., & Cranage, D. (2005). The impact of choice on fairness in the context of service recovery. Journal of Services Marketing, 19(5), 271–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxham, J. G., III. (2001). Service recovery’s influence on consumer satisfaction, positive word-of-mouth, and purchase intentions. Journal of Business Research, 54(1), 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxham, J. G., III, & Netemeyer, R. G. (2002). Modeling customer perceptions of complaint handling over time: The effects of perceived justice on satisfaction and intent. Journal of Retailing, 78(4), 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McColl-Kennedy, J. R., & Sparks, B. A. (2003). Application of fairness theory to service failures and service recovery. Journal of Service Research, 5, 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCollough, M. A., Berry, L. L., & Yadav, M. S. (2000). An empirical investigation of customer satisfaction after service failure and recovery. Journal of Services Research, 3(2), 121–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayandas, D. (1998). Measuring and managing the benefits of customer retention: An empirical investigation. Journal of Service Research, 1(2), 108–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikbin, D., Ismail, I., & Marimuthu, M. (2013). The relationship between informational justice, recovery satisfaction, and loyalty: The moderating role of failure attributions. Service Business, 7, 419–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R. L., & Swan, J. E. (1989). Consumer perceptions of interpersonal equity and satisfaction in transaction: A field survey approach. Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, L. L., & Johnson, M. D. (2003). Service equity, satisfaction, and loyalty: From transaction-specific to cumulative evaluations. Journal of Service Research, 5(3), 184–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raimondo, M. A., Miceli, G. N., & Costabile, M. (2008). How relationship age moderates loyalty formation: Increasing effect of relational equity on customer loyalty. Journal of Service Research, 11(2), 142–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randalla, W. S., Gravierb, M. J., & Prybutok, V. R. (2011). Connection, trust, and commitment: Dimensions of co-creation? Journal of Strategic Marketing, 19(1), 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabharwal, N., & Soch, H. (2011). Confirmatory factor analysis of determinants of service recovery. Global Business Review, 12(2), 297–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiders, K., & Berry, L. L. (1998). Service fairness: What it is and why it matters. Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), 8–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. K., & Bolton, R. N. (1998). An experimental investigation of customer reactions to service failure and recovery encounter: Paradox or peril? Journal of Service Research, 1(1), 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. K., Bolton, R. N., & Wagner, J. (1999). A model of customer satisfaction with service encounters involving failure and recovery. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(3), 356–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teng, C. I., Chen, S. Y., Chang, H. Y., & Fu, C. W. (2014). Service failure, time pressure, and conscientiousness of service providers: The dual processing model perspective. Service Business, 8, 659–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsiros, M., Mittal, V., & Ross, W. T. (2004). The role of attributions in customer satisfaction: A reexamination. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 476–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Casielles, R., Río-Lanza, A. B., & Díaz-Martín, A. M. (2007). Quality of past performance: Impact on consumers’ responses to service failure. Marketing Letters, 18(4), 249–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. W. (1973). New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25(2), 151–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. S., Wu, S. C., Lin, H. H., & Wang, Y. Y. (2011). The relationship of service failure severity, service recovery justice and perceived switching costs with customer loyalty in the context of e-tailing. International Journal of Information Management, 31(4), 350–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1980). Human motivation. New York, NY: Holt Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (2000). Attributional thoughts about consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(3), 382–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz, J., & Mattila, A. S. (2004). Consumer responses to compensation, speed of recovery and apology after a service failure. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 15(2), 150–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, A., & Sohal, A. (2002). An examination of the relationship between trust, commitment and relationship quality. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 30(1), 34–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi, Y., & La, S. (2004). What influences the relationship between customer satisfactions and repurchase intention? Investigating the effects of adjusted expectations and customer loyalty. Psychology and Marketing, 21(5), 351–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Fang, Y., Wei, K., Ramsey, E., McCole, P., & Chen, H. (2011). Repurchase intention in B2C e-commerce—A relationship quality perspective. Information & Management, 48(6), 192–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business Administration, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua, Taiwan

    Fan-Yun Pai & Liang-Yu Lin

  2. Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Quemoy University, Kinmen, Taiwan

    Tsu-Ming Yeh

Authors
  1. Fan-Yun Pai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tsu-Ming Yeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Liang-Yu Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tsu-Ming Yeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pai, FY., Yeh, TM. & Lin, LY. Relationship Level and Customer Response to Service Recovery. Soc Indic Res 140, 1301–1319 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1820-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1820-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation