Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Focussing on the Extremes of Good and Bad: Media Reporting of Countries Ranked Via Index-Based League Tables

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper provides the first published evidence for a ‘U’ shaped relationship between country ‘league-table’ ranking based on the Human Development Index and Corruption Perception Index and media reporting. The results suggest that the Extremity Hypothesis proposed by Heath (Glob Environ Change 21(1): 198–208, 1996) applies to such data rather than the alternative of the Centrality Hypothesis. In the Extremity Hypothesis people are more likely to transmit information regarding extremes, perhaps because people value ‘surprisingness’ or think that others do so, and the inevitable polarity of league-tables would appear to invite greater attention on those countries that rank high and low. This is an important finding as it suggests that countries at these extremes could act as exemplars. However, this is not to say that at more regional scales the media may pick-up on differences between ‘peer group’ countries ranked towards the middle of the league-table. Much more attention needs to be given by researchers to the use of indicators and indices and what helps to influence this, especially as it would help inform further development of existing indicators/indices and the creation of new ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aday, S. (2010). Chasing the bad news: An analysis of 2005 Iraq and Afghanistan war coverage on NBC and Fox News Channel. Journal of Communication, 60, 144–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J., & Thomson, P. (2004). Just ‘good and bad news’? Disciplinary imaginaries of head teachers in Australian and English print media. Journal of Education Policy, 19(3), 301–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (2006). League tables—Do we have to live with them? Perspectives, 10(2), 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. (1940). The conditions of economic progress. London: McMillan and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, D. (2014). GDP: A brief but affectionate history. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Maria, B. (2008). Neo-colonialism through measurement: A critique of the corruption perception index. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 4(2/3), 184–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donchev, D., & Ujhelyi, G. (2014). What do corruption indices measure? Economics and Politics, 26(2), 309–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frønes, I. (2007). Theorizing indicators: On indicators, signs and trends. Social Indicators Research, 83(1), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gans, H. (1980). Deciding what’s news. New York: Vintage Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garz, M. (2014). Good news and bad news: Evidence of media bias in unemployment reports. Public Choice, 161, 499–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hák, T., Janoušková, S., & Moldan, B. (2016). Sustainable development goals: A need for relevant indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60, 565–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haskins, J. B., & Miller, M. M. (1984). The effects of bad news and good news on a newspaper’s image. Journalism Quarterly, 61(1), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C. (1996). Do people prefer to pass along good or bad news? Valence and relevance of news as predictors of transmission propensity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68(2), 79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, P. M., & Rose, J. (2014). “Close but no Cigar”: The measurement of corruption. Journal of Public Policy, 34(3), 507–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinkel, J. (2011). Indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity: Towards a clarification of the science-policy interface. Global Environmental Change, 21(1), 198–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Human Development Reports (HDR). Published by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), New York, between 1990 and 2017. Available at: http://hdr.undp.org/

  • Kelly, A. C. (1991). The Human Development Index: ‘Handle with care’. Population and Development Review, 17(2), 315–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollmeyer, C. J. (2004). Corporate interests: How the news media portray the economy. Social Problems, 51(3), 432–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J., Williams, A., & Franklin, B. (2008). A compromised fourth estate? Journalism Studies, 9(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lüchters, G., & Menkhoff, L. (2000). Chaotic signals from HDI measurement. Applied Economics Letters, 7, 267–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCluskey, J. J., Swinnen, J., & Vandemoortele, T. (2015). You get what you want: A note on the economics of bad news. Information Economics and Policy, 30, 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon A. (2016). Uniting the United Kingdom. What comes after Brexit. Snapshot July 6th, 2016. Available at https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-kingdom/2016-07-06/uniting-united-kingdom.

  • Morse, S. (2013). Out of sight, out of mind. Reporting of three indices in the UK national press between 1990 and 2009. Sustainable Development, 21(4), 242–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, S. (2014). Stirring the pot. Influence of changes in methodology of the Human Development Index on reporting by the press. Ecological Indicators, 45, 245–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, S. (2015). Developing sustainability indicators and indices. Sustainable Development, 23(2), 84–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, S. (2016). Measuring the success of sustainable development indices in terms of reporting by the global press. Social Indicators Research, 125, 359–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, R. H. (1990). Classical and modern regression with applications (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveed, N., Gottron, T., Kunegis, J., & Alhadi, A. C. (2011). Bad news travel fast: A content-based analysis of interestingness on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 3rd international web science conference article no. 8. Available at http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2527052.

  • Neumayer, E. (2001). The human development index and sustainability—A constructive proposal. Ecological Economics, 39, 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noorbakhsh, F. (1998). A modified Human Development Index. World Development, 26(3), 517–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, B., Casquero, A., & Sanjuán, J. (2014). Growth in human development: The role of corruption. Journal of International Development, 26(7), 939–1096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, B., Casquero, A., & Sanjuán, J. (2016). Corruption and convergence in Human Development: Evidence from 69 countries during 1990–2012. Social Indicators Research, 127(2), 691–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pissourios, I. A. (2013). An interdisciplinary study on indicators: A comparative review of quality-of-life, macroeconomic, environmental, welfare and sustainability indicators. Ecological Indicators, 34, 420–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, B. L., Yuen, E. J., & Westaway, R. M. (2011). Putting vulnerability to climate change on the map: A review of approaches, benefits, and risks. Sustainability Science, 6(2), 177–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. (2012). Troubling tradeoffs in the Human Development Index. Journal of Development Economics, 99(2), 201–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinne, J., Lyytimäki, J., & Kautto, P. (2013). From sustainability to well-being: Lessons learned from the use of sustainable development indicators at national and EU level. Ecological Indicators, 35, 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagar, A. D., & Najam, A. (1999). Shaping human development: Which way next? Third World Quarterly, 20(4), 743–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltelli, A. (2007). Composite indicators: Between analysis and advocacy. Social Indicators Research, 81(1), 65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauder, M., & Lancaster, R. (2006). Do rankings matter? The effects of US News & World Report rankings on the admissions process of law schools. Law & Society Review, 40(1), 105–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soroka, S. N. (2006). Good news and bad news: Asymmetric responses to economic information. The Journal of Politics, 68(2), 372–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, T. N. (1994). Human development: A new paradigm or reinvention of the wheel? The American Economic Review, 84(2), 238–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton E. A. (2007). The Human Development Index: A history. Political Economy Research Institute working paper series no. 127, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.

  • Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., et al. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), 736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streeten, P. (1994). Human development: Means and ends. The American Economic Review, 84(2), 232–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Human Development Reports published between 1990 and 2014. New York: UNDP, Human Development Report Office.

  • van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2009). The GDP paradox. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(2), 117–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, D. E., & Laufer, W. S. (2009). Are corruption indices a self-fulfilling prophecy? A social labelling perspective of corruption. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 841–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. Social Development Indicators (annually between 1987 and 1996). Washington DC: World Bank.

  • World Bank. World Development Reports (annually between 1978 and 1986). Washington, DC: World Bank.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the anonymous reviewers of the paper for their helpful and supportive suggestions for the improvement of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Environment and Sustainability (CES), University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK

    Stephen Morse

Authors
  1. Stephen Morse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Morse.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morse, S. Focussing on the Extremes of Good and Bad: Media Reporting of Countries Ranked Via Index-Based League Tables. Soc Indic Res 139, 631–652 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1726-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1726-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation