Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of Social Network on Human Capital of Land-Lost Farmers: A Study in Zhejiang Province

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rapid urbanization in China has resulted in the inability of land-lost farmers, who are considered to lack sufficient human capital. Few studies have been conducted to investigate the effects of social network and land expropriation on the human capital of land-lost farmers. Therefore, effective improvement of land-lost farmers’ human capital remains unknown. To address this gap, this study investigates the effects of social network on the human capital of land-lost farmers and the moderating effects of land expropriation with the case of Zhejiang Province in China. Regression is used to examine the effects of social network, which is measured by network scale (NS), network intensity (NI), and mutual trust (MT), on human capital. Hierarchical regression is used to examine the moderating effects of land expropriation, which is measured by land location (LL) and settlement mode (SM). The study indicates that NS, NI, and MT have more positive effects on human capital under the moderating role of LL. However, only NS and NI have more positive effects, yet MT has insignificant effects on human capital under the moderating role of SM. The results indicate that land expropriation scenarios affect the relationship among social network and human capital to some extent. The findings can facilitate the local governments formulate appropriate policies that promote human capital among land-lost farmers through enhancing social network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Cliff, J. E. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5), 573–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonucci, T. C., Birditt, K. S., & Ajrouch, K. J. (2011). Convoys of social relations: past, present and future. Handbook of Life Span Development, 2(1), 161–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attewell, P. (1992). Technology diffusion and organizational learning: The case of business computing. Organization Science, 3(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bao, H. J., & Peng, Y. (2016). Effect of land expropriation on land-lost farmers’ entrepreneurial action- A case study of Zhejiang Province. Habitat International, 53, 342–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayraktar-Sağlam, & Bahar, (2016). The stages of human capital and economic growth: Does the direction of causality matter for the rich and the poor? Social Indicators Research, 1(127), 243–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becattini, G., Bellandi, M., & De Propies, L. (2009). A handbook of industrial districts. Northampton: Edward Elgar Pub.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Breschi, S. (2000). The geography of innovation: A cross-sector analysis. Regional Studies, 34(3), 213–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, J. C. (2004). The effects of knowledge attribute, alliance characteristics, and absorptive capacity on knowledge transfer performance. R & D Management, 34(03), 311–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciravegna, L. (2011). Social ties and technological learning in new Silicon Valley clones. Journal of Development Studies, 47(8), 1178–1198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(03), 301–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deindl, C., Brandt, M., & Hank, K. (2016). Social networks, social cohesion, and later-life health. Social Indicators Research, 126(3), 1175–1187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, G., & West, D. (2010). Exploring the potential of social network analysis in asset-based community development practice and research. Australian Social Work, 63, 404–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eze, U. C., Goh, G. G. G., Goh, C. Y., & Tan, T. L. (2013). Perspectives of SMEs on knowledge sharing. VINE, 43(2), 210–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fei, X. T. (2013). Rural China. Hong Kong: Zhong Hua Book Company. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, C., Perkmann, U., Puntscher, S., Walde, J., & Tappeiner, G. (2016). Trust Works! Sources and effects of social capital in the workplace. Social Indicators Research, 128(2), 589–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, N., & Pinch, S. (2000). Spatialising knowledge: Placing the knowledge community of motor sport valley. Geoforum, 31(2), 191–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, Y. C., Chen, C. J., & Chang, S. C. (2011). Knowledge management capacity and organizational performance: The social interaction view. International Journal of Manpower, 32(5–6), 645–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, R. (1996). Social identity. London: Routledge Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Joonmo, S. (2016). Institutional affiliation as a measure of organizational social capital: a case study of Korea, Social Indicators Research, 2(29), 699–716

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawachi, I., & Berkman, L. (2000). Social cohesion, social capital, and health. Social epidemiology (pp. 174–190). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W., & Mauborgne, R. (1997). Fair process: Managing in the knowledge economy. Harvard Business Review, 75(04), 65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, C. (2013). Social capital or social cohesion: What matters for subjective well-being? Social Indicators Research, 110(3), 891–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, A., Kier, C., Fung, T., Fung, L., & Sproule, R. (2013). Searching for happiness: The importance of social capital (pp. 247–267). Happiness Studies Book Series, Springer, Netherlands: The exploration of happiness.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. H., Huang, J. W., & Tsai, M. T. (2009a). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: The role of knowledge creation process. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(4), 440–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q., Sun, L. Y., & Luo, F. J. (2009). The land-lost farmers’ withdraw from labor market, voluntarily or involuntarily: Empirical analysis based on the Pearl River Delta. Issues in Agriculture Economic, (8). 78–84,111–112. (in Chinese).

  • Lin, N. (2001). Social capital. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L. P. (2006). Utilization of ties in immigrant groups-a case study of Pingjiang village in Shenzhen. Social sciences in China Press, 5, 112–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y. C., & Pan, S. L. (2007). Analysis of the influence of social capital factor on the urbanization of land-expropriated farmers. Economic Survey, 5, 118–121. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X., Griffith, D. A., Liu, S. S., & Shi, Y. Z. (2004). The effects of customer relationships and social capital on firm performance: A Chinese business illustration. Journal of International Marketing, 12(4), 25–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Z. Y., & Qin, Q. W. (2009). Residential differentiation and group gap: The study on the problem and solution of land-lost peasants’ residence in the city. Urban Studies, 16(1), 8–11. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, G. R., & Yang, E. Y. (2011). Social networks, informal finance and entrepreneurship. Economic Research Journal, 3, 83–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miriam, D., Sarah, C., & Castro, G. (2015). The moderating role of social networks within the radical innovation process: A multidimensionality of human capital-based analysis. International Journal of Technology Management, 69(2), 117–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mithchell, J. C. (1969). The concept and use of social networks in social network in urban situations. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational Advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K. M., & Cooprider, J. G. (1996). The contribution of shared knowledge to IS group performance. MIS Quarterly, 20(04), 409–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oki, S., Jann, H. T., & Yuni, R. B. (2015). Human capital traits and informal knowledge sharing: The role of reciprocity norm, mutual trust, and cultural interpretation perspective. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 6(02), 123–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, Y. (2015). A comparison of two approaches to develop concentrated rural settlements after the 5.12 Sichuan Earthquake in China. Habitat International, 49, 230–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, Y., Lai, Y. N., Li, X. W., & Zhang, X. L. (2015). An alternative model for measuring the sustainability of urban regeneration: the way forward. Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, 76–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, Y., Shen, Q. P., Shen, L. Y., Lu, C., & Yuan, Z. (2014a). A generic decision model for developing concentrated rural settlement in post-disaster reconstruction: A China study. Natural Hazards, 71(1), 611–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, Y., Shen, L. Y., Tan, C., Tan, D. L., & Wang, H. (2013). Critical determinant factors (CDFs) for developing concentrated rural settlement in post disaster reconstruction: A China study. Natural Hazards, 66(2), 355–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, Y., Shen, L. Y., Zhang, X. L., & Ochoa, J. J. (2014b). The feasibility of concentrated rural settlement in a context of post-disaster reconstruction: A study of China. Disasters, 38(1), 108–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roper, S., Du, J., & Love, J. H. (2008). Modelling the innovation value chain. Research Policy, 37(6–7), 961–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvatore, F., & Fernanda, M. (2015). The effect of human capital and networks on knowledge and innovation in SMEs. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 1(16), 39–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. (1990). The role of education and study—Investment of human capital. Beijing: The Commercial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shan, J. J. (2007). The social networks transition of rural workers who moving into urban areas. Urban problems, 4, 59–63. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, G. B., & Li, Y. F. (2010). Change in network: Analysis on social network and the transformation of land-lost farmers into townspeople. Fudan Journal, 02, 99–107. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, L., Lu, W., Peng, Y., & Jiang, S. (2011). Critical assessment indicators for measuring benefits of rural infrastructure investment in China. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 17(4), 176–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soetanto, D. P., & Geenhuizen, M. P. (2010). Social capital through networks: the case of university spin—ff firms in different stages. Journal of Economic & Social Geography, 101(5), 509–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(1), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61(04), 674–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoye, G., Van Hooft, E. A. J., & Lievens, F. (2009). Networking as a job search behavior: A social network perspective. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology., 82, 661–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. B. (2008). A Research on the Social Exclusion of the Land-requisitioned Farmers. Nanjing Social Sciences, 3, 114–120. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. G., & Chen, H. (2013). The influence factors of suburban land-lost farmers’ poor urban adaptability: Zhengzhou. Urban Problems, 2, 68–73. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, L. B., & Li, J. (2014). Analysis for effects of social capital and human capital of agricultural industry cluster on farmers’ income: Based on the micro-data of tea industry cluster in Anhui Province. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 35(12), 41–47, 110–111. (in Chinese).

  • Wellman, B. (1988). Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance—A network approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen, J. (2004). Farmer’s citizenship: the role transition from farmers to townspeople. Journal of East China Normal University: Philosophy and Social Science, 36(03), 55–63. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, G. S., Li, J. Z., & Sun, Y. Z. (2000). Technology innovation network and technology outsourcing. Science Research Management, 4, 34–43. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S., Lin, L., & Hsu, M. (2007). Intellectual capital, dynamic capabilities and innovative performance of organizations. International Journal of Technology Management, 39(3), 279–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Y. (2010). Land-lost farmers’ employment situation and its determinations of—Case of Nanjing city. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 12(4), 65–72. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye, J. Z. (2004). Farmers’ social networks in their development and innovation. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 24(9), 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye, J. Y., & Yi, G. C. (2010). Obtainment of social capital and economic position of farmers (workers—Researches in patterns of farmers in the city of Beijing. Study & Exploration, 1, 143–147. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., & Sapienza, H. (2001). Social capital, knowledge expropriation, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7), 587–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zander, U., & Kogut, B. (1995). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S., & Guo, X. X. (2011). A study on social network resources and their effects on income: Based on the quantile regression model. Society, 31(1), 94–111. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, K. W., & Xu, K. (2007). Social capital operation mechanism of industrial cluster. Economist, 4, 59–64. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., & Yu, T. (2012). Mining trust relationships from online societal networks. Journal of computer science and technology, 27(3), 492–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, F. T., & Sun, J. (2006). From livelihood to development—On the construction of the supporting system for encouraging Chinese peasants’ entrepreneurial in view of their land loss. Economist, 01, 54. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, D. M., & Fang, G. (2008). A Study of Employment desire, employment choose and social support networks about land-lost farmers in the suburbs of a city——A case study of Longquanyi District, Pi County, Dujiangyan city, Chengdu. Urban Studies, 1, 41–46. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work described in this paper was jointly supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Nos.: 41371187; and 71503228) and Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province of China (Project No.: LQ16G030006).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi Peng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bao, H., Zhu, X., Cen, Y. et al. Effects of Social Network on Human Capital of Land-Lost Farmers: A Study in Zhejiang Province. Soc Indic Res 137, 167–187 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1592-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1592-6

Keywords

Navigation